When somebody conforms, they join with the group. He or she doesn't want to draw attention to themselves or do anything that makes them stand out. Individuality, on the other hand, is a quality or character feature that separates one thing or person from another. There should be a balance of conformity and individuality in a society to have everything in one order. They are possibly better understood as two perspectives that can and do coexist to various levels in every society or community. They are neither naturally morally good nor terrible.
An emotionally secure environment was formed inside the society thanks to the balance between individuality and conformity, which allows each person to express themselves while everyone respects one
…show more content…
“Both individuality and conformity are essential in society. They involve behaviors which are related with the expression of one’s feelings and thoughts. Hence, these concepts are often associated with psychology, sociology, and philosophy” (Brown). Both conformity are essential parts of society. They are behaviors related to expressing one's feelings and thoughts. This leads to many relationships between these ideas like psychology, sociology, and philosophy.
Fahrenheit 451 expresses a similar emotion in its plot. In the beginning of the book Clarisse McClellan is introduced to Montag. One day when Montag is returning home from work, Clarisse approaches him and expresses herself. Everyone Montag has ever met is the opposite of Clarisse. “"You're not like the others. I've seen a few; I know. When I talk, you look at me. When I said something about the moon, you looked at the moon last night. The others would never do that"(Bradbury, 23). Clarisse says this after Montag
…show more content…
“Although conformity in society encourages individuals to make changes that bring them closer to the majority, the reality of this process is that it doesn’t impact mobile societies. We do not experience change as a group because there is a preference to not “rock the boat.” There must be people who are unwilling to change in any circumstance to drive results. You must have access to a system of checks and balances within our society to help determine a fair definition of equality. If everyone were to conform to do the same thing all the time without questioning the rules, it would be challenging to find moments of innovation” (Regoli). Because people are resistant to change, the statement claims that social conformity has little effect on mobile societies. However, it is untrue because society can be described by change, and people constantly go through change. Conformity can be helpful since it creates a sense of community and belonging, which is another