As I observed earlier, I thought that his Interests are in human nature, and that he recognized that as a consequence, people fall into various groups. I felt he wanted to avoid a situation in which any one group controlled the decisions of a society. With free elections and the majority principle protected the country from dictatorship that’s the tyranny of a minority. He was concerned about the greater risk of tyranny of the majority and central institutional issue how to minimize this risk. For Madison’s characteristically relied not only on formal institutions that could be designed, but also the particular sociological structure of American society. He took a fortunate starting point for the farmers of the new constitution. His solution …show more content…
The institutional arrangements were reinforced by sociological fact that Republic contained a multiplicity of interests and offset one another. The authority in it would derived from and dependent on the society. Society will be broken into so many parts, interests and class of citizens that have the rights of individuals or majority will be a little danger from interested combinations of the majority. This is good that there are many groups of interests that be numerous is less important than they be impermanent and shifting alliances whose components vary with the specific policy issue. Madison commenced statement of his theory in Federalist 51 Acknowledgement that these have not in any society are extremely likely to attack the haves. And Hamilton, from Virginia believed that class struggle to be inseparable from politics. It of great importance in a republic not to guard against the oppression of its rulers. Madison once said that to guard one part of the society against the injustice of the other. Different interests exist in different classes of people. Majority would be united by a common interest the rights or minority will be insecure. Madison, Sterile dualistic view of society was so common in eighteenth …show more content…
An advocate of a new constitution and the particular constitution that was drawn up in Philadelphia in 1787. Madison’s greatness as a statement rests in part of his ability to set his limited personal experience in the contest and the experience of men in other ages and time and giving extra insight to his political formulations. The effect of the first difference is on the one hand to refine and enlarge the public views. And whose wisdom made the best interest of their country and whose patriotism and love of justice to sacrifice it to temporary or partial considerations. Madison Assumes they would be more patriotic, intelligent, and more interested in the public good like what was best for the rich. The influence of factious leaders may kindle a flame within their particular states, but be unable to spread a general conflagration through the other states. The same proportion as such a malady is more likely to taint a particular county or district than an entire state. A society consisting of a small number of citizens, who assemble and administer the government in person, can admit of no cure the mischiefs of faction. Common passion or interest will, in almost