Fallacy Of Equivalent Mass Problem

not to use those calculations in any confirmation of the assumptions since that would produce a logical fallacy.
Assumptions (such as the assumption of constant c) that lead to conclusions (such as length contraction and time dilation) that are used in an attempt to prove the original assumptions to be true have committed the fallacy of circular reasoning.
Comparisons of calculations with assumptions only serve to verify that the calculations were done correctly, not necessarily laudably or even appropriately or that the assumptions are physically valid.
For clarity, it is important to distinguish mental “measures” based upon assumptions from physical measurements. Any alien measures and other mental determinations based upon assumptions

Equivalent Mass Problem 1
The relativity principal states that all motion is relative so that any object considered to be in motion must have the same mass (still be the same object) as when it is considered stationary.
Therefore, when a moving object is considered stationary equivalent mass must inexplicably disappear just because we changed our coordinate system.
This is similar to the way the length of a moving meter stick becomes shorter than it was when it was considered stationary. (This manipulation makes far more sense mathematically than it does physically.)
Therefore, the physical mass of an object should be considered its (stationary) measured value called its “rest mass.”
Excessive calculated mass is considered the “equivalent mass” of the energy associated with its motion. Therefore, to satisfy the mathematical assumptions of relativity, all observers making measurements (calculating measures) in forced relativity must consider themselves (and all of their instruments) stationary.
Equivalent Mass Problem

Natural Relativity
“Natural relativity,” that follows is a “simplification up-date” of special relativity and general relativity combined (“forced relativity”).
Because of its simplicity, natural relativity harbors no general necessity to distinguish between inertial frames as in special relativity and accelerating frames as in general relativity.
There are five basic assumptions in natural relativity. (Once understood they can be made shorter and more concise.)
1) The D3 space network of fabrons is always finite as it expands exponentially;
It is uniform with constant density D. This assertion will be justified below.
2) Warp fields provide acceleration proportional to the force causing the acceleration; mass and velocity are independent variables, but F = m • a.
3) All motion is relative to a specific frame; an object’s current velocity vectors are additive as are all of its acceleration vectors.
4) Symmetrical warp fields correspond to stationary frames in which parochial motion is absolute.
5) Parochial light speed in a vacuum is constant c even as the universe expands, regardless of any motion of its frame or of the