Women’s rights is a highly controversial subject in today’s society. In the speeches “Is it a Crime for a Citizen of the United States to Vote?” by Susan B. Anthony and “Freedom or Death” by Emmeline Pankhurst, women’s rights are the main issue discussed. Anthony’s speech fights clear as day for women’s rights, while Pankhurst calls out the government on their discrimination towards women. While Emmeline Pankhurst’s speech was more effective than Susan B. Anthony, they both strongly expressed their opinion. Susan B. Anthony’s speech fights for the rights of women through the use of ethos. She refers to the constitution throughout her speech. Anthony believed that as the government they should “assert the province of government to be to secure the people in the enjoyment of their unalienable rights.” Theoretically, most along with Anthony, would believe this guarantees men and women the same rights, but surprisingly, the discrimination that women went through during this time was highlighted. Anthony continues to quote the Constitution and how the government treats women differently while also fighting for what she knows is right. But originally Susan B. Anthony was there on …show more content…
Effectively, calling out the government for their injustice she compares herself to the men in the world. Repetitively Pankhurst states that if she “were a man” she would not have to go through the obstacles women do. This highlights her fight for justice, and how men are treated differently than men. She compares her time as a British suffragist to men who are in battle. Pankhurst goes on by saying, “I am here as a soldier who has temporarily left the field of battle in order to explain…”. Comparing herself to a man in battle emphasizes how she will continue to fight for women. Emmeline Pankhurst’s speech hits the topics and emotions needed and that were effective enough to cause