ipl-logo

Examples Of Mission Command Of Pearl Harbor

2271 Words10 Pages

Pearl Harbor in relation to mission command structure Introduction Mission Command has some important facets that ensure the proper execution of commands within the military. The first mission of any military endeavor is to stay alive while protecting the interests of its nation (S.Alberts). The human race from primitive times has always sought to procure resources for their own survival. This situation created the need for fighting so as to end conflict through the use of force. Ensuring the survival of a combat group makes it necessary to have structure, organization and leadership (Creveld). The leadership is structured along the command chain and is what provides the first facet or principle of a mission command which is using mission command …show more content…

In an effort to function efficiently these groups developed structures that ensured its survival and order. Pearl Harbor is a classic example of nations fighting for resources in an effort to further its interests and betterment. Groups in primitive societies merged with other similar groups to increase their capacity to increase in wealth (Black). The same thing still happens to date even after these groups had fully evolved into kingdoms and nations. There their defense systems also evolved into national armies as fighting groups were consolidated into one centralized and formal fighting group. These formal fighting groups fought on behalf of their societies and in return were rewarded with payment in terms of money, recognition and honor. Pearl Harbor was a high and glorious moment in history for the Japanese while it was a low one for the Americans, which plunged both countries into World War II. The success of the Japanese was however short-lived as it did not plan and strategies to destroy the whole naval base which cost them a lot. Many nations have gone into war in an effort to procure the better good of their citizens while many others

Show More
Related
1814 Words | 8 Pages

Scribbles on Scrap: A Mission Command Analysis of the Battle of the Little Bighorn The massacre at the Little Bighorn in 1876 was one of the most recognizable battles in American history. The defeat of the 7th Cavalry Regiment and the slaughter of 268 Soldiers by the Sioux serves as an enduring subject of study for contemporary military professionals. The basic modus operandi for command principles in the times of the Indian Wars loosely mirrors the mission command philosophy of today; however, if we still lay credence to the efficacy of the mission command philosophy, how was it that a conventional force under the direction of a battle proven leader was defeated by an irregular enemy? In the end, Lieutenant Colonel George A. Custer’s complacent

Read More
850 Words | 4 Pages

Issued Mission Orders As a hierarchical organization, the Army relies on orders to emphasize desired results to subordinates. “Commanders use mission orders to provide direction and guidance that focus the forces’ activities on the achievement of the main objective, set priorities, allocate resources, and influence the situation” (Wade, 2015, p. 5-5). General Harrison’s army repulsed disparate Indian attacks because of the guidance and orders issued by the general. Harrison initially ordered his men to stay on high alert and to sleep with their weapons loaded and within reach, indicating to his men that a pre-dawn attack was likely.

Read More
1633 Words | 7 Pages

Introduction The attack on Pearl Harbour occurred before World War Two, on December 7th 1941, when Japan launched a pre-emptive strike against the United States of America. Pearl Harbour, in Hawaii, was attacked, and 20 naval vessels, as well as 300 airplanes, were destroyed. The Japanese did this because the American government had imposed sanctions and trade embargoes upon Japan as a result of Japan declaring war on China and attempting to take over China’s import market, in order to solve its demographic and economic issues.2 This prompted the American congress to vote to join World War Two, two years after it had begun.2 My research task aims to discover whether or not Japan’s actions are justified.

Read More
1128 Words | 5 Pages

By definition, “mission command is the exercise of authority and direction by the commander using mission orders to enable disciplined initiative within the commander’s intent to empower agile and adaptive leaders in the conduct of unified land operations,” according to ADRP 5-0. Mission command is about knowing when to change the task to fit the purpose. This paper is intended to analyze the mission command of one side of the battle, focusing on the commander’s role in the operations process. The Battle of Bunker Hill was the most important battle of the American Revolution because of Colonel Prescott’s superior command and control.

Read More
952 Words | 4 Pages

The attack on Pearl Harbor was a surprise to the Americans. However, Japan’s plan was to destroy the Pacific Fleet for Japan to seize the resource areas needed for its southern expansion, but if they were unsuccessful, they would go to war. After the attack, President Franklin D. Roosevelt declared war on Japan. Pearl Harbor was one of the most horrifying attack that took place on December 7, 1941 at the American Naval Base near Honolulu, Hawaii.

Read More
1617 Words | 7 Pages

• The reason for the Japanese attacking the location of Pearl Harbor was because it was home to the US Pacific Fleet, which was viewed as their only threat. • Preparations for the attack included the Japanese approaching the island of Oahu slowly and stealthy in order to be undetected by the American air and naval forces around the Hawaiian Islands. • They had to draw the attention of the Americans away from the naval base and towards Southeast Asia. • As the Japanese were increasingly coming up along the shores to attack, they came to the conclusion that the northern coast was more vulnerable than to the south or to the west.

