Frankenstein

Should We Placing Limits on Scientific Research

We’re in the process of a great historic that will turn into the Biotech Age. We can clearly compare the past and now of how scientist have suck a huge role in our culture. It has change the way we live and the way we think about human and nature. Science has been compliment in created a new technology that help our live easy but it also been blamed for harm our environment. Therefore, Science can bring human many benefit for our live and the environment, but it also very dangerous if the new scientific discoveries or invented are not properly inspect by scientists, take a look at the example of Frankenstein. Should we placing limits on scientific research to prevent the tragedy of Frankenstein to happen in the future.

It true that science has help solve, provide solutions to many question by human that not yet to be answered and remove our fears. Michael Bishop has said in “Enemies of Promise” that” Science is the art of the possible, the dissolution” For example, without science there would be man in the moon, no electric city or running water. We would not have paper to write on, no TV to follow the new, no internet to realize there are so many things to thing,

And in the end, he created a monster that are so dangerous to be living with human. Today, many scientists are facing the same problem like Victor. They are not concern about the process of their development on their new idea or the result of their creation. They want to accomplish what they want without knowing that it may create a disaster for human and environment. For example, the scientists that create genetic organisms want to create something that will help the famer to save a few bucks, but they don’t realize that their creation can cause so much problem to the