ipl-logo

First Degree Murder Argumentative Essay

719 Words3 Pages

April 3, 2003, Scott Allen Hain is strapped into a gurney in McAlester, Oklahoma. After proper sanitary measures are taken, an IV is inserted into each of his arms. Sodium thiopental inserted first to render him unconsciousness, pancuronium bromide follows to paralyze his muscles and stop his breathing, and last potassium chloride is injected to stop his heart. This was the procedure of the last execution of a minor who had committed murder in the United States. Since the Supreme Court ruling of Roper v. Simmons, it is illegal to execute anyone for a crime committed under the age of 18. Suitable punishments consist of life with or without parole, which I believe is counter intuitive. If a minor is convicted of first degree murder, they should be tried as an adult and sentenced to death, but in any other murder situations they should be given a reasonable amount of jail time depending of the severity of their crimes. First degree murder is defined as “any intentional murder that is willful and premeditated with malice aforethought.”. This type of murder should be …show more content…

In the novel, the murder of Simon is the result of over excitement from the boys while participating in Jack’s dance and chant. Simon emerges from the forest with news that the beast isn’t real and in the heat of the moment the boys attack him and do not realize they’ve killed Simon until it is done. Piggy’s death however is caused by Roger dislodging a large boulder and hitting Piggy in the head. Due to a lack of any form of government or a judiciary department, these crimes go unaccounted for as far as we know. Simon’s death warrants that the boys deserve to serve a minimal amount of time in jail because they believed it was a beast not a man. Roger however deserves the death penalty because we saw early on when he threw stones at Henry that Roger is evil and the deliberate murder of Piggy only solidifies that

Show More
Related
225 Words | 1 Pages

If I were a juror in this case, I would find Janice Leidholm guilty of first degree murder. In order to meet the criteria of first degree murder, premeditation and deliberation must be needed. Although she was abused by her husband, it is not considered as self-defense because he was sleeping when she killed him. However, is she actually deserves to be found guilty of first degree murder?

Read More
962 Words | 4 Pages

He goes into great detail while describing the gruesome murder of Simon. He also uses Pathos to develop Piggy's character. We feel bad for Piggy because he is a genuine human being, and the other boys constantly make fun of him. Golding writes “At once the crowd surged after it, poured down the rock, leapt on to the beast, screamed, struck, bit, tore...blood was staining the sand”(pg.153). This makes the reader feel empathy towards Simon, who has done nothing wrong.

Read More
954 Words | 4 Pages

On Sunday, November 13, 1842 a double murder occurred at Smith Farm in Old Fields, Long Island. The victims, Alexander Smith and and Rebecca Smith, were a wealthy, well- respected married couple who ran Smith farm. George Weeks, the Smiths farmhand, was reporting for work the monday after the murder and heard the dog barking from the work-shed by the Smiths house. George Weeks then became suspicious since the dog was usually inside with Mr. Smith. George then looked in the house and saw that the east room window was broken and Mr. and Mrs. Smith were lying on the floor covered in blood.

Read More
1811 Words | 8 Pages

Simon has a more valiant death than Piggy because he is trying to make everyone aware the beast is not real and is just a hoax. After he finds out the illusion of the beast is not what the boys thought, he tries to bring the parachute to the group, but the irony is the savages mistake him for being the beast and chase after him “The chant rose a tone in agony. They spoke. “Kill the beast! Cut his throat!

Read More
591 Words | 3 Pages

Jury’s Verdict Society must fight against those who rip society apart by breaking laws and acting unethically. Citizens must make the right decisions in order to maintain a healthy community for many years to come. As jury for the trial of Jack Merridew, we have concluded Jack Merridew to be guilty, for he is responsible for the deaths of Simon and Piggy. When deciding an accused person’s fate, there should be no bias involved, since members of the jury have to look at the case from multiple points of view. The factors that suggested Jack Merridew’s guilt include why he and his tribe had not used traps rather than spears, his attempt to murder Ralph, and how the leader should be the one responsible for a group's actions.

