ipl-logo

From The Perspective Of C. S. Lewis And Reinhold Niebuhr

2312 Words10 Pages

Jessica Brazeau
Professor. Kraynak
Reason Faith & Politics
4.26.23

The Issue of Good and Evil from the Perspective of C.S. Lewis and Reinhold Niebuhr

The issue of good and evil has long been a topic of debate amongst the great thinkers of the world. Thinkers like C.S Lewis and Reinhold Niebuhr seem to represent two ends on the spectrum of opinions on good and evil. Lewis is considered a Christian Idealist because he believes we, as humans, are naturally endowed with goodness. Lewis places an emphasis on the intention behind actions and believes that even the most evil actions are done with a misguided intention of doing good. To support this argument, he points to human rationalization and the need to explain evil actions as a sign of good …show more content…

S. Lewis believes humans are inherently good and points to our natural sense of right and wrong and good intentions as a sign of this goodness. According to C. S. Lewis, humans have a natural moral law that helps us differentiate between what is right and wrong. For example, if you saw a man drowning, would you help him? C.S Lewis says that “You probably want to be safe much more than you want to help the man who is drowning: but the Moral Law tells you to help him all the same” (Lewis 10). The moral law is different from our natural instincts of self-preservation. It encourages us to make good and altruistic decisions for the betterment of those around us. When we consider whether something is right or wrong, we are comparing it to a standard of morality that is innate in us. Debating whether to save the man in the example of our natural morality tells us that the right thing to do is to jump in and save him. However, our sense of morality and goodness can also be misguided at times. Throughout history, various conflicts have occurred in the name of some righteous good. Lewis asserts that “We have no experience of anyone liking badness just because it is bad” (Lewis 43). No human enacts injustice with the sole aim of causing harm or offense to another. The evil inflicted by humanity is done with good intentions, albeit misguided at times. Evil actions often are rationalized by the perpetrator to show that they had good intentions. To Lewis, the good intentions of individuals are a sign of our innate

Show More
Related
295 Words | 2 Pages

Overall, in the book, Mere Christianity by C.S. Lewis, there are some very strong and applicable points that I believe, should be shared as much as possible. For instance, in the entire book one, Lewis rambles on about the moral law of society, and the outcome of peoples over complicated ways of thinking. He mentions the so called standard of behavior, which it upheld by the thinker to believe that whatever way he sees the situation should be the right way, and however the situation is presented in his mind is how it should be played out. Lewis gives many diverse examples of this action such as, sharing a “bit of orange,” since I “gave you some of mine.”  the greed involved with the way of thinking is what Lewis called the law of nature.

Read More
580 Words | 3 Pages

Lewis does an excellent job showing in his book, the battle that is sin against a believer in Christ Jesus. The ups and downs are always going to be surrounded by spiritual warfare for Christians. This has already been seen when analyzing The Law of Undulation. Lewis made a great masterpiece, in show casing spiritual warfare but without making it sound like there is any sac-religious material. When writing, taking a spin on a theological topic can be risky at times.

Read More
562 Words | 3 Pages

Book three of Mere Christianity, by C.S. Lewis, commences by discussing moral rules, which are directions for the good human life. Moral ideals may be preferences but are not moral obedience or aiming for high morals. Morality is concerned about three things; first, fair play and harmony between individuals; second, cleaning up and improving or harmonizing the things inside each individual and third, the general purpose of human life, what we are made for, what the inventor/creator wants. Modern people think in the first way and lose the other two. Lewis next discusses cardinal or pivotal virtues which include Prudence, Temperance, Justice and Fortitude.

Read More
1186 Words | 5 Pages

Sometime people tend to go with the wrong flow and end up away from God. Lastly and most importantly, people tend to now be exceedingly worldly. People are more open to wrong, sinful behaviors and accepting them in their lives. Which is especially the opposite of what God wants. In the end, Lewis’s style of writing does better equip one to better recognize Satan’s subtle deceptions through peer pressure, by joining the wrong crowds, going with the wrong flow, and becoming too influenced by the world and letting its sinful actions become

Read More
681 Words | 3 Pages

Levi Holliday, Mr. Pudewa Institute for Excellence in Writing, 29 May 2024. C. S. Lewis: A Writer’s Odyssey from Atheism to Christianity The early years of C. S. Lewis laid the foundation for his future accomplishments as a writer. Significantly, Clive Staples Lewis’s family highly valued reading and education, which immensely impacted him later in life.

