ipl-logo

Forensic Psychological Analysis

1368 Words6 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Paper on forensic psychology practicew

Forensic psychology is a part of psychology that deals more with legal matters than academic or clinical materials. For the past century, Forensic psychology has been widespread in the popular culture, particularly in the media due to its role as the intersection between law and psychology. Movies and TV shows serves as the general source of information to the public about legal procedures. Thus the portrayal of forensic psychology in media creates an impact to the beliefs of most people. Primal fear, a movie directed by Gregory Hoblit in 1996, succeeds to portray the parallel of opinions of the public and the lawyers on insanity defense, raises doubts on the expert witnesses in courts and fails to present the real legal proceeding of the court.
The …show more content…

Journal Of Clinical Psychology, 49(3), 435-440. Retrieved from EbscoHost
Cirincione, C., Steadman, H. J., & McGreevy, M. A. (1995). Rates of insanity acquittals and the factors associated with successful insanity pleas. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 23(3), 399-409.
Ferguson, G. (2015). Criminal Liability and Criminal Defenses. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. (2nd ed). doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.86147-4
Giorgi-Guarnieri, D., Janofsky, J., Keram, E., Lawsky, S., Merideth, P., Mossman, D. & Zonana,
H. (2001). AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 30(2 Suppl), S3-40.
Grachek, J. E. (2006). Insanity Defense in the Twenty-First Century: How Recent United States
Supreme Court Case Law Can Improve the System, The. Ind. LJ, 81, 1479.
Hans, V. P. (1986). An analysis of public attitudes towards the insanity defense.
Criminology, 24(2), 393-414. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1986.tb01502.x
Hans, V. P. & Slater, D. (1983). John hinckley, jr. and the insanity defense: The

Show More
Related
153 Words | 1 Pages

On November 19, 1898, Ariel Tritondatter was arrested on the felony charges of first- degree murder and breaking & entering. An arraignment was later held on November 22, 1898, which Ariel Tritondatter was informed about the charges she was faced with. Additionally, Ariel Tritondatter soon entered a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity Ariel Tritondatter’s criminal trial was set in the Circuit Court with both a jury and a judge called “Syed Ahmed Khan”. The defendant, Ariel Tritondatter, almost didn’t converse throughout the trial, but soon she took a stand to defend herself.

Read More
1618 Words | 7 Pages

How Ted Kaczynski’s mental state was depicted in court affects the support of the public for his defense. Another motive for pursuing a mental illness defense was the implications for sentencing. If Kaczynski was found guilty, the use of mental illness could be a mitigating factor to potentially sway the jury into imposing less severe sentencing. However, Kaczynski was not in favor of being labeled mentally ill by his lawyers. While there were benefits to pursuing a mental illness defense, that defense would undermine his credibility and suggest that he was not responsible for his actions.

Read More
350 Words | 2 Pages

When it comes to the case Miller V. State, I believe that trial court refused to give the jury instructions regarding the insanity defense, which the defendant wished to have comunicated, because they wanted the jury to be able to decide imoartially. Miller was examined by three medical experts and they concluded that Miller satisfied the M'naughten insanity test when he stabbed Goring. The district court had instructed the jury to determine whether Miller was actually legally insane when he stabbed Goring. They wanted the jury to find proof of insanity at that time, and to also consider Miller's mental condition "before and after the killing to throw light on what Miller's mental condition was at the time of the killing" (Schmalleger

Read More
1099 Words | 5 Pages

A properly trained Forensic Psychologist is needed to make a proper evaluation of a potentially insane defendant in any case where insanity is suspected. This is a necessary area of specialty for psychology, leading to the formation of Forensic Psychologists, because of the demand for such evaluations. This case is significant because it led to the formation of a niche for psychologists to specialize in. Competency evaluations for insanity are a big part of legal cases because of this case pertaining to potentially insane defendants. There are several crimes where an evaluator is needed to decipher the competence of whether an individual is insane because the insanity plea has become a common one.

Read More
935 Words | 4 Pages

Dr. Mark Nolan, Senior Lecturer at ANU College of Law, says that the NGRI plea “enables defendants to avoid criminal liability and standard criminal punishment” (Nolan 8). The main disagreement with America is the focus whether if the “guilty defendant” pursues to misuse the “Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity” as an alternative to imprisonment or if the criminally accused was at the time of committing the crime “clinically insane” and in need psychotherapy. Therefore, during this discussion of opposing viewpoints concerning the insanity defense being misused or ethical are going to be

Read More
547 Words | 3 Pages

Those matters are for the trier of fact alone. Id. In this criminal case a mental health expert is prepared to offer an opinion on the whether the defendant was insane

Read More
1428 Words | 6 Pages

Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 2(4), i-109. Greene, E., & Heilbrun, K. (2011). Wrightsmans psychology and the legal system (7th ed.). 20 Davis Drive Belmont, CA 94002 USA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. Thompson-Cannino, J., Cotton, R., & Torneo, E. (2010).

