ipl-logo

Feudal Frontiers: Japan Vs Europe

850 Words4 Pages

Feudal Frontiers: Japan vs Europe
The Juxtaposition of Medieval Europe and Japan

In the span of history, two distinct feudal systems emerged in foreign lands, shaping the political and social landscapes of their respective regions. Feudalism is a government form where instead of one all-powerful leader, people were traded land and protection by those in a higher rank in return for their service. During medieval times, both Japan and Europe were under the power of feudalism, which was a major factor in shaping the regions’ history. The feudal systems of medieval Japan and Europe, although geographically separated, bore intriguing resemblances to each other and compare very similarly.
Although Japan and Europe were not in contact with each other …show more content…

Both warriors followed strict regulations that dictated their lives; the samurai believed in the Bushido Code and the knights followed the chivalry. Either code governed the fighters’ lives, heavily enforcing generosity, honor, and loyalty. Loyalty was by far the most meaningful aspect of their lives, dedicating themselves to their lord and vowing to guard them, even if it meant sacrificing their life. In most cases, in return for the land and manor or castle, the knights and samurai would fight for their master’s lord or shogun if they were in a war and would kill them if they betrayed their master. This was displayed in a popular film by Akira Kurosawa, The Forty-Seven Ronin, where 47 samurai seek revenge on the shogun that betrayed their master, and in real events in medieval Europe, vassals that were betrayed by their lord would stage a rebellion against them, and the knights sworn to loyalty would defend him to their last breath. The two types of warriors also believed in the same principles that allowed them to fight without fear of their impending demise, as they both believed in the idea that you should battle with your only purpose being to kill your opponent for the protection of your master or those weaker than you. As emphasized by Nagahama Inosuke in Hagakure,

Show More
Related
836 Words | 4 Pages

The following is a compilation of the two countries, and their versions of the feudal system. Feudal Japan and feudal Europe had contrasting social hierarchies. Feudal Europe’s hierarchy was based on religion and wealth, whereas feudal Japan’s hierarchy was based on military and necessities (Doc A). Lords in Japan were not a

Read More
344 Words | 2 Pages

I will be explaining the social position of Samurai, and Knights from Document A. According to Document A the SAmurai were the 4th highest on the social pyramid. They were above peasant farmers, but

Read More
514 Words | 3 Pages

Nihal Lalwani BBE 29 October 2014 8 History Essay Term 4 Assignment Tokugawa Japan (1600-1868) and Medieval Europe (590-1500) both grew in two separate sides of the world but both of them are similar in ways such as how they were run, their architecture, their warriors and the society. In discussing whether these two civilisations are similar, the research has led me to believe that these two civilisations are partly similar. There are many similarities between Japanese and Medieval European Castles such as what were they used for and how they worked. Medieval European Castles are similar to Japanese castles as they are used for similar reasons and architecture such as the castles had high walls for protection against arrows, both of them were used as outposts by respective lords of each civilisation (Friar, 2003. P.47).

Read More
583 Words | 3 Pages

Blayze McKenney Mrs. Thomas World History 7 12 April 2024 The Superiority of the Japanese Samurai After 14 years of rigorous Loyalty, Combat, and Mindset Training, the young warrior is finally ready to become a Samurai at the age of 14. The Japanese Samurai and the European Knights were 2 classes of very powerful warriors during the Middle Ages. Samurai were superior because they offered protection to their masters, went through rigorous training to get better at fighting, and were incredibly loyal to their masters when it came to following their code and protecting their masters. The samurai were superior to knights because they offered protection to peasants and daimyos.

Read More
639 Words | 3 Pages

In conclusion, both samurai and knights were both hard fighting warriors who would do anything for their

Read More
283 Words | 2 Pages

In this case the Japan and Europe are being classified. The samurais and knights are more alike than different mostly because of the social positions in their communities when they are classified on the social pyramids of Japan for the Samurai and Europe for the Knight. In one of the documents I have read (Document A) it shows the Classification for Japan and Europe. The Samurai and the Knight are both classified in the middle of each pyramid underneath the Shogun and the King but above the peasants in both societies. Also in Document B with Catharina Blomberg as the source it talks about being loyal to their lords.

