Feminist Reading: Dracula between Beauvoir’s and Roth’s Ideas In her article, “Suddenly Sexual Women in Bram Stoker’s Dracula” Phyllis Roth argues that Dracula is a misogynistic novel which is obvious in the system of power in which men are dominant and active figures whereas women are just followers and obedient to their system. She draws on Simon de Beauvoir’s idea that “ambivalence as an intrinsic quality of Eternal Feminine”, in order to show that women are victims to men powers. In her chapter, “Myth and Reality”, Beauvoir discusses the way that anybody in the society, specially men, doesn’t do their job in taking a step towards the oppressed women, but to act just like what the system of myth impose them to act. She shows that being immanent is what the society …show more content…
While Roth manages to show what Beauvoir discusses in “Myth and Reality”, that individuals have ambivalence which controls their choice of acting following the society roles, she just gives her point of view of how men treat women and base on women’s experience, however, she fails to show that women are, also, have ambivalence attitude. What is missing from her analysis is that Beauvoir when she discusses the ambivalence and the immanence and transcendence she shows that all individuals have these features, but Roth takes these ideas and discusses them based on men experience in the novel not women. In fact, Females, also, have ambivalence attitudes. For instance, when Lucy recognizes that there is something that is sucking her blood and she was able to describe it but she did not. Lucy just gives up by doubting what is going with her. Maybe her reason why she hides such a frightening thing is her fears of society and that she knows what will be her punishment if males, figures of power, know. Moreover, Mina is so