His stories are images of his own experiences in the war, as he is the narrator and main character in most of the stories. Some of his points of view are how war is an ambiguous thing and how it changes people. For instance, in “How to tell a true war story” the author reflects on the feelings of being alive after a fight, proposing that war is hell but also many other things. In O’Brien’s words “You feel an intense, out-of-the-skin awareness of your living self- your truest self, the human being you want to be and then become by the force of wanting it.
Enemies in Vietnam In The Things they Carried Tim O'Brien uses figurative language such as similes to highlight how the act of war drives people into a state of mind where they become crazy and aggressive. In this specific chapter ‘Enemies” he uses the fight between Lee Strunk and Dave Jensen. On page 63 In the Chapter called ‘Enemies; Tim O'Brien uses the title of the chapter to illustrate how much unknown needs to be highlighted when talking about the nature of Vietnam and what it is like fighting in Vietnam.
Although the soldier he killed was an enemy soldier, instead of vilifying him he was able to humanize the man. O’Brien was able to describe the physical appearance of the soldier and imagine her life before war. The author was able to portray an emotional connection and made the line between friend and enemy almost vanish. This was able to reveal the natural beauty of shared humanity even in the context of war’s horror. O’Brien is able to find the beauty in the midst of this tragic and horrible event.
“O'Brien's endeavoring to tell us that albeit they're made up, there's an abundance of truth to their characters. True stories and true characters don't fit orderly into a narrative or into character roles. The best way for O'Brien to communicate his Vietnam experience in “The Things They Carried “is to give us the "story-truth," not the "transpiring-truth" (The Things They Carried Theme of Truth-http://www.shmoop.com/things-they-carried/truth). O’Brien uses story-truth in lieu of transpiring-truth as a way to show the vicissitudes in between authenticity during war time and as a way of making the reader understand the experience
That Stories Tell us about War What do you think Tim O’Brien want his reader to understand about war? He wants his readers to feel an emotional connection to the place that he describes. One of the main things that he wants his readers to feel is emotion. Or the feeling that you have been there.
The novel suggests that it is important to continue to tell stories; by doing so someone’s life lives on, someone’s legacy lives on, someone’s contribution to our world lives on. Through stories, generations of people will learn about tales of survival, triumph, and failure. By listening to the stories in the novel readers are challenged by having to decide whether the author is telling a true war story, based upon its detail, or one that is not true. Tim O’Brien does this by not having a clear fence between non-fiction and fiction, he believed that: “telling stories seemed a natural, inevitable process, like clearing the throat…it was a way of grabbing people by the shirt and explaining exactly what happened to me…all the mistakes id made, all the terrible things I had seen and done”
The narrator O’Brien discusses his personal feelings about the war and tells of his story how he ended up there. He was drafted as like a lot of young men in America at this time, and he tries to avoid going by almost fleeing the country. He decides not to flee, not for himself, or any want or pride to go to the war and fight for his country, but to avoid embarrassment. O’Brien feels if he doesn’t go to the war, he would not be able to take knowing he disappointed his family.
Examples of stories and the way they make people feel are used extensively throughout the novel to explore the question. O’Brien leaves the interpretation of war stories up to the audience as he exposes the different methods of storytelling and allows the tales of war to tell themselves.
O’Brien himself is the principal character-he is Vietnam veteran remembering his encounters during the war, as well as an author who is assessing the techniques behind authoring narratives. Through writing about his encounters in Vietnam, the author’s character is able to find a medium in which he can sort through his emotions, since “by narrating stories, one can objectify individual experience. One can separate it from self. An individual can pin down particular truths”(158). The author does not look upon his narratives as therapy-he narrates his tales since they are part of his history and he is now a direct outcome of them.
It’s ironic that one would want to relive the horrors of war. Traditionally, a veteran would do anything in his power to forget everything he saw and experienced at war. However, for Tim O’Brien, it’s the exact opposite: Storytelling is the way that he copes, the way he keeps the dead alive, and the way he allows for outsiders to feel what he felt during the war. In The Things They Carried, O’Brien portrays the power of storytelling by using it to rehumanize the soldiers during the hardships of war.
The soldiers in the Vietnam War are portrayed as losing themselves in the chaos and trauma of combat. Through the stories of the soldiers and their experiences, O’Brien explores the ways in which war strips away one's sense of identity and humanity. The author himself is depicted as losing himself in the war. O'Brien served in the Vietnam War, and his experiences inspired much of the book. Through the character of Tim O'Brien, the author explores the ways in which war can strip away one's sense of self and purpose.
O’Brien’s intended audience was young people who were not educated about the war and he discussed the themes shame/guilt and mortality/death. The chapter “The Things They Carried” gives an introduction about the men in the group, it also shows shame/guilt. The chapter talks about the equipment each soldier carried and how it affected them. During this chapter it focuses primarily on LT.
In The Things They Carried, O’Brien’s story-telling method is an attempt to show that the lines between fiction and reality are often not that far. Even though the names or details may not be fully accurate, this does not change the fact that they are a reality for many. Additionally, he challenges the importance that we place on war and links it to a storytelling aspect because he’s pointing out that not every story has a moral to it. With tragic events, we typically want some sort of meaning behind them, some sort of assurance that the incident was not for nothing. However, this is not always true, as a character “Yeah, well…I don’t see no moral”…
Using his past experiences as a soldier in Vietnam, O’Brien crafted a narrative that praises the ambiguous art of war-time storytelling and its power to shape the reader’s and/or listener’s perception of actuality. More so, the novel intentionally blends fact and fiction together to make the point that objective truth should retain very little relevance in the grand
He fought a war in Vietnam that he knew nothing about, all he knew was that, “Certain blood was being shed for uncertain reasons” (38). He realized that he put his life on the line for a war that is surrounded in controversy and questions. Through reading The Things They Carried, it was easy to feel connected to the characters; to feel their sorrow, confusion, and pain. O’Briens ability to make his readers feel as though they are actually there in the war zones with him is a unique ability that not every author possess.
