ipl-logo

Food Choices: Should The Government Control The Food?

776 Words4 Pages

There are moments in which some choose to enjoy a succulent candy bar and a refreshing soda, while others choose to eat a fresh cut salad and drink freshly squeezed lemonade. While both of those choices may sound acceptable to each individual, the government does not think so. They believe that there should be less sugary, unhealthy food and more fresh foods available to the consumer. The government should have no control over the food its citizens eat nor should they be able to control the choices that are provided. The government should have no control over the food or food choices that are provided because that limits personal choice. As Americans, we are given the liberty of freedom of speech and choice, in our First Amendment rights. If the government gains control over the production of food and limits what the American consumer can purchase, they may be doing more harm than good. Another way government control of food limits personal choice, is that we as people control what goes in our mouths. We have the ability to go purchase the food we think sounds good at that moment. The government and other officials are always saying, “Make your own choices!” or “Don’t be afraid to stand up for what’s right!” If they continue to push for more food control, they are not practicing what they preach. People …show more content…

In history it is shown that when prohibition hit, alcohol still thrived as an industry; it was just illegal. If people want something, they are going to stop at nothing until they get it. The government can attempt to take away all of the things they want to, but there is no way to completely rid the nation of the foods that don’t fit their guidelines. Even if the government were able to get all the laws passed that would make food up to their standard, the laws would still get

Show More
Related
1404 Words | 6 Pages

As a consumer, we feel that when we go to the store, we have freedom to choose what we want to eat. However, that freedom is limited and we do not even realize it. Stores choose what to have in stock and we are persuaded to buy the things they have. Let us go back to where the food we see today started to evolve.

Read More
662 Words | 3 Pages

Nicholas Confessore, the author of ”How School Lunch Became the Latest Political Battleground”, displays the challenges of transitioning from the old rules to the new rules as part of Michelle Obama’s “Let’s Move!” campaign. It is clear to all parties that childhood obesity is rising at a dangerous rate in America and school lunches are believed to be the necessary first change. Unfortunately, the multiple different parties that are involved in making the changes do not see eye-to-eye. The School Nutrition Association is one of the groups pushing back against the new government policies. Since the SNA is comprised mostly of lunch ladies, they believe the current meals are the healthiest meal most students receive in a given day.

Read More
769 Words | 4 Pages

Just think, no wine.no beer,no whiskey. This is prohibition. The leaders of the prohibition movement were alarmed at the drinking behavior of Americans. The law was ratified by the Federal and state government In January,1919.Prohibition in the United States was a measure designed to reduce drinking by eliminating the businesses that manufactured, distributed, and sold alcoholic beverages. The Eighteenth Amendment (prohibition law) to the United States Constitution took away license to do business from the brewers, distillers, vintners, and the wholesale and retail sellers of alcoholic beverages.

Read More
444 Words | 2 Pages

The amount of unhealthy food consumed in America goes well beyond McDonalds. In fact, you have to go no farther than your local grocery store to find equally as terrible food choices. For example, in recent years the government has put out warnings against eating fat in excess, which lead many big food companies, from yogurt to Wheat Thins, to send out new products with “less fat”. However, products with “less fat” actually have nearly twice as much sugar. Many studies have shown that sugar in excess is much worse than fat.

Read More
1008 Words | 5 Pages

In his article Are You Responsible For Your Own Weight?, policy analyst Radley Balko argues that the Government has no business interfering with what individuals eat. Kelly Brownell, a Yale Chairman, and Marion Nestle a New York University professor state otherwise by arguing that the Government should intervene to create conditions that lead to healthy eating. Balko has a strong argument led with in depth examples, logical support, and credentials to support his tone along with minor fallacies. Kelly Brownell and Marion Nestle fail to go more in depth about her argument, but rely heavily on trying to counter the claims given by the opposing side. The lack of rhetorical devices in her article and inadequate organization weakens her tone as well as the appeal to their audience.

