Does Title IX discriminate against male athletes? Well, in the article, “Title IX defeats male athletes,” by Ann Coulter, it says that Stephen Neal, a world champion wrestler, was captain of the wrestling team at California State University-Bakersfield when the school cut the team. Not because there wasn’t enough resources, but because there were just too many male athletes. Federal law made CSU do it. Title IX states that, ‘No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.’ Title IX discriminates against male athletes by cutting teams, trying to make male sports equal to female sports, and news coverage.
First of all, male athletes are being discriminated against by cutting the teams. By cutting the teams, the males are being excluded from participation in the sport, which is a violation of Title IX. Just because there are too many male athletes, doesn’t be that the
…show more content…
In the article, “Title IX defeats male athletes” by Ann Coulter, she says that male’s teams are being decimated in pursuit of an insane feminist dream that has morphed into feral policy: to make women’s sports equal to men’s, but really this shouldn’t have happened. Women play different sports than men do, sports are all different, and they shouldn’t have to be equal. Some sports are for men, some sports are for women, and some sports are for both. Some of the sports that are for men, could be too competitive or too complicated, but the sports that are for women exist so that women don’t have to play a sport that might be too hard for them. So in a way, men’s and women’s sports are already equal if you think about it because there is something for men to play and something for women to