Read More
894 Words | 4 Pages

John White, the author of “Guilty Is Guilty, Insane or Not” an article written in The New York Times, creates an argument that he is clearly passionate about but also an argument that lacks substance. Published on February 25, 1979, the article is written during a time period where law and psychology were being introduced to each other. John White conceives an argument that when a plaintiff enters an insanity defense and is found not guilty by reason of insanity or mental defect, he or she is virtually getting away with murder. This argument he presents is highly vague, has no evidence, and is also premature due to the changes within the legal system during this time. John White states in paragraph three “Consider murder trials in which

Read More
2397 Words | 10 Pages

According to Smith, the recognition of mental illnesses have forced the courts to question legal culpability (6). For example, the 1724 case Rex v. Arnold introduced the principle of “proof of insanity as an exemption from intent” (Smith 6). This led to the adoption of the “Durham Criterion,” in which the courts find that the defendant is not legally responsible if they are proven to have “substantial incapacity to conform to the law” (Smith 13). If we compare the legal history of mental illness to Szasz’s claims that mental illness is a myth, the legal treatment of psychopathy can be shown as another form of toleration. Szasz states that the myth of mental illness functions to create a “social intercourse [that] would be harmonious, satisfying, and the secure basis of a good life” (96).

Read More
1086 Words | 5 Pages

“Honesty is the best policy, but insanity is a better defense.” according to Steve Landsberg. The insanity plea, although helpful in some cases, can be abused by a multitude of convicted criminals looking for an effortless trial. The first example of the insanity defense ever being used during a court case would be in the 1843. When Daniel M’Naughten tried to assassinate the prime minister of Britain, he was put on trial and was later acquitted due to being found not guilty by reason of insanity.

Read More
898 Words | 4 Pages

Madness is found everywhere: on the streets, in our neighborhoods, and even in our own families. It is believed to be fairly common that a plea of insanity is brought into the courtroom as a means of justifying some heinous crime. Under that assumption, it is reasonable to conclude that a large proportion of convicted murderers plead insanity to escape the ultimate punishments for their crimes. In reality, less than one percent of felony cases result in a successful plead of insanity (Cevallos). In "The Cask of Amontillado," Edgar Allan Poe tells the tale of the fictional death of Fortunato at the hand of Montresor.

Read More
543 Words | 3 Pages

Penal institutions in America are already over packed making it harder for the prison guards to look out for everyone. Mental diseases such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder can make it hard to control for their thoughts and actions, which results in them committing malicious crimes, such as murder. But, these personas do not know that they are doing something terribly wrong. Because of this, they sometimes end up in prison. But with the insanity plea, the accused have a chance in defending themselves.

Read More
620 Words | 3 Pages

The insanity defense is a compromise between society and the justice system. Used to give an excuse for the criminal's crime, it takes in account both the crime committed, as well as the criminal's mental illness. In society,

Read More
312 Words | 2 Pages

If an insanity plea is successful, it can be implied that mental illnesses can be dangerous or harmful. Also, that the person with the mental illness is going to be treated and hopefully learn how to handle such an illness. Then perhaps that person can go free after a while. On the other hand, if an insanity plea is unsuccessful, then it can be implied that the person with the illness may not get treatment. Although, if the person is just using a mental illness as an excuse, then he or she is giving other people with a mental illness a bad name.

Read More
924 Words | 4 Pages

Findings from this project will result in at least one peer-reviewed international publication, and will be presented in international psychology and law conferences. Further, the findings will be disseminated to police, judges and expert witnesses working in the field of Legal Psychology at meetings including the annual International Investigative Interviewing Research Group conference and the Forensic Psychology Update conference in Maastricht. Both events are attended by police and legal practitioners and provide a platform for researchers to deliver their findings directly to end-users. Furthermore, the section of Forensic Psychology that the applicant is a member of, maintains a well-respected and highly visited blog where our findings could be posted. Finally our findings will be disseminated to the general public with the use of newspaper articles.

Read More

More about Forensic Psychological Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document