Read More
401 Words | 2 Pages

He's innocent and has done no harm, yet the boys kill him. The reader becomes queasy and afraid, beginning to realizes that this violent killing may not only happen to an animal, but to a human too. This foreshadows that the boys may be capable of far more killing an animal. Simon's vicious killing occurs in exactly the same way, and he was just as innocent as the poor sow. This scene also foreshadows his death because the boys killing the pig is their first extreme savage act and their first actions that show that they are no longer civilized.

Read More
902 Words | 4 Pages

However, these boys have been taught right and wrong, and they still do horrible acts because of the evil within them. Although Simon may seem like an outlier because he represents goodness and is a Christ-like figure, he is not born good, he just becomes good out of the knowledge that it is right. When Simon is killed, it is out of pure evil and love of death by Jack and his followers. Besides this, there is no other reason for the boys to kill him. Even seemingly good figures like Ralph and Piggy “Found themselves eager to take a place in this demented but partly secure society” (Golding 152).

Read More
1326 Words | 6 Pages

The Eighth Amendment It’s a late Autumn afternoon and a young fourteen year old boy is told that he has to pay $24,000 bail for stealing a bag of groceries. This is an unreasonable price to pay for the crime he committed. Luckily for us, the Eighth Amendment protects US citizens from unfair situations such as this one. The Eighth Amendment’s meaning and purpose has left an enduring impact on the citizens of the United States of America.

Read More
1392 Words | 6 Pages

When people commit crimes, there should be disciplined no matter what. Juveniles need to learn that their behaviors have consequences. Why should kids be given any less of a punishment for committing the same crime? According to one author, “Taking a life is murder regardless of the age of the offender, and the penalties to be imposed must not discriminate. After all, the victim’s life will never be returned, and the family will permanently lose their loved one” (“7 Top Pros and Cons of Juveniles Being Tried As Adults”).

Read More
483 Words | 2 Pages

Advantage Taken When a person is interrogated, the police do not try to make him comfortable. Their goal is to make him squirm and admit to something, thus leading to a full-blown confession. Episode four of Making a Murderer focused partially on Brendon Dassey. Brendon Dassey simply fell victim to the pressuring of the police.

Read More
728 Words | 3 Pages

1.Society as a whole believes serial killer are evil because that is how the media portrays them. We subconsciously let the media control our thoughts by believing it what they tell us. The media knows the power they have over us when we listen to the news, watching a movie or even reading the newspaper. In the way they report news on serial killers , it promotes fear and anxiety to their viewers. Movies even have more effect than we realize as well .

Read More
1422 Words | 6 Pages

Throughout the years, there have been many controversial cases that deal with justifiable homicide. A justifiable homicide is defined as the killing of a person in circumstances that allow the act to be regarded in law as without criminal guilt. This basically means that someone kills someone else because they feel threatened for their safety or for someone else 's safety around them. The main concept of justifiable homicide stands on a line between an excuse or a justification. In most circumstances, homicides are justified when they prevent greater harm to innocence.

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

Each year in many countries around the world people are murdered in the name of “justice”. But can justice really include a sanitised form of revenge? Many people are for the death penalty regardless of what it actually is. A major way that the death penalty is flawed is shown in the amount of innocent people who are sentenced to death.

Read More
1383 Words | 6 Pages

Capital Punishment is the death penalty for those who commit murder. The thought behind this punishment is a life for a life. There has been debate on if the death penalty is right or wrong. Some poeple want the death penalty to be illegal while others argue it is needed to deter crime. There are many valid arguments regarding the death penalty.

Read More
861 Words | 4 Pages

Waiting in a prison cell for many years, an inmate in death row doesn’t know when his life will come to an end. This is a law under the U.S. government that is allowed to kill people who have committed a crime that’s grave enough. If someone commits a capital crime, they will be punished legally under the law. Taking a rope to the neck, or charging volts to the brain, it’s what people are fighting against today. Organizations are taking action against the death penalty by researching, publishing, and exposing facts whenever officials want to abuse their power with the law.

Read More

More about First Degree Murder Argumentative Essay

Related Topics

Open Document