ipl-logo

Fall Of Rome Dbq Essay

706 Words3 Pages

The two factors that most contributed to the fall of the Roman Empire were greatly impactful in Ancient History. Before the fall of the Empire, during the Pax Romana, Emperors ruled longer and most likely died of natural causes. During the decline, the reign was much shorter and they were most likely to be murdered. Thanks to Dioclectian’s reign, the New Empire was introduced, giving people more rights and protection. However, this resulted in great consequences as it became harder to govern and harder to manage. The Economy of Rome was a great reason as to why the Empire fell. The Economy of Rome was unstable due to the way the emperors had ruled and their unreasonably mistaken choices, leading to a lack of trade and poverty. The Leadership …show more content…

As stated before, during the Pax Romana, leaders reigned for a good amount of time, most likely dying of natural causes. After the Pax Romana, leaders reigned for a very, very short amount of time and were most likely assassinated or murdered. Source 2 of the Leadership category explains how the emperors of Rome were ineffective, weak, and inconsistent. They cared more about the wealth of Rome than the people and the citizens lost their trust in the government. It explains how the "ineffective, weak and inconsistent leadership only made things worse." This shows that their leadership did not benefit Rome at all only adding on to the reasons why Rome fell. The leaders cared more about gaining and maintaining wealth than meeting the needs of the people. The Senate had no power to do anything to stop this. This resulted in the citizens to lose their trust in the Roman government. Source 1 of the Leadership category corroborated this when it says how Leadership was inefficient, weak, and they were unable to meet the needs of the people. There was no economic stability. The Leaders of theRoman Empire were weak and unreliable. They were unable to meet the needs of the people and did not end up benefitting Rome in the

Show More
Related
707 Words | 3 Pages

In Rome, there were 22 different emperors in only a 50-year time period from 235-285 CE (Doc A). Another way that the Roman government was failing, according to Document B, is because the emperor allowed his soldiers to stop wearing armor and he didn’t enforce the draft. Similarly, Document E says that the Roman people believed that their government was ruining the state and that they lived better under the rule of the Huns. The Roman Empire having 33 different leaders was a sign that it had a weak government because of the inconsistency.

Read More
657 Words | 3 Pages

With a new emperor coming into power frequently, the government was not stable and it was definitely not productive. This could have affected the bad military decisions, and the issues with enforcing drafts. In addition, with assassinations occurring all the time, it would have been easier for other civilizations to invade Rome. Even though Romans looked down on others as uncivilized, by the fall of Western Rome,I feel that they were just as

Read More
906 Words | 4 Pages

Close to the end of the era for the Roman Empire, Rome wasn't able to keep an emperor for a long period of time. Roman emperors from 235 - 285 CE were either assassinated, died in a battle, a plague, or died from suicide. About 19 emperors between the 50 year period all died and did not serve for a long period of time. The chart from Document A shows the emperors, each reign, and how they died. Just by looking at the chart, it shows that Rome and its government were not able to keep any emperors.

Read More
500 Words | 2 Pages

Most of their reigns were ended by assassinations. This means that people didn’t like their leaders and their unstable government system and the people would go as far as assassination to get rid of their emperors. An unstable government caused the fall of Rome because of injustice and because people kept assassinating their

Read More
488 Words | 2 Pages

After examining these documents, my three reasons for the fall of Rome are, Foreign invaders invading Rome, natural disasters, and the citizens weren't wearing armor. The first reason for the fall of Rome is that foreign invaders were invading Rome. the map in document C shows a lot of the foreign invaders coming to Rome to invade Rome. (Document C) My reason why I picked this is that when the invaders invaded Rome, the roman army is getting weaker and other armies are attacking Rome and the roman army runs away instead of fighting back.

Read More
598 Words | 3 Pages

The Roman empire was a prosperous empire that flourished between the years 27 BC - 476 AD. However, there were many internal and external factors that contributed to the fall of the Roman empire. Some internal factors that contributed to the fall of the Roman empire included their financial strains, and the people starting to distrust each other. Some external factors that contributed to the downfall of the Roman empire include constant pressure from the northern world, and Rome’s army not being able to compete with other armies.

Read More
617 Words | 3 Pages

Many Roman emperors only lasted about a year as rulers which led to the Roman people not truly making a connection/bond with the emperor who served which led to

Read More
551 Words | 3 Pages

As a Roman citizen, watching the decline of the Roman Empire was frightening because of the constant worry. The Roman Empire lost its power due to simultaneous external and internal factors such as the lack of political stability, deterioration of the military, and constant invasions from outsiders. The first internal factor that led to the fall of the Roman Empire was the lack of political stability. This was due to the constant change of emperors, causing haphazard leadership. “The soldiers in various parts of the empire proclaimed fifty emperors in about the same number of years” (Lines 8-10, Document 3a, Third Century Crisis of the Roman Empire).

Read More
867 Words | 4 Pages

Rome has become very weak and almost scared during this time period, to the outsiders Rome might be a big place but they are weakening and I have a feeling that it is going to cause a lot more wars and battles to come. There were a lot of things that stood out to me as being main issues for the fall but three that

Read More
893 Words | 4 Pages

Crassus invaded Jerusalem and stole the temple treasure while war broke out between Caesar and Pompey. The economic causes had a great impact on the Roman Empire crashing. Rome's government was not very organized and Rome's leaders had expensive lifestyles. Wars were occurring in the empire and the movement simply manufactured more coins to support it.

Read More
477 Words | 2 Pages

The fall of the Roman Empire, where every leader gets murdered along with the military. Rome was the most powerful empire in the ancient world until it fell. The three primary reasons for the fall of the Roman Empire are weakened military and invasions, too much territory to govern, and faulty leadership. One of the primary reasons why Rome fell was that it suffered from a weakened military and invasions.

Read More
1366 Words | 6 Pages

Historians have argued what caused the fall of the Roman Empire. Many historians have pointed to a number of reasons that the Roman Empire fell including; political instability, economic and social problems, the introduction of Christianity, the

Read More
994 Words | 4 Pages

The year 27 BCE marked the start of the Pax Romana, the height of the Roman Empire. Rome had a series of good emperors, and everything was well until 180 CE, when this period of peace ended. A few hundred years later, in 476 CE, the Western Roman Empire fell once and for all. The fall of the Roman Empire was caused by a combination of powerful enemies, geographical challenges, and most importantly, political instability. These factors weakened the Empire’s power and eventually led to its downfall.

Read More
468 Words | 2 Pages

The upper class of Rome gradually became more selfish and turned away from their jobs that once originally characterized their empire. Cultural decline caused by new commitments of the upper classes and lack of political authority also lead to the downfall of Rome. All these conflicts resulted in a spiral that steadily worsened. Explaining why the fall pf Rome left a bigger impact than the fall of the Han.

Read More
517 Words | 3 Pages

In Document A, it shows 19 Roman Emperors in the 50 years of 235-285 CE. Thirteen of the nineteen leaders were assassinated or possibly assassinated. This perhaps is because of weak leadership or only wanting the power for themselves. Citizens were also upset with how the government was not “not possessing the spirit of former generations” and because of this, it was “ruining the state.” (Doc E)

Read More

More about Fall Of Rome Dbq Essay

Related Topics

Open Document