Read More
888 Words | 4 Pages

“I have been asked to tell you what Christians believe, and I am going to begin by telling you one thing that Christians do not believe” (Lewis 35). This quote from C.S. Lewis opens The Rival Conceptions of God, the first chapter of the second book of Mere Christianity. Why would Lewis, a former Atheist, be discussing what Christians believe? Why would Lewis begin his chapter this way? Lewis also gives an answer to the all-important question – if God is good, why has the world gone wrong?

Read More
1530 Words | 7 Pages

Mere Christianity by C.S. Lewis, can be connected to many of the Catholic Intellectual Tradition core claims and questions. That being said, the core question “What is our relationship with the Natural World?” is actually heavily based off of this book. In book one, Lewis gives the readers a description of all the natural laws we can be faced with in this world. The Law of Human Nature, on page 4 and 5 he says “this law or rule is about right and wrong… it is called the Law of Nature because people thought that everyone knew it by nature and does not need to be taught it.”

Read More
1060 Words | 5 Pages

Power is one of the most sought-after things in the world. Everyone is on a different level of power where some have little of it and others have a lot of it but no matter how much power they have they always crave more. The novel To Kill a Mockingbird is based in a small town called Maycomb, Alabama where a young white woman called Mayella Ewell lives with her father Bob Ewell. The Ewells are thought of as the lowest class because Bob Ewell spends all his checks on liquor and does not support Mayella and her other 7 siblings.

Read More
196 Words | 1 Pages

In every day life, we face many situations that require a moral decision. We have to decide what is right and what is wrong? Not always is this an easy task thus, it seems important to analyze how we make our moral decisions. I will start with an analysis of how we make decisions in general

Read More
1657 Words | 7 Pages

An Unfortunate Position In the first chapter of his book Mere Christianity, C.S. Lewis makes two points: “Firstly, that human beings, all over the earth, have this curious idea that they ought to behave a certain way, and cannot get rid of it. Secondly, that they do not in fact behave that way” (Lewis 8). Before Lewis makes this statement, he defines the certain way humans should behave as the Law of Nature, which is the Law of Right and Wrong. So Lewis is stating that all humans know they should do good instead of evil, but they still break the law telling them to do good.

Read More
540 Words | 3 Pages

”(Lewis 137). The quote states that there are good and evil but a truly evil person is more dangerous than one who has been broken by evil, because they are truly lost to reason beyond their own selfish desires.

Read More
1495 Words | 6 Pages

Those who commit wicked acts because they can not see what is truly good have a skewed point of view for a reason.  Their character is tainted by vice because they have habitually committed vicious acts in the past.  Since they originally had a conscience, they must have willingly committed wrongdoing to warp their perception of what is good.   Therefore, those who pursue an apparent good but commit wrong acts, due to a skewed appearance of what is good, are still responsible for their

Read More
623 Words | 3 Pages

In making the argument for the existence of the Law of Human Nature, C.S. Lewis first establishes the acknowledgement of a few different universal laws that man in subjected to. There is the law of gravity, in which Lewis insinuates that in the eyes of gravity, the body of man and a mere stone are one and the same. Then there are biological laws that correspond with those than an animal has. However, the one law that is specific to man and that man is free to disobey or get “mistaken”, is the “Law of Nature or decent behavior” (Lewis). C.S. Lewis uses inductive reasoning to form this kind of logic by first making the observation that even though throughout time man has seemed to have had different agreements of what they believe to be moral,

Read More
760 Words | 4 Pages

For an extreme example, a terrorist thinks he is doing the right thing by setting off a bomb. Many situations in life can put into action inherent good, and many people will channel this good. Inherent good can be difficult to explain, but many examples can explain it in great detail. Nobody is born with the intention of being a bad person. Sometimes people believe that the evil people in the world have always been bad, but that is incorrect.

Read More
812 Words | 4 Pages

This question has been asked for hundreds of years, are humans born inherently good or bad? Some might argue that as people mature, society’s influences ultimately determine whether or not that person will end up being good or bad. These people suggest that humans are naturally born of good intent. Many studies show that this may be true. In another case it can be argued that some people are born with a natural instinct to do bad things.

Read More

More about From The Perspective Of C. S. Lewis And Reinhold Niebuhr

Related Topics

Open Document