ipl-logo

Examples Of Westlaw Research Authority

363 Words2 Pages

1. i. Relevant Secondary Authority: 31 Causes of Action 2d 121 (Originally published in 2006) (Westlaw). ii. Violates right of publicity (Westlaw Research Skills Three). iii. Legal issue: Is a movie studio allowed to use and replicate a well-known person in a film without asking that person? (Westlaw Research Skills Three). iv. On point case: Brill v. Walt Disney Co., 2010 OK CIV APP 132, 246 P.3d 1099 (Westlaw). v. The Brill v. Walt Disney Co. case appears to work for or against my client. It will work against my client, if Mr. McSteamy does not have a “common law ownership of a valid trademark” as stated in Brill v. Walt Disney Co., 2010 OK CIV APP 132, 246 P.3d 1099 (Westlaw). 2. i. Relevant Secondary Authority: § 135:3.Effect of prejudicial incident—Prosecutorial misconduct, 27 Standard Pennsylvania Practice 2d § 135:3 (Westlaw). ii. …show more content…

Prosecutorial misconduct (Westlaw Research Skills Three). iii. Legal issue: Is the prosecutor able to use improper comments that can sway the court against the person on trial? (Westlaw Research Skills Three). iv. On point case: Reid v. Beard, 420 F. App'x 156 (3d Cir. 2011) (Westlaw). v. The Reid v. Beard case appears to work for our client. The Reid v. Beard case is about prosecutorial misconduct and how the prosecutor made improper statements about the defendant (Reid v. Beard, 420 F. App'x 156 (3d Cir. 2011) (Westlaw). 3. i. Relevant Secondary Authority: § 11:2.Theft by taking, 4 Ia. Prac., Criminal Law § 11:2 (2017-2018 ed.)

Show More
Related

Summary Of Santobello V. New York, 404 US

431 Words | 2 Pages

Case Brief Case title: Santobello V. New York, 404 U.S 257 (1971) Facts: Santobello was indicted with two felonies and plead guilty to a lesser offense after negotiating with the prosecutor. The offense that he did plead guilty had a maximum sentence to only a year in jail, which was less than the original two felonies, and the prosecutor at the time said he wouldn’t recommend anything to the judge. However, a different prosecutor took over the case and did end up recommending the maximum sentence. The defendant’s, Santobello’s, attorney objected and told the judge of the deal that the former prosecutor made a deal to not recommend sentencing, but the judge said that no one influenced him and that the he believed the maximum one year sentence was appropriate based on Santobello’s criminal record.

Read More

Disclosing Company's Secret Process Of Ever-Gold

1183 Words | 5 Pages

The uniform Trade Secrets Act ( UTSA): New Hampshire adopted the uniform Trade Secrets Act that refers to the theft of trade secrets as misappropriation. Misappropriation refers acquisition of a trade secret and disclosing information regarding trade secret without consent. (Stim, R.

Read More

Evidence For The Murder Of Eugene H. Krabs

1048 Words | 5 Pages

It is the prosecutor who has all the resources to investigate the case. It is not the job of the defendant to go out and investigate the matter. We would ask you to render the only verdict that is fair, not

Read More

Summary Of Marcia Clark Is Redeemed

1757 Words | 8 Pages

As mentioned before, this article rakes through the demeaning experiences of leading prosecutor, Marcia Clark, as she relentlessly tried to present the evidence of the OJ Simpson case. Clark even recalled how her worse critic was not the ruthless media, or judgemental jury, but the supposedly impartial Judge, Mr. Lance Ito. The article also discusses Clark’s likability and its non-existence amongst the jury, or the outside spectators. As a result of her being so disliked, her lack of warmth was used as an excuse to justify the unfair treatment and little empathy she received during the trial. Nude and topless photos of her were leaked to the press, she was called a bad mother for not being able to effortlessly balance her young twins and effectively prosecute the “trial of the century”, and she was criticized for not operating within the lines of femininity at all times.

Read More

Biases In The Cosby Case Steven T. O Neil

1737 Words | 7 Pages

Sarah Hitchcock After 52 hours of deliberation, The Cosby case was declared a mistrial by judge Steven T. O’Neil (Puente, M. 2017). The case took course over 6 days at Montgomery Country Courthouse in Norristown, Pa. The jury consisted of 7 men and 5 women; 4 white women, 6 white men, 1 black man, and 1 black woman. Bill Cosby was on trial for aggravated and indecent assault, with accusations coming from Andrea Constand. Constand originally told the police in 2005, a year after the incident, but she declined to press charges due to insufficient evidence and accepted an undisclosed amount of money in a civil suit (Schallhorn, 2017).

Read More

How Does Atticus Finch Use Rhetorical Appeals In To Kill A Mockingbird

1028 Words | 5 Pages

Samantha Ilewicz Pre AP English 9 Rachel Drouin 10 March 2023 Super awesome cool title In a court case, there is a defendant and a prosecutor. Each of these people has a motivation to win, and an argument to do so. To make these arguments stronger, rhetorical appeals are used.