Read More
1447 Words | 6 Pages

By growing more and more corn, to get rid of the surplus, companies have switched to corn sweeteners, and have begun to feed more corn to livestock. “Researchers have found that corn-fed beef is higher in saturated fats than grass-fed beef. ” Capitalism has paved the avenues that allow the government, which is always supposed to be in the public’s best interest, to alter the human diet to such extents that we are now gorging ourselves to our inevitable demise. The American diet is not the only thing that is affected by government

Read More
1610 Words | 7 Pages

In “What You Eat Is Your Business,” Radley Balko tackles the issue of who is responsible for fighting obesity. Balko argues that the controversy of obesity should make the individual consumers culpable for their own health and not the government (467). As health insurers refrain from increasing premiums for obese and overweight patients, there is a decrease in motivation to keep a healthy lifestyle (Balko 467). As a result, Balko claims these manipulations make the public accountable for everyone else 's health rather than their own (467). Balko continues to discuss the ways to fix the issue such as insurance companies penalizing consumers who make unhealthy food choices and rewarding good ones (468).

Read More
930 Words | 4 Pages

While one of the intended purposes of Prohibition was to reduce crime, Prohibition actually resulted in increased crime. “For every prohibition you create, you also create an underground.”, said Jello Biafra. Outlawing something like alcohol would only lead to people brewing, buying, and selling alcohol illegally. “The growth of the illegal liquor trade under Prohibition made criminals of millions of Americans” (Lerner “Prohibition). If brewers and buyers were caught, they would be arrested, which also increased prison population.

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

A world without alcohol is hard to believe. Most of today 's society wouldn’t be able to wrap their head around it. In the United States prohibition was a nationwide ban on the production, importation, transportation, and sale of alcoholic beverages it remained in place from 1920 to 1933. When the 18th amendment was passed in the year 1919 America was asking for chaos. With everything that affected the United States during prohibition, it is because of the increase in crime, weak enforcement, lack of respect for the law, and economic suffrage that the 18th amendment was repealed.

Read More
490 Words | 2 Pages

In both David Zinczenko’s “Don’t Blame The Eater” and “ Radley Balko’s “What You Eat is Your Business”, the argument of obesity in America is present and clear from opposing viewpoints. Both articles were written in the early 2000’s, when the popular political topic of the time was obesity and how it would be dealt by our nation in the future. While Zinczenko argues that unhealthy junk food is an unavoidable cultural factor, Balko presents the thought that the government should have no say in it’s citizens diet or eating habits. Zinczenko’s article was written with the rhetorical stratedgy of pathos in mind.

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

By comparing what is, to what could be possible if a food policy were to be established. In doing so, he is using a scare tactic for readers to visualize the reality that is impacting Americans today. Pollan emphasizes the need to prevent deaths caused by unhealthy eating as a priority. Pollan's goal is aimed at "a food system in which healthful choices are accessible to all and in which it becomes possible to nourish ourselves without exploiting other people or nature. " Pollan has earned respect by readers due to his concern for the greater good of Americans.

Read More
816 Words | 4 Pages

Although alcoholic consumption was reduced by more than 50%, the government did not want to give funds to enforce the law, causing corruption in law enforcement agencies. Many Americans believed government did not have the right to outlaw alcohol consumption, especially because drinking was a part of many ethnic celebrations. People thought taxing alcohol

Read More
995 Words | 4 Pages

We have the right to choose what to eat, when to eat, and with who. There is no better solution than to eat our own that will not make it to the ethereal living that this great nation is known for eating at. We make our choices. We make our food. We are not outsourcing to foreign nations to obtain their lesser and degraded choices of food.

Read More
656 Words | 3 Pages

Americans today are well-known for their eating habits. With all the options the food industry gives us it makes it hard to go to the grocery store and resist picking up that bag of barbeque-flavored chips or blueberry flavored candy. Due to these processed foods obesity is a growing epidemic in our country and who is to blame for it? In an article entitled “What You Eat is Your Business” by Radley Balko, Balko argues for less government intervention. Balko believes is it our responsibility to take care of ourselves and make it a priority.

Read More
1668 Words | 7 Pages

People need to take initiative to stop eating food that’s not healthy for them because at the end of the day it’s all up to you to stay healthy. Our country become less responsible for their own health and start to blame everyone else for their own health but look at us not eating right and wondering why they are not feeling good, you’re not doing the right thing. This world is full of

Read More

More about Food Choices: Should The Government Control The Food?

Related Topics

Open Document