Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Transactional leadership theory essay
Transactional leadership
Transactional leadership theory essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Transactional leadership theory essay
Leaders lead by motivating, directly, and influence the workers to achieve Target’s goals. Give incentives, and bonuses
PMPG 5501 Team Assignment Assignment #: 1 Date Submitted: Friday Jan 16 2015 Team #6 Team Leader: Pratik Patel Team Members (full names): Nimish Thakur Dilip Bhatija Introduction The purpose of this assignment is to distinguish clearly between leaders and managers. We have answered the following questions in this assignment.
1. The Relational Leadership Model is a relational process of people together attempting to accomplish change or make a difference to benefit the common good. The Relational Leadership Model involves five primary components, which are inclusive, purposeful, ethical, process oriented, and empowering. 2. My group implemented some of the components of the Relational Leadership Model in our presentation.
In conclusion, we must have strong leaders to run a strong company. I portray a more participative style of leadership, tending to involve followers and decision-making. Leadership styles can change depending on the situation in these needs to be taken into consideration. Becoming a leader takes a strong individual who is able to gain the respect of its followers and point them in the right
I have learned through my experiences at the Non-Commissioned Officer Academy that I prefer to use the Management by Exception-Passive (MBE-P) leadership behavior. I realized on more than one occasions that I leave my subordinates to complete their tasks on their own since I usually justify it to myself that they are capable and self-sufficient Staff Sergeants. I realize this is an ineffective approach since my subordinates will perform at the level I display and the standards I set during our feedback sessions. I know I have Idealized Influence because my supervisor recognizes that I display a high level of moral behavior and a strong work ethic. Additionally, my subordinates recognize that I apply Intellectual Stimulation because I value
It relies on a paradigm of quid pro quo, reward for success and punishment for failure. Rewards can include praise, compensation, and recognition. Punishment could include a verbal scolding, demotion, or extra work. Therefore, subordinates are motivated primarily by their own self-interest. Leaders using this model are focused on setting expectations, measuring performance, and rewarding or punishing subordinates accordingly.
Transactional Leadership is based on the principles of the social exchange theory, in which an individual would expect to give and receive benefits or rewards when engaging in a social interaction (Sullivan, 2012). The interaction will cease if one or both person decides that the exchange of benefits and rewards are no longer worthwhile. Transactional Leadership theory also focus on the task that need to be carried out and makes sure they are done the right way as compared to Transformational Leadership theory which focus on staff empowerment (Marquis and Huston, 2015). A nurse manger in a department or ward is a good example of Transactional Leadership theory.
The second theory-based change that I could make is handling conflict with a smile. This is related to the service leadership theory because all leaders deal with conflict (Daft, 2014). I have to learn that conflict is nothing personal, it’s just business. Maybe a smile isn’t always appropriate, but stress isn’t worth it.
Many people misunderstand the role of a manger and a leader. The purpose of this essay is to explain what path-goal theory of leadership is, to identify the four styles of leadership styles of path goal theory, and to explain when they are most appropriately used. Ogbeide (cited in Obbeide 2011) defines that no matter what type of leadership styles are practiced, leadership mainly involves a powerful relationship between leaders and followers to accomplish a specific goal. According to Williams, McWilliams & Lawrence (2017) leaders are concerned with doing the right things like getting the most output with the least amount of inputs, while managers are concerned with doing things right and completing activities so that organisational goals are attained. Organisations need both managers and leaders.
The term "transactional" refers to the fact that this type of leader essentially motivates subordinates by exchanging rewards for performance. A transactional leader generally does not look ahead in strategically guiding an organization to a position of market leadership; instead, these managers are solely concerned with making sure everything flows smoothly today. Advantages As stated above both leadership styles are needed for guiding an organization to success, and it was thanks to that approach that Fight Club was such a successful organization.
Transactional or Transformational Leadership Style Gates was both a transactional and transformational leader. As a transactional leader, he made sure to visit the new products teams and inquire challenging questions to the point that would make him satisfied and ensure that the team are on track and have a clear understanding about the aimed goal (Pamela Spahr, 2014). He is well known for his emphasis on rigid structure, hierarchy and his system of reward and punishment to achieve outcomes. His strict standards of what he wants is what made Microsoft successful and he ensures that his employees do not deviate from these standards (‘’Mindvalley academy blog’’, n.d.). In addition, Gates has a transformational leadership style.
There were transactional and transformational were found to have direct relationship with employees’ job satisfaction. There is a lot of research conducted focusing on transformational leadership among employees’ in organization. Transformational leadership is a style that motivates followers by appealing to higher ideals and moral values (Katherine J.Barker and SUNY Fredonia, 2007). Besides that, according to Avolio, Bass, and Jung (1997) there are four dimensions of transformational leadership. There are idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation and individualized consideration (M.L. Voon, M.C. Lo, K.S. Ngui and N.B. Ayob
Transactional Leadership Frequently referred to as a managerial approach to leadership, the transactional leadership style is centered on improving efficiencies within an organization or team (McShane & Von Glinow, 2015). Leaders practicing the transactional approach focus on the details of the step by step processes and workflows using a reward and punishment system to encourage workgroup production (Dartey-Baah, 2015). As errors and inconsistent results are part of the expected norm, transactional leaders succumb to the belief that employees require ongoing monitoring and supervision to ensure compliance with the expected work practices. When used with an experienced high performing staff, the constant supervision and punitive nature of the transactional leadership style can be counterproductive, causing a decrease in production and satisfaction among some groups. In contrast, when used with newly formed production units, the transactional style has been known to improve employee engagement and response (Breevaart et al., 2014).
If the behavior theory can identify the key determinants of leadership, people can actually train to become a leader. This is the premise of the management development plan. There are many different types of behavioural leadership styles. Each style suggests that the leadership role is based on the leaders’ concern for the people being led and the level of achievement that needs to be
In this regard, leaders and managers can appear at any level of an organisation and are not exclusive of each other (Germano, 2010). Leadership theories identify leaders based upon traits as well as how their influence and power is used to achieve organizational goals and objectives (Germano, 2010). As such, trait based characteristics include leaders such as autocratic, democratic, bureaucratic and charismatic. On the other hand, leadership that is viewed from the perspective of the exchange of power and its utilisation to secure outcomes, are situational, transactional and transformational leaders (Germano, 2010). It is of paramount importance to consider the different types of theories of management and leadership and their potential impact on organizational strategy being that management and leadership plays a vital role in the success of businesses.