Read More
854 Words | 4 Pages

December 7th is a day that will live in infamy for all Americans, a day once filled with death, destruction, and desolation. On December 7th1941 a huge fleet of Japanese fighters, bombers, ships, and submarines converged and attacked the United States Navy at Pearl Harbor, resulting in the destruction or damage of 19 US Navy ships, damage or destruction of 347 planes, as well as the death of 2471 Sailors, and many more injured. At first it seemed there was no reason for Japan’s attack but after many years the United States figured out why they did what they did. There were at least three reasons why the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor; these include: the many United States embargos towards Japan, the rapidly growing U.S. fleet, and extreme Japanese

Read More
682 Words | 3 Pages

Prior to the attack on Pearl Harbor, there were a wide variety of opinions regarding the country’s involvement in the war. Furthermore, there was a large difference between the opinions of the American citizens that stayed home and were merely ‘witnesses’ to the war, verses the soldiers that fought in the war. Aside from this, there was generally a very similar attitude towards the war from most Americans. Within the southern states, there seemed to be an immense support and trust in the President’s actions.

Read More
237 Words | 1 Pages

On December 7th 1941 was the Japanese attacked a US naval base in Hawaii. Them attacking was the base of the start of World War II. “Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, is located near the center of the Pacific Ocean, roughly 2,000 miles from the U.S. mainland and about 4,000 miles from Japan.” (PEARL HARBOR n/d). Pearl Harbor was an easy target for Japan, knowing that they could destroy Pacific Fleet so, America wouldn’t be able to fight back.

Read More
685 Words | 3 Pages

First, the Japanese began the war in Pearl Harbor. The attack on Pearl Harbor was a surprise attack that caused mass destruction. According to one historian, “The tactics were brutal and many more Americans lost their lives.” (Nuclearmuseum.org). Following Pearl Harbor, the way the Japanese were going about the war was barbaric.

Read More
222 Words | 1 Pages

December 7th, 1941, is one of the most infamous dates in American history. On this day, at 7:55am, Japan launched a devastating surprise attack on Pearl Harbor, catapulting America’s involvement in World War II. Japan had intended the attack to be a preventative measure in order to keep the U.S. Pacific Fleet from interfering with their military actions. The assault lasted two hours, and the Japanese managed to dismantle the American Fleet, destroying nearly 20 naval vessels, including eight enormous battleships, and more than 300 airplanes! More than 2,000 American soldiers and sailors lost their lives, and another 1,000 were wounded.

Read More
194 Words | 1 Pages

The attack on Pearl Harbor was a crucial incident that happened in America. This event reshaped our purpose in an era of alarming conflict. People have given us the details of the event on what happened or what led up to it. But instead it is the story of the men, who were there that historic day, that really matters.

Read More
1800 Words | 8 Pages

General Patton, in the Battle of the Bulge exercised the principles of mission command to the fullest and they yielded significantly great results for the Allied forces. General Patton employed each of the principles in different ways in order to ensure that the German surprise attack did not significantly set back the Allied forces in the war. The exercise of mission command allows a commander to conduct military operations and missions through dispersed execution. According to Army Doctrine Publication (ADP) 6-0, Mission Command, the definition of mission command is “the exercise of authority and direction by the commander using mission orders to enable disciplined initiative within the commander’s intent to empower agile and adaptive leaders in the conduct of unified land operations”. General Patton exhibited four of the mission command principles extremely well during the Battle of the Bulge.

Read More
1042 Words | 5 Pages

Leadership in the Army is the fundamental foundation of the organization. Leaders like Officers and Non- Commission Officers implement and set the standard of leader to soldiers. These leaders ensure the Army soldiers are trained and prepare for any hardships they face. The term Leadership can be defined differently based on the organization in which the term is applied to. In the Army Leadership can be described as a "characterized by a complex mix of organizational, situational, and mission demands on a leader who applies personal qualities, abilities, and experiences to exert influence on the organization, its people, the situation, and the unfolding mission" (ADP 6-22).

Read More
998 Words | 4 Pages

I started this course with the belief that the leadership is a conventional concept that assumes a top-down, role-based view of leadership and that traditionally refers to how a one manages people and makes decisions. My understanding of leadership includes specific characteristics that leaders are regarded as having control and power, that leaders are followed because of personal loyalty to the position, not to the individual, and that power is conferred on the leader. In the traditional autocratic/ bureaucratic style of leadership, leaders make the decision and dictate work methods and process and followers are rarely trusted with decisions or important tasks. The decisions taken are in mostly accordance to the book of rules, and there is

Read More

More about Examples Of Mission Command Of Pearl Harbor

Related Topics

Open Document