ipl-logo

Falstaff In Henry IV Part I

705 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: How to portray falstaff in henry 4

The Significance of Falstaff In Henry IV Part I, Falstaff is an extended character who portrays relentless humor and folly. In Shakespeare’s other works such as Romeo and Juliet and Much Ado About Nothing, the comedic characters or scenes are minor and almost insignificant to the grand plot, however in Henry IV Part I Falstaff is a major character. It begs the question why Shakespeare chose to extend Falstaff and how this decision added to the plot. Falstaff is a significant character in a way where he is a father figure to Hal and a representation of one who does not see the purpose of honor. In the Henry IV Part I, throughout the entirety of the play Falstaff and Hal are together, and when Hal is approached with an issue regarding his father …show more content…

When Hal places the responsibility on Falstaff to find soldiers, Falstaff did just that but is also more concentrated on what he can gain from it. Instead of finding valiant and strong soldiers, he finds expendable ones. Falstaff has a will to corrupt but in a way where he wishes to corrupt the normality of the views an audience may have on honor “What is that honour? Air...Doth he feel it? No. Doth he hear it? No. 'Tis insensible, then” (Act V. i). Falstaff is completely harmless, he does not choose a side nor defend his own, he simply does not care. But Falstaff’s apathetic character shows that there may not be a good enough reason for anyone to care about anything, and this may be the lesson he wants Hal to learn before Hal loses himself in brainwashing royal duties. Falstaff is significant because he is the control in an experiment. There are characters who are in the heat of the moment, so driven by justice, fear, or honor; in reality, as Falstaff stands on the side as a mindless participator of this nonsense, he shows that none of it …show more content…

Falstaff is a character who represents the perspective of those who do not have a side or a reason to fight. Falstaff appears as one who does not care about anything, but truly he is mindful because he knows there is nothing worth for him to care about giving him no purpose to develop any class or respect for others. He represents the lifestyle Hal runs away to and stands as friend and father for Hal. Even in their immature adventures or Hal’s moments of greatness, Falstaff has an underlying lesson towards Hal to not forget what or who truly

Show More
Related
264 Words | 2 Pages

In return, Henry is respectful when trying to appeal to his audience, formally acknowledging and complimenting “the very worthy gentleman” (line 3) at the convention. Henry repeats how important knowing “the whole truth” (line 32) is to him in lines 17, 25, and

Read More
842 Words | 4 Pages

For example, Henry highlights the cowardice of the colonists when he emphasizes that they must “fulfill the great responsibility which we [colonists] hold to god and our country” (Henry 83). Henry appeals to his audience by assessing their religious values, then patriotism. By constructing this statement declaratively, the audience senses Henry’s passion and frustration with the lack of resistance that the colonists have shown to Britain's corrupt ways. Therefore, the audience believes it is a necessity to not only listen but to agree with a statement so direct.

Read More
183 Words | 1 Pages

In Shakespeare's play Henry VIII, Cardinal Wolsey reflects on his sudden downfall from power and uses various literary techniques to convey his complex response to his dismissal from court. He begins his speech by using a metaphor of a plant to convey the fragility of human life and the inevitability of his own downfall. He also uses figurative language, such as describing his pride as "high-blown," to emphasize his recklessness and lack of foresight. Wolsey's tone shifts from bitterness and contempt towards the spokesmen to mournfulness and resignation as he recognizes the futility of his past ambition and the emptiness of his former position. He acknowledges that he was "far beyond my depth" and compares himself to "little wanton boys that

Read More
1358 Words | 6 Pages

And because of this attitude Henry is respected by many and he was even named the war devil too by his comrades. There are even many instances of Henry being this way and it shows us how far Henry has really come in The Red Badge of Courage. To someone who would be terrified of the idea of war to now someone who’s ready to fight in the frontlines in war. Even though there are many scenes/events that show this new Henry, there’s one that in my opinion shows it the best and that scene is when Henry assumes the role of the flag bearer and takes the flag, “The youth and his friend had a small scuffle over the flag.

