ipl-logo

Framers Of Constitution

467 Words2 Pages

Explain why the framers of the United States Constitution ultimately decided to give more power to the federal government rather than the state governments, be sure to include the Federalist and Antifederalist views of the outcome. One of the topics I will be talking about is the problems the Articles of Confederation had. Another is the Federal government and the State government. The last topic I will talk about is what does the constitution say about Federal and state powers. Are you for or against how the United States Constitution decided to give more power to the Federal government than the state government. The Articles of Confederation were created as the first official government of the United States. It was based largely on the concept of the state government having greater power than the national congress. What started out being a good thing ended up having a lot of weaknesses. One general weakness is no executive branch to enforce the acts of congress. Another weakness is no national government. One of the strengths is it created the first official government of the United States.
The federal government is a nation that is ruled by a central government under these smaller community of government. It is a two tiered system of government. One thing that the federalist were for was a strong federal …show more content…

This is what the anti- federalist wanted because it would help the poor more, and it would make more sense to have the state you live in make the rules instead of some other state. The federalist didn’t want the state government because they felt that the national government should have complete and positive authority. The state government helped the poor people like the farmers,debtors, and small landowners. The state government didn’t help the rich people like the judges, lawyers, and merchants. Some of the people who supported the state government was Thomas Jefferson and James

Show More
Related
302 Words | 2 Pages

How did the Constitution Guard against Tyranny? It was say in the background story for this was that, they had 55 individuals all responding to all its constitution. How did the Constitution Guard against the Tyranny? Was it maybe becausre some states are bigger than others?

Read More
307 Words | 2 Pages

Why did the Framers of the United States ultimately decide to give more power to the Federal Government rather than the state governments? There were many problems and weaknesses with the Articles of Confederation. Some of the weaknesses was that congress did not have the power to tax, couldn’t regulate trade between the states or foreign countries. They had no National court system, the articles could not be amended without the commitment of all 13 colonies. Despite all the problems and weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation there were some good things about it or “strengths”, like it created the first official government of the United States, and the state had no authority to tax or regulate state-to-state trade.

Read More
807 Words | 4 Pages

Did the Framers intend for federal or state governments to be supreme in the federal system? How has the balance of power between state and federal governments shifted? Why have these changes occurred? During the creation of the United States government, the framers of the Constitution put their trust and devotion into the hands of Federalism.

Read More
450 Words | 2 Pages

SIMULATED CONGRESSIONAL HEARING SPEECH QUESTIONS Unit Three - What happened at the Philadelphia Convention? 1. Because of different economic systems, Northern and Southern states had different interests. These conflicting interests led to disagreements at the Philadelphia Convention. • Describe at least two disagreements between Northern and Southern states at the Convention.

Read More
431 Words | 2 Pages

Question 1: Based on what is know of the colonies and their self-government, why would written constitutions and representative government appeal to state citizens and the Founding Fathers? The written constitution appealed to the founding fathers because they understood for the new nation to be successful the nation would essentially need a set of rules. As for why representative government appealed to the people is because of past experiences. The colonies has no representation in parliament and this would also be one of the reasons the colonies would want to break away from England.

Read More
133 Words | 1 Pages

Federalist’s ideas about functions of the central government encompassed a national appeal that influenced adoption of the constitution. They convinced the delegates that a strong national government was capable of ensuring equitable resource sharing. By quoting the gaps in the Articles of Confederation, the Federalists expressed the concern that passing the constitution would address the highlighted inefficacies to make American a sustainable nation. Also, Federalists were open to new ideas including the consideration of the bill of rights. Contrariwise, the Antifederalists did not prosper in the mission to convince the delegates to oppose the constitution that provided supreme powers to the national government (Hamilton, Madison and Jay 67).

