The Creature’s Unjustified Morals of a Monster
Frankenstein’s horror tragedy leaves the reader with a dilemma about Victor’s creature guiltiness and moral responsibility. This dilemma arises due to the irresponsible care from his creator and general hatred received from the human species; contrasted by his unjustified actions towards innocents and commitment of murders as the catharsis from his problems. It is true that this being was inattentively abandoned in the most fundamental stages of its life and that circumstances may have corrupted his initial good benevolence. However, in this essay, I argue that the actions, motives, and values expressed by the unnamed creature in Shelley’s story make him solely responsible and, because of their
…show more content…
This strategy is first seen and stated explicitly when the creature meets William. Here, his first intentions of finding a companion are sublimed as soon as he hears the last name of the kid: “Frankenstein! you belong to my enemy – to him towards I have sworn eternal revenge” (Shelley, 117). It is important to notice the drastic change of behavior from the creature, which referred to Victor’s brother as “beautiful child” and “an unprejudiced creature in his infancy”. This implies his recognition of the innocence in the child and the superposition of his interest to it, which suggest a selfish and cold uncompassionate motive to take the life of the …show more content…
This unjustified behavior and cruelty on his actions entitled the creature with the word that Victor used to refer to him through the book, and, that many readers find themselves using when thinking about this being: a monster. This seemed to be as well the perception that Mary Shelley wanted to transmit in this character, as near to the end of the book the creature realizes, after seeing victor’s body laying on the ship, the evil he has committed, and the impossibility of remedying these