Fahrenheit 9/11 Analysis

1208 Words5 Pages

Throughout each person’s life they must deal with and endure great hardships. Often a tremendous event places these people in such a situation. The attacks that occurred on September 11th 2001 were such an event. Due to this attack many people were forced to deal with great hardship for long periods of time.The films Fahrenheit 9/11 by Michael Moore and Oliver Stone’s World Trade Center successfully display this theme of hardship stemming from this dreadful attack. Moore and Stone use rhetoric to persuade viewers to harmonize with the idea that humanity was forced to cope with hardships . Certain conventions are used to accurately depict specific details of 9/11 and how they affected many people. Finally the analysis of 9/11’s future impact continue to demonstrate the magnitude of this catastrophe. Ultimately the documentary Fahrenheit 9/11 displays the hardship individuals must face as a result of 9/11 better than the movie World Trade Center as Michael Moore does a superior job …show more content…

This interview is very effective as viewers are provided with an expert opinion on the matter at hand. By using this convention the audience is ensured that Moore’s information is accurate. The primary convention in the movie World Trade Center is dramatization. This film is based on true story, thus the recreation of certain events is a logical choice. For much of the film Stone recreates the time that officers Mcloughlin and Jimeno were trapped under rubble. The officers time under the rubble is riddled with intense screams of pain due to injuries that are also out on display. This dramatization used by Stone is very detailed and therefore excellent at showing the hardship that both Mcloughlin and Jimeno faced whilst trapped under the south tower. Had the interviews and dramatizations not been present in either of the films, their ability to display their central messages would