Ambivalence And Slavery During The Deep Southern States

Ambivalence is the best description that can be given to the ideological positions that were held by Founding Fathers and Jefferson on the American slavery. On one position, it can be argued that founding fathers had more focus on creating the Union as opposed to engaging in property rights and by their vision of miscegenation and race wars. Conversely, founding fathers embraced revolutionary ideologies that would emancipation a possible occurrence. The question often asked is how their indecisiveness on slavery practically came to play. The answer herein is that whenever founding fathers were dogged with dangers of racial order, property rights, and the Union, the often did very little to subvert the situation. It can be noted that during the Deep Southern States crises, there was no significant action from the founding fathers . The striking resemblance in their action is that whenever

For instance, in Virginia, the set slave prices and frenzied racial fears made liberalization a farfetched dream. During his time as the legislator, Jefferson did more than affirm his commitment to abolitionist resolves. However, his revision of the Virginian slave’s code had little effect on easing the burden that slavery had on the African American. This did very little in addressing the plight of black slaves and their freedom . For instance, Jefferson banished a white lad who sired a black baby to leave the state of Virginia lest she is placed out of the protection laws. This further affirms how difficult it was to overcome slavery in Virginia. Additionally, Southern Virginia had slave pricing and proceeds from such sales higher than those of stable food which further hindered any attempt for freedom . People with land tracts of farmlands in the southern Carolina and Georgia posit that ending slavery would adversely affect their farm proceeds