It Cuts Both Ways: Fight Club, Masculinity, and Abject Hegemony. Providing a critical analysis on white masculinity and the hegemonic morals found within David Fincher’s 1999 film Fight Club, this essay exposes crucial tactics through which leadership systems carry on and continue to advance. King explains how and why the idea of becoming everything and nothing simultaneously is a precarious strategy that should be avoided at all costs (2009). She introduces a process of which she has named “abject hegemony”, where masculinity is an informal body whose expansion depends on its capability to open up, double itself, and transgress its own boundaries. Furthermore, she relates this theory of abject hegemony to Fight Club, and how the idea of …show more content…
To understand how persuasive the content of Fight Club can be, it is vital to understand and comprehend the skeleton and inter workings of virility across the board, and King’s in-depth explanation on how masculinity attempts to reproduce its cultural privilege is pertinent.
Virility and vulnerability, splitting and masculinity in Fight Club: a tale of contemporary male identity issues. This critical essay by Ruddell argues that the male body, and its relation to shifting gender roles, has become increasingly used as a tool for dramatic tension through splitting and loss of autonomy in recent psychological horror and fantasy-based texts (2015). She analyzes how Fight Club is a major example of a film that entwines a story about insecurity with issues of gender, and how fragile identities can bloom within personal psychoanalytic issues. In addition, she discusses the narcissistic ideal-ego wanted by the main character and how this ego is in truth a myth, a fantastical representation of