Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis Of Of mice and men
Analysis Of Of mice and men
Analysis Of Of mice and men
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
George made the heart-wrenching decision to kill his best friend, Lennie Small. Killing Lennie is justified throughout the book Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck because if George did not kill Lennie, then Lennie would’ve had a slow, painful death, due to the fact the Curly is furious at Lennie for murdering his wife. “Curley gon’ta wanna get ‘im lynched,”says Candy (Steinbeck 94). Candy's dog is a blind, deaf old dog that cannot even walk with ease, and does not eat food. After Carlson shot Candy’s dog Candy says “I ought to of shot that dog myself”(Steinbeck 61).
In, Of Mice and Men, there are ample examples of foreshadowing that implies that George will kill his companion from youth, Lennie, at the end of the book. Readers may notice a sign of trouble when George tells Lennie to hide in the bush in the first part of book, by which the author indicates that another incident will happen and Lennie will get into trouble again. Another much more significant foreshadowing happens, when Candy let's Carlson shoot his old dog in back of its head, killing him instantly. Soon after, Candy regrets letting a stranger shoot his longtime companion, and feels a sense of guilt, implying that he does not want George to make a similar mistake. George received an idea from the way Carlson offered Candy to kill his dog,
In this chapter, the gloom is relieved by the hopeful planning of the three men — George, Lennie, and Candy — toward their dream. For the first time in his life, George believes the dream can come true with Candy's down payment. He knows of a farm they can buy, and the readers' hopes are lifted as well, as the men plan, in detail, how they will buy the ranch and what they will do once it is theirs. But while Steinbeck includes this story of hope, the preponderance of the chapter is dark. Both the shooting of Candy's dog and the smashing of Curley's hand foreshadow that the men will not be able to realize their
In Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck many hard decisions were made. In this novel two Characters George and Lennie get kicked out of their last city and travel to soledad to start their new life. Lennie causes lots of commotion at the ranch which turns people against George and Lennie. At the end of the novel George kills Lennie which raises the question if he fairly weighed all of the options and if his choice was justified or condemned. One reason why this was a justified decision is that George only wanted the best for his best friend.
Many characters in the short story Of Mice and Men meet an untimely demise for reasons that were never expected. Characters in the story that met such a fate include Candy’s dog, Curley’s wife, Lennie’s puppy, and Lennie himself. These deaths and the events that lead up to them bear a certain resemblance to each other. Some of these deaths are not directly related to others, but instead use symbolism to convey the idea that many characters in the story have similar characteristics, so despite their obvious differences, the characters in the story often relate to one another in multiple ways. By using a metaphorical method of writing, John Steinbeck is able to show the reader that some characters, though physically opposite, can be very similar
Steinbeck quotes: “Look, Candy. This ‘ol dog jus’ suffers himself all the time. If you was to take him out and shoot him right in the back of the head-’ he leaned over and pointed, ‘-right there, why he’d never know what hit him.” (Steinbeck, 71). This quote acts as a catalyst to foreshadow the scene at the end of the novel.
In John Steinbeck’s novella,”Of Mice and Men” george gave up on their dreams of owning a ranch because he couldn’t think of owning the ranch without Lennie, because of these three reasons three reasons: George know lennie killed Curley’s Wife; George had known Lennie was on the run--George knew that he had to be the one to kill lennie. In George knowing that Lennie had killed Curley’s Wife George tells Candy about who killed her by saying Candy said,“what done it?” George looked at him coldly. “Ain’t you got any idear”(94).
Of Mice and Men, a book written by John Steinback that focuses on 1930s California laboring, is placed on a work ranch in California. Candy, a ranch hand, had a dog that he had brought with him to the work ranch and had grown a strong bond with, this is unique because most people travel alone however, another ranch hand, Carlson, did not want the dog around. Carlson thought that the dog had an odor and a poor quality of life and should be euthanized. Candy is suffering with this decision because he knows that the dog is suffering but he also loves the dog and has grown a very strong bond with it. Candy should euthanize the dog because the dog is suffering and the dog is no longer useful to candy and the dog would have a painless death.
Candy's dog eventually gets shot for no reason, other than the fact that the others do not like him. The dog was hated by the other men living on the farm. The sense of feeling that others do not like you is one of the main contributes to lonliness in the world today. Steinbeck attempts to allow readers to recognize this, and change their actions and words towards others to prevent this lonely state in
Steinbeck states in the novel, “You seen what they done to my dog tonight?”(60). An example of Candy telling George and Lennie his problems. Candy still feels upset over his dog death by Carlson. But by using that excuse he got George to agree with him, to let him live in the ranch once they earn enough money. With Candy’s help with George and Lennie’s dream, it is easier and now faster for the three of them to get their ranch.
“The mouse” was able to move on from the grievous matter due to his disengagement to the past. Instead, blinded by a fabricated fantasy, Lennie was ignorant of the fact his own life was in very grave danger, therefore he was able to carry on happily. In the poem that inspired Steinbeck, the author presents the idea that mice are not burdened with knowledge of the past nor future, (Burns 36). The idea that “mice” live in a blissful ignorance rather than stressful reality is translated from “To a Mouse” to Of Mice and Men. The “mice” are able to live life happily with no regrets, unlike the men distressed by life and in George’s case, having to live with the memory of pulling the trigger to his companion’s death.
The quote reveals Candy's sombre outlook on life and his sense of hopelessness. He lacks a support system of family or friends, leaving him feeling purposeless and exposed. Despite his past struggles, he now feels life is not worth living. The death
The only thing that has been with Candy through everything is his dog, he lost his hand, his youth and now his beloved dog. Candy is left with nothing but himself, and because he doesn’t say much to anyone he has few
All people have goals, but some have no chance of achieving them. In John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men, Candy, Crooks and Lennie all live on the same farm, but are faced with different circumstances holding them back from achieving what they desire. Through the characters of Candy, Crooks, and Lennie, Steinbeck shows that issues outside the control of an individual often limit the achievement of an individual’s dream. Throughout the novel, Lennie is faced with obstacles that are in the way of him attaining his ultimate goal.
In Edgar Allen Poe’s short story,” The Cask of the Amontillado” he utilizes the literary element of irony to evolve the predominant theme of vengeance. The main character, Montresor ,has a diabolical plan to kill his so called friend, Fortunato. While they are walking down the damp catacombs, Montresor recommends “[that] they [should] go back… [because Fortunato’s] health is precious,”( Poe,3). The author uses irony to display to the reader that the goal of vengeance can be obtained in different ways. This illuminates the idea of punishing those who wronged you.