In the play Twelve Angry Men, the jurors had to make a decision in determining if a young man accused of murder was guilty or innocent. Looking at the evidence presented, the boy was rightfully found not guilty. Two key reasons that support this conclusion are, the woman across the el tracks was not wearing her glasses, and the amateur stab wound compared to the boy's experience in knife fighting. These reasons demonstrate the lack of actual evidence against the boy. First, the fact that the woman across the elk tracks was not wearing her glasses significantly affects the credibility of her testimony. Juror Eight states, "She couldn't have had time to put on her glasses then" (3.1.61). This detail raises doubts about the accuracy of her testimony.