Read More

New York Times V Ronald Nachman Case Summary

713 Words | 3 Pages

In 1964, the Supreme Court ruled on a landmark case holding in favor of New York Times and established a malice standard which must be met before a report in the press regarding a public figure can be considered defamatory or libel. The case New York Times v Sullivan, was argued before the Supreme Court by attorneys M. Ronald Nachman, Jr., for the respondent, and Herbert Wechsler, for the petitioner. Both attorneys presented compelling arguments on behalf of their clients. Accordingly, Mr. Nachman presented four significant arguments on behalf of L. B. Sullivan, who had prevailed in the Alabama courts, claiming an ad in the New York Times, “Heed Their Rising Voices,” defamed him personally.

Read More

Plea Bargain Essay

1427 Words | 6 Pages

Another conflict with justice is time management. While it is an evil necessity to not prosecute some cases in order to allow for an efficient courtroom, this may prevent justice from being served. The final influence that conflicts with justice is the relationship between prosecutors, defense attorneys and the judge. It is necessary that everyone be able to work together, but the mentality of “helping” each other or remaining in favor does not sit well with me. It is concerning to think a prosecutor may lessen a charge or pursue a case more aggressively based upon the opinion/feelings of the defense or

Read More

Cleopatra's Reputation Analysis

1316 Words | 6 Pages

There are some cases in the entertainment industry where the producer of a movie may intentionally change the character of a person to gain publicity and for the movie to be more entertaining. This is seen in the various versions that are portrayed of Cleopatra. Her actual reputation has been copied by the media to

Read More

Examples Of Exceptions To The Rule Of Hearsay

1471 Words | 6 Pages

Hearsay, Hearsay Exceptions, and Hearsay Difficulties Jacob Karko Arizona State University CRJ 321 Professor Andrew Clemency January 28th, 2023 Hearsay, Hearsay Exceptions, and Hearsay Difficulties The purpose of this paper is to explore four topics revolving around hearsay in the court room. The first topic is defining hearsay, what can be considered hearsay and its differences with the standard definition. The second topic will cover what is not hearsay despite being close in relation to hearsay. The third topic is the exceptions to hearsay under rules 8/01 through 807.

Read More

Finders Law Essay

1438 Words | 6 Pages

For: The main objective of finders’ law is to reunite the true owner with their lost property. As Cheapa and the Queensland Police proved unsuccessful at doing this, the general rule of ‘finders keepers’ may apply. Rules and obligations of the finder can be extracted from Parker v British Airways Board. Lord Justice Donaldson states that: 1. “The finder of a chattel acquires no rights over it unless (a) it has been abandoned or lost…” 2.

Read More

Prosecutorial Misconduct

1087 Words | 5 Pages

Today in the United States of America many individuals have been falsely convicted of charges with the prosecutors performing prosecutorial misconduct. Many individual lives have been ceased due to the long sentencings of being falsely accused of convictions. The chief officials over these cases should have rules and regulations as to how prosecutorial cases are dealt with, set a standards to show the misconduct and to relief the defendant, and to emphasize on ways to prevent future incidents of prosecutorial misconduct. The first step of dealing with prosecutorial misconduct is the fact that “each state bar has a mechanism in place for the discipline of misconduct by attorneys licensed in that state. Separately, federal courts may discipline

Read More

Big Bill Haywood Case

377 Words | 2 Pages

Tierney (1979) makes the point in describing Darrow’s handling of the Haywood case (Clarence Darrow was lead co-counsel, but there were 14 other attorneys for the defense) that: “It remains a matter of dispute in many of his cases whether his handling helped

Read More

Trial Judge Credibility

1859 Words | 8 Pages

In your every day, ordinary lives, the credibility one has is important. No vocation requires more skill to assess the credibility of others than in the court system. On any given day a trial judge faces many people whose lives hang in the balance and will likely do anything to keep from being restricted from their freedoms. People will lie, twist the truth, and conveniently remember things differently all to hide the sordid truth. Knowing this, it becomes increasingly apparent that the courts, judges and representatives need to have a keen ability to assess credibility.

Read More

Examples Of Guilty Pleas

1116 Words | 5 Pages

Most criminal cases end when the defendant (the person accused of a crime) pleads guilty. Guilty pleas are usually favored by everyone involved – each side gets some benefit: A trial isn’t added to the judge’s already-busy court schedule; the prosecution gets a conviction, and the defendant gets some favored treatment, like a sentence that’s less than the one he’d probably get if he went to trial and lost. Pleading guilty comes at a cost, though. A defendant gives up a lot of important rights, like a jury trial and confronting witnesses.

Read More

More about Examples Of Westlaw Research Authority

Open Document