Read More
947 Words | 4 Pages

Japan’s economic development had been shaped in various ways, including Japanese internal forces, and external forces from other countries. Although during the Tokugawa era, the Japanese were very closed off from the world for 250 years, once Commodore Perry and the rest of America threatened Japan with war Japan was forced to open ports for trade. Due to the Japanese lack of weapons the trading environment was very biased on the side of America with unequal trade. The shogun was once a Samurai and is now almost in control of Japan.

Read More
687 Words | 3 Pages

Tokugawa Japan + Medieval Europe Medieval Europe and Tokugawa Japan lived in seclusion to each other, and yet there were many uncanny similarities between Tokugawa Japan and Medieval Europe. In Medieval Europe there were many key features of the social system that were introduced at the time. The social system of Medieval Europe was called Feudalism. Feudalism puts the King in charge of everything and everyone, with barons and nobles underneath him. The nobles provide loyalty and knights to the king in return for land to control.

Read More
74 Words | 1 Pages

Feudalism was a social, political, and economic system that tyrannized all conditions of medieval life. Despite what many might think, the European and Japanese feudal systems is well known across hundreds of nations all over the world. This includes the political, economic, and social order. The economic fraction of feudalism was centered around the lord 's estates or manor.

Read More
1412 Words | 6 Pages

Feudalism was a key component of life for those in both Western Europe and Japan. The two systems developed independently from each other yet still held a multitude of similarities. However, their many differences out shadow the unique parallels they shared. The major discrepancies between the two are found in each’s code, structure and regulations. Documents nine and ten, break down the feudal structures of Western Europe and Japan.

Read More
788 Words | 4 Pages

The societies of Tokugawa Japan (c.1603-1867C.E.) and medieval Europe (c.1000-1500C.E.) had two things in common; a feudal system. A feudal system is something that features hierarchies or social structures. The feudal system normally starts with a religion, which is at the very top of the social pyramid, then it’s the King or monarch for Europe and the shogun for Japan, then there are the nobles for Europe and the daimyos for Japan. As we go down the pyramid there are the warriors, like the knight in Europe and the samurai in Japan, then there are the peasants. The peasants were included in both eras and are at the lowest part of the pyramid.

Read More
930 Words | 4 Pages

Knights and samurais both had to follow the rules of these codes and both served great loyalty, making their lives similar to each

Read More
552 Words | 3 Pages

The samurai follows his feudal lord’s orders and never disobeys him, along with knights. However, the samurai shared a greater bond between his feudal lord than a knight

Read More
1403 Words | 6 Pages

Imperialism in Japan Background: Japan prior to the Meiji restoration was ruled in a hierarchy very similar to other European countries. The hierarchy was that of lords, samurai and then peasants. The Japanese equivalent to a king at the time was a military dictator called a shogun. During this time the capital was Kyoto and the shogun was part of the Tokugawa clan. That is why this period is referred to as the Tokugawa Shogunate.

Read More
790 Words | 4 Pages

“To guard against external influence, they also worked to close off Japanese society from Westernizing influences, particularly Christianity. When the Tokugawa shogunate grew increasingly weak by the mid-19th century, two powerful clans joined forces in early 1868 to seize power as part of an “imperial restoration” named for Emperor Meiji.” This restoration was the beginning of the end of feudalism, or the way of structuring society around relationships derived from the holding of land in exchange for service or labour, in Japan. The Tokugawa regime acted to exclude missionaries because of suspicion of foreign intervention and colonialism. Eventually, they issued a complete ban on Christianity in Japan.

Read More

More about Feudal Frontiers: Japan Vs Europe

Related Topics

Open Document