Read More
585 Words | 3 Pages

The Articles of Confederation were very weak. One weakness of the Articles of Confederation were that Congress could not tax the colonists, “...did not give the national

Read More
778 Words | 4 Pages

The Articles of the Confederation was the first government constitution that the United States used, and, although there were strength like the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, there were major weaknesses of the Articles of the Confederation like the following: requiring 9 out of the 13 colonial votes from the representatives from different states to pass a law; having no executive and judicial branch; and the federal government being unable to impose tax revenue onto the states. Such flaws would eventually lead to the Constitution and the repeal of the articles, for the Constitution was a measure to fix the problems of the articles with a stronger government that allowed them to impose taxes and and implement new laws for a more effective government.

Read More
724 Words | 3 Pages

Since the United States was relatively a new nation, it needed some form of organization to hold the states together and keep its government and society stable to build a stronger economy (Knoedl, 2003). The first and foremost inherited weakness of the Articles came from the fact that it replaced sovereign power in the hands of the states. This started after the American Revolution, when the American people feared that the colonists would form a new government that could function similarly to King George III’s monarchy after having dealt with the British Crown for years. Since then these states would start creating their own set of rules and laws and because of some states, creating their own constitutions and each state can rule itself, it gave more power to them than the actual Federal Government.

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

In one hand, the Articles of Confederation had a weak central government, differing form the strong central government in the Constitution. The Constitution’s government had a structure of three different branches; the legislative, executive, and judicial branch; unlike the Articles of Confederation that had no structure whatsoever. The Articles of Confederation had many problems like, the poor international trade, poor foreign relations and a weak economy in contrast to the Constitution that only had one problem, the struggle over the ratification. the Articles of Confederation achieved the Northwest Ordinance and the Northwest Territory and according to a history website, the Constitution achieved that we had a system of checks and balances, that we had a bill of rights, and, eventually, the survival of a bloody civil war intact. Lastly, the Constitution had three compromises: the Great Compromise, the Three-Fifths Compromise and the Slave Trade compromise.

Read More
339 Words | 2 Pages

Question two Based on the reading I think the framers succeeded in attempting to create a government that was strong, but not too strong. They did so by creating a government based on the division of power. Due to how the framers set up the constitution of the United States, the constitution allows the government to work for the people and not to control the people. My understanding is that we have a federal system of government which divides the powers of government between the federal government, state, and local governments.

Read More
1823 Words | 8 Pages

This country was founded with the attempt to separate the federal government and the state government, known as federalism. The goal of federalism is to divide the power of state and federal governments, protect the rights of the state, and prevent tyranny of the majority. Throughout the years, federalism turned into dual federalism where the state and federal government were completely independent of each other and only shared a dependency on the Constitution. The united states suppressing now to cooperative federalism, the national government has assumed even more power, overruling the states with Supreme Court decisions and actions, and executive Orders. Furthermore, the Federal government should grant their state governments more power, due to the connection the state governments hold with their local people.

Read More
333 Words | 2 Pages

The preamble promised to give you freedom it also promises you security and defence. The U.S. government does live up to the promises made in the Preamble based on our system of liberty and justice , the freedom of union, and the life of a U.S. citizen. In order to, “ordain and establish this Constitution for the united states of America, “ the Framers of the Constitution created checks and balances. Check and balances is when one branch checks the other branch so that the branch would not have to much power.

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

The Articles of Confederation were a document seen as the “first” constitution of the United States. This document granted the new national government power to control the military, declare war, and create treaties between the states. However, the Articles had holes in it considering the government did not have the power to tax, create laws without at least nine states’ approval, or change the Articles of Confederation without a unanimous vote. This means that the country soon fell into debt and petty arguments between state, the new government had no control. It was time for a change.

Read More
540 Words | 3 Pages

You may be wondering “what is federalism?”,Federalism is in fact a federal principle or system of government. Federalism has existed in the America ever since the creation of the states. Creating a national government was hard because the power of the of the states and national government were a constant debate. The main point of a federalist government is to avoid tyranny which is a cruel and oppressive government or rule. And to allow people to have more of a say in the way their government is run.

Read More

More about Framers Of Constitution

Related Topics

Open Document