Read More
1140 Words | 5 Pages

In the opening scene of the first act of Shakespeare's King Henry VIII, the Duke of Norfolk and the Duke of Buckingham discuss the political state of England, introducing King Henry VIII and Cardinal Wolsey as major characters that will be at the forefront of the developing plot. Buckingham speaks of Wolsey very negatively in a passage after Wolsey passes by, insulting him and declaring that he will bring Wolsey's treachery to the king. In this passage Shakespeare depicts Wolsey as scheming and power-hungry to tell the narrative of evil counselors corrupting good monarchs and promote the concept that the king should be more independent as a way of flattering King James I while criticizing his counselor Robert Cecil, Earl of Salisbury. The

Read More
1044 Words | 5 Pages

This shows that Henry is patriotic, yet still his own character. Henry is trying to grant the audience a diverse viewpoint, rather than discrediting their

Read More
843 Words | 4 Pages

In William Shakespeare’s Henry V, the character of King Henry delivers some powerful verbiage, known as St. Crispin’s Day Speech, to his troops in order to rally the men for battle. In this speech, King Henry chooses to invoke themes such as glory, religion, and comradery to make the battle they are about to fight immortal in the soldiers’ minds and to motivate them to fight together. These themes draw similar emotions in all men, no matter their background; all men have the need for honour, the urge to please the deity they believe in, and the need to trust in their fellow men. Every man wants his story to be remembered.

Read More
1050 Words | 5 Pages

Some playwrights choose to write plays about historical events, among them there is The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, a play that describes the downfall of the rule of Julius Caesar, but is also a play that is not as truthful as it first impressionably is, a complete truthful account of Julius Caesar’s assassination and the events leading up to it. In order to greater attract the audience, Shakespeare, along with other playwrights, relied on adding historical inaccuracies to add the necessary suspense. Thus, Shakespeare strayed away from historical events occurring during Caesar’s lifetime, implementing inaccuracy into the story. Shakespeare based one of his most well-known plays, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, on historical events that includes

Read More
480 Words | 2 Pages

In this speech, from William Shakespeare's Henry VIII, Cardinal Wolsey addresses his sudden downfall as adviser to the king. Shakespeare describes how Wolsey feels as he found out the news. Moreover, he shows the anger and disappointment one could feel when it’s unexpected. Wolsey’s monologue reveals both his anger and lamentation as he struggles to understand why this downfall has occurred. Shakespeare portrays Wolsey’s farewell with allusions and figurative language, accompanied by a vengeful tone.

Read More
570 Words | 3 Pages

Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication?" He's making them think about everything they've done in the past that hasn't worked. Another example of logos is "Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrance have produced additional violence insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne. There is no longer any room for hope. " Henry is telling us that the British have been unresponsive to anything but armed resistance.

Read More
800 Words | 4 Pages

His choice of language is effective at evoking emotion. Through rhetorical questions, Henry was able to emphasize his points, and grab the audience’s attention, creating an emotional effect on the listeners. “Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation?” These statements prove the speaker’s argument and stir the audience’s emotions.

Read More
802 Words | 4 Pages

Henry’s flawed nature and inner desire to be morally upright are revealed as he escapes the battle and as he justifies himself

Read More
459 Words | 2 Pages

He uses ethos to persuade the audience by saying "sir were not ewak", reference to God, the credibility when he talks about God. God is a more credible person than the king. Patrick henry uses questions towards the audience like "are fleets and armies necessary to work of love and reconciliation?" He gets the audience to believe that his decision is a good decision, and that he can bring any fight or war and win like it was nothng.

Read More
1000 Words | 4 Pages

On March 23, 1775 “ Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death” was heard all throughout St. John's Church. These famous words were not only the use of a great speaker looking to have his voice heard, but they would have an everlasting impact on young English students studying the use of ethos, logos, and pathos. Patrick Henry used not only these rhetorical devices but also allusions, parallelism, and biblical references to bring his speech to life. In the very first sentence, Henry uses ethos to state how he is patriotic to his home

Read More
1245 Words | 5 Pages

Honor in Shakespeare’s Play Henry IV, Act One (The View of Honor in the Eyes of Falstaff and Hotspur in Shakespeare’s Play Henry IV, Act One) In Shakespeare’s play, Henry IV, Part One, two characters define what honor is to them. Hotspur and Falstaff are two different characters completely, one is a son of a nobleman and the other is a thief. Hotspur is son to Earl of Northumberland, making him the heir as well, the nephew of Earl of Worcester, and a good warrior too. The real name of Hotspur is Harry Percy, a member of the Percy family, which helped King Henry IV gain his power.

Read More

More about Falstaff In Henry IV Part I

Related Topics

Open Document