Fiscal Policy: Stimulation Vs. Restraining
Tax relief for the rich would allow them to spend and invest their money. This spending would fuel the economy and create new jobs. Reagan believed that these tax cuts would ultimately generate more revenue for the federal government. Congress was not as confident as Reagan, but they did approved a 25 percent
Though Reagan and Bush found tax cuts effective for the economy, the budget deficit continues to rise. As President Ronald Reagan takes office in 1981, he proposed tax cuts and reduced non-defense expenditures to increase military spending to Congress. Reagan believed that tax cuts would create more job opportunities for people and increase tax revenue in the long run. Lee et al. (2012) found “The tax cuts adopted in 1997, unlike those of 1981, were accompanied by offsetting expenditure reductions, so there was not as much of a reduction in federal revenue… therefore federal revenues did not increase” (Public Budgeting Systems, p. 74).
The goal was to decrease the budget deficit, stimulate private sector growth, and create more investment and capital formation opportunities. One of the biggest criticisms of Reaganomics is that it made income inequality worse. Critics say that the tax cuts mainly helped rich people, which caused wealth to be concentrated among them and left middle and lower-income earners with low wages. However, supporters argue that these policies actually helped the economy grow, which eventually benefited
Fiscal policy Following the great recession that lasted between December 2007 and June 2009, the federal government undertook several actions to promote growth and development. The government used a fiscal stimulus package worth $787 billion and a bank bailout measure worth $700 billion. In addition, the government passed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 to help create and save jobs. All these measures helped in providing some form of economic relief against the effects of the recession.
Second, Reagan cut taxes for corporations and the wealthy-class. The theory of Reaganomics is tax relief for the rich would enable them to spend more money, save money in banks, and make investments. The additional spending from the rich, was supposed to help stimulate the economy and create new jobs. However, the opposite occurred and America suffered a deep recession in 1981-1982. In addition, the high interest rates caused the value of the dollar to rise on the international exchange market, thus American exports decreased and imports increased.
He tried to use trickle-down economics which creates tax cuts for the wealthy and would allow them to spend and invest more. This spending would spark the economy and create new jobs. Reagan believed it would generate even more revenue for the federal government. Congress was not confident in this policy, but did pass cuts during his presidency. “The top marginal tax rate on individual income was reduced from 70 percent to 28 percent.
This tax relief helped upper-class Americans. Under the Reagan Administration, the tax rate was reduced further to 28% all the while investors were investing at the most $2000 yearly in IRAs (Individual Retirement Accounts) w/o paying taxes. Republicans and conservative Democrats (boll weevils) cut $40 billion from domestic aid programs (food stamps, student loans, mass transportation), but they increased heavily in the military. Despite the cuts to aid programs, he help strengthen Social Security by increasing the amount paid, raising the age for benefits to 67, and taxing some benefits given to upper-class. The Reagan administration reduced business regulations through banks, trusts, and environmental protection, which in turn helped to make the government have a smaller role in people’s lives.
Tax reductions are fine, yet in the event that you are going to cut expenses, government spending needs to diminish also. The impact of this will stream down to common laborers as better occupations, information demonstration this theory does not work. Shortfall spending was another sign of Reagonomics. The federal government spends more than it take in expense incomes, for the most part to fund an extending military spending plan. To finance the obligation, the administration offers Treasury securities and pays the investors interest on these bonds.
First, taxes were cut by 25 percent over three years (Schultz, 2013). Second, cuts were made to social programs such as food stamps, welfare and unemployment. Lastly, he proposed an increase of $1.2 trillion in military spending over five years. The tax cuts, Reagan argued, would allow for new investments which would increase federal revenue. The increase in spending actually caused a rise in the nation’s debt.
After Reagan had been elected president, there was a promise that, “the rate of monetary creation would be slowed to help reduce inflation and interest rates” (Trescott, Page 161). When Reagan promised this, the citizens held him accountable to that and they trusted that he would be able to reduce the national debt and prevent any more money from being spent unnecessarily. This reveals the economy during the 1980’s due to the fact that Americans wanted the cheapest possible lifestyle and Reagan tried to accomplish that. In addition to promising this, Reagan had reduced the income tax from 70% to 28%.
Ronald Reagan himself once remarked, "The best sign that our economic program is working is that they don't call it Reaganomics anymore.” Although there are clear criticisms and disadvantages to the economic approach of Reaganomics, the positive long and short-term effects outweigh the negatives. Reaganomics brought thoughtful policies into effect that positively affected the United States economy; the main ones include tax cuts, reducing government spending, and implementing measures to reduce
history because the government cut taxes for rich Americans. Tax cuts mean that people would be able to keep more of their money instead of giving it to the government. Having more money on hand allows people to spend more. Some invested in stocks. United States History and New York History: Post-Civil War to the Present says that tax cuts would "give the wealthy an incentive to invest... the economy created new, better paying jobs.
Classical economics emphasises the fact free markets lead to an efficient outcome and are self-regulating. In macroeconomics, classical economics assumes the long run aggregate supply curve is inelastic; therefore any deviation from full employment will only be temporary. The Classical model stresses the importance of limiting government intervention and striving to keep markets free of potential barriers to their efficient operation. Keynesians argue that the economy can be below full capacity for a considerable time due to imperfect markets. Keynesians place a greater role for expansionary fiscal policy (government intervention) to overcome recession.
Central thesis – Indian states are not yet ready for full fiscal federalism. (Partial fiscal federalism may be beneficial, but full fiscal federalism might adversely affect economic health and well-being) I) WHAT IS FISCAL FEDERALISM WHAT IS IT?
The fiscal policy is primarily an instrument in the hands of the government whereby it estimates its revenues and expenditures in the economy. This is a very important tool as it would define the flow of money from different sources, indicating the level of activity in the economy. It also defines the broad policies of the government indicating the outwards flow of money in to different sectors of the economy to maintain the overall health of the economy and fulfill its social goals. Apart from the fiscal policy every country has monetary policy at its disposal.
More about Fiscal Policy: Stimulation Vs. Restraining
The Pros And Cons Of Ronald Reagan's Tax Cuts
411 Words | 2 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of Reagan And Bush Tax Cuts
296 Words | 2 PagesReaganomics Pros And Cons
447 Words | 2 PagesFiscal Policy: American Recovery And Reinvestment Act Of 2009
292 Words | 2 PagesEffects Of Reaganomics
156 Words | 1 PagesHow Did Ronald Reagan Affect The Economy
751 Words | 4 PagesPros And Cons Of Proposition 13
1664 Words | 7 PagesJimmy Carter Case Study
1184 Words | 5 PagesWhat Is President Reagan's Domestic Policy?
378 Words | 2 PagesWhat Are The Key Events Of The 1980's
1809 Words | 8 PagesReagannomics Essay
2593 Words | 11 PagesCorruption In The 1920s Essay
467 Words | 2 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of Classical Economics
791 Words | 4 PagesThe Effects Of Fiscal Federalism
794 Words | 4 PagesRoles Of Money In Macroeconomics Essay
1772 Words | 8 Pages