I am also inspired by the methodologies in this book. The author surveys and quotes a considerable amount of private diaries/letters, as well as newspapers, magazines, and theater advertisements. The amount of work that the author did to convey his argument is impressed. And fist hand materials, including diaries, advertisements, and news reports are more convincing and easier to be understood. This methodology helps a wider reader group to digest the author 's argument, which is especially helpful for readers that have little knowledge on art history or the history of America.
Another formal element I noticed is shape. In Gare Montparnasse (The Melancholy of Departure) Giorgio relies heavily on geometric shapes. The painting has very straight lines and incorporates a lot of normal shapes. For example, the pillars are rectangular as well as the walls.
What do you do when you lose something? Well, Elizabeth Bishop wrote “One Art” to mock how people cannot accept or get over a loss of something. Elizabeth Bishop, used rhyme, meter, and language and structure. Elizabeth Bishop used rhyming to help mock the idea of loss. In line 1 the speaker says, “The art of losing isn’t hard to master.”
DBQ “What a piece of work is man!” (Doc. B). After the middle ages, and after the Black plague, and fighting had begun to die down, Europe had started a new era. The Renaissance, people had begun to look up to the sky and began to think about the world around them. People began to question authority, and look at the things around them, and make new resources.
And furthermore, recognize the symbolism documented in the painting for iconographic analysis. In doing so, this will highlight and comment on important characteristics of Omnibus Life in London as it yields new information regarding the emerging shift in social inequality. Through formal analysis, the visual characteristics of the work present an interesting insight into the painting. The first emotion that I experienced with this work was claustrophobia and crowdedness. Part of the feeling spawned from the three-dimensionality of the painting.
The two pieces of art I will discuss is Edouard Manet’s ‘Olympia’ and Mary Cassatt 's ‘Woman in Black at the Opera’. Manet’s Olympia was not critically accepted, the reaction to his painting was negative, only four critics out of sixty were favorably disposed to Olympia. Olympia was a derivative of Titian 's Venus. In 1863 the critics and the viewers didn’t know how to take Olympia, “they were unable to cope with so many novel factors and so they were unable to categorize the picture and so were unable to analyze it or understand it in any context” (Laurence, 2012). Nowadays we are more open minded and are able to see the painting in a different light.
1. The linked article above begins with three main questions for art historical inquiry. What are they? Why does a work of art look the way it does? Who made it and why?
An initial reaction to this artwork is a feeling of mourn with an explosion of emotions. At first, the artwork serves as a symbol of sorrow, despair, and melancholy. The title of the work adds a dry, bland sense to the meaning behind the drawing. Through observing the drawing more strenuously, the work becomes more of a symbol of war and a cry for help. The despair and troublesome times that the working class went through during war is characterized in this artwork.
Modern art takes the best of artists and their art work and adapts it, adding new techniques and personal styles of each. When one carefully analyzes different pieces of art with openness to emotional impression and introspection it allows appreciation and pleasure towards other artists as well as their works. This paper will provide information on the artist Paul Cézanne and his work The Large Bathers, look into Matisse’s Bonheur de Vivre (Joy of Life) and Picasso’s Les Demoiselles d’Avignon. It will also discuss the influence Paul Cézanne had on the aforementioned artists upon producing their masterpieces. Paul Cézanne, The Large Bathers, 1906, oil on canvas, 210 x 250.8 cm (Philadelphia Museum of Art)
Art Nouveau was an international style of modern art and promoted the idea of art and design as part of everyday life, an idea that I will elaborate in this essay. The aim of this essay is to understand and locate an object within a historical context by identifying
Thousands of paintings and sculptures were made in these periods of time. In this essay, I will imagine myself being a curator of an art gallery that has a Greek room, a Roman room, an Early Christian room, a Gothic room, a Renaissance room, and a Baroque room. I will select two pieces for each room and discuss why I would put those paintings and sculptures in each room at the gallery. I will explain two pieces that I would place in the Greek room at the gallery. The first piece is a painting called "Amphora".
From the above, we can see the essential role played by the capitalist society and its relation to the theory of Marxist aesthetics under the discussion of Marxism. To develop a further understanding in the art history related to Marxism, the materialist art history should also not to be missed out in the context of Marxist aesthetics. From the point of view of Marx and Engels, they believed that the forms of society is the most hostile to art when the society is developed into industrial capitalism in a full way, while the division of material labor and mental labor may have to go through the point of extremeness. (Klingender, 1943) The art history of materialism has focused on the production modes of art, in the other words, the labor of
In this essay, I will firstly introduce the general account of the art market in the 20th century, including the historical background, significant development of the art market. Then, analyze its art market changes influenced by the social issues in the 20th century, including globalization, art auction and the modern art movement as well as reflecting the actual value with theoretical support. Lastly, is a brief conclusion. 20th century art is almost indefinable, and ironically we generally consider that as its definition. This make sense, as we live in a world that is in a constant state of flux.
Impressionism was not only about the specific colors and art based on empirical analysis and the senses, but mainly about the freedom and rather than a specified movement, it is collection of artists who rebelled against conventional art forms and each of them had their own unique style; their ‘freedom’ being the most common factor which bound them together. The lack of lines, one of the principles in which impressionism differed from previous styles. The impressionists preferred to use natural brushstrokes, without any lines to border their creative vision, and these strokes appeared to be ‘broken’ to the unaccustomed eye. The movement which followed impressionism was post-impressionism.
This research was carried out not to only show awareness toward the society but also why people should take art seriously. Often times, we can see lots of people debating whether art is important or not. This happened because the lack of exposure and knowledge that has been taught to them. Art can help to shape the society and affect the society to broaden their view of perspective in life by referring on the artworks because each work of art can give different meanings to life.
