We have always believed that even when mankind is brought down to the ashes, when we have lost hope on everything. That there is always going to be a guiding hand that will pull as out of the ashes and bring us back to where we were before the tragedy. The truth is that most of us would be willing to accept that idea that man is going to be able to pull ourselves from the deepest tragedy we are through. In Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451 the novel has a more optimistic view to what we believed would happen if the world was to be brought down to it's knees.This book shows us that this is possible we don’t always have to have a pessimistic view of humans. Bradbury wrote book on how pessimistic humans can be but maybe that's not what he meant.
The novel mainly follows Guy Montag, who is basically our main character in the book. Montag is in this dystopian future where books are condemned by
…show more content…
Some might have felt that his writing might have had some pessimistic view on humans and that we would never survive ourselves. Guy was in a dystopia where every where he turned after reading books he was scared. With most books now have an open ending state where we can decide for ourselves about the outcomes. "Yes. A time to break down, and a time to build up. Yes. A time to keep silence and a time to speak. Yes, all that. But what else. What else? Something, something . . .'And on either side of the river was there a tree of life, which bare twelve manner of fruits, and yielded her fruit every month; And the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations.yielded her fruit every month; And the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations.' " Ecclesiastes Montage recites it. There are going to be people who will hold on to our previous believes and when we finally decide that government is wrong. We will listen to what the books have