ipl-logo

Gay Marriage Charles Colson Analysis

685 Words3 Pages

In his essay titled Gay “Marriage”: Societal Suicide, Charles Colson discusses fervently his opposition of same-sex marriage. The essay’s main point is constructed around Colson’s belief that if same-sex marriage were to be legalized, it would decouple marriage and procreation and thus destroy the “traditional building block of human society.” He states that same-sex marriage would lead to “an explosive increase in family collapse, out-of-wedlock births - and crime.” Colson presents us with a diverse set of evidence including statistics, studies, and his firsthand experience as a prison minister. Colson’s primary aim is to persuade his audience that allowing same-sex marriage will be traumatic for society. He does this by first establishing …show more content…

His argument at this point is based on the teaching of three specific religions. Not only is Colson referring to religion, which is already an area that is entirely open for interpretation, but he is also arguing that a legal change should not be made on the grounds that these three religions state otherwise. In a democratic country where church and state have been separated, this argument becomes invalid. The teachings of the church hold no power in the government. Although this choice of persuasive technique may have helped Colson to convince his Muslim, Jewish, and Christian readers, it has overall done more harm than good in developing his argument. Overall, Charles Colson’s essay Gay “Marriage”: Societal Suicide causes the reader to give more thought to the controversial topic that is same-sex marriage. Despite the fact that the essay is ridden with fallacies, Colson’s utilization of statistics, studies, and his personal experiences as a prison minister, all partially contribute to his overall goal; the essay causes the reader to stop and think about their opinion on same-sex marriage as well as consider Colson’s

Show More
Related
762 Words | 4 Pages

Susie O'Brien's article 'It's time to honour gay couples and allow them to marry' (The Advertiser, November 20, 2010, p. 27) is arguing the side of pro-gay marriage in the debate of marriage equality. This argument is made using ethos, logos, pathos and suggestive language as to guide you to her side of the argument. Susie begins by talking about herself and her experience on the subject of whether or not she had a choice when growing up straight or gay. She demonstrates her knowledge on the topic by referencing her personal history; however not truly showing why her opinion should be listening to rather than others. Her argument is very personally based and draws examples such as herself and her family or friends.

Read More
711 Words | 3 Pages

In the article, “An Appeal to Maryland Voters, for my Mom”, the author Chrysovalantis P. Kefalas, shows how his argument on why the ruling of the Defense of Marriage Act to be unconstitutional, is justified. Kefalas defends this action this action to show that despite religious views, authorities and laws should not hinder others from happiness and living a life that they desire. His argument take words directly from a widely used source to show that there is reason on both the sides of the law, and religion. He appeals to the Audience’s emotions by describing personal afflictions with himself and the beliefs he once had, and how his situation has affected his life as well as his family. His use of Ethos, Pathos and Logos give his argument a natural balance that can be seen from both sides, making it strong and effective.

Read More
1764 Words | 8 Pages

My Amendment begins as a simple letter from a reader named Ken Byron to a writer of a Pennsylvania newspaper discussing his agreement with the writer about their disdain for Same-Sex Marriage and his desire that it be banned in the Constitution. Byron’s argument quickly goes from an expression of his own opinion to an absurd idea of banning Samish-Sex Marriage between an effeminate man and masculine woman. Byron has such strong beliefs that Samish-Sex Marriage should not take place that he has created a scale defining what constitutes a Samish-Sex Marriage and what he believes can be done to ensure no one is entering into Samish-Sex Marriages. George Saunders’ story My Amendment offers a critique of a repugnant social practice through the use

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

Starting out with this phrase has a strong impact on the reader immediately. In our society, gay marriage opposers are notorious for citing “religious freedom” in order to not serve the LGBT community, and by and large we have accepted this. By bringing a somewhat obscure religion- Hinduism- into the discussion, Von Drehle is able to give the reader a better picture of what Davis is actually doing- and by forcing the reader to recognize that for anything else, citing religious freedom would not be an excuse to not perform one’s duties as an elected official in a community. By starting out with a question to the reader rather than an opinion he wishes the

Read More
949 Words | 4 Pages

Annie Nguyen Mr. Montalbano AP Language and Composition, Period 4 21 February 2016 What’s Wrong with Gay Marriage? Questions Meaning Questions: 1. What three arguments against same-sex marriage does Pollitt summarize in her first three paragraphs, and how does she refute each argument?

Read More
734 Words | 3 Pages

Colson then states the consequences of gay marriage being implemented and gives reference to the statistics. Later on, it is found that Colson is a Christian who believes that at the end of the day " there is one natural moral order of the family". Colson begins the essay the essay by explaining how gay marriage was "forced on us" by judicial fiat. Colson believes that the Federal Marriage Amendment, was severely broken between heterosexual marriage when the states implemented gay marriage legal across the entire United States.

Read More
704 Words | 3 Pages

An article in the Slate magazine, “A Conservative Case for Marriage”, concern debate between the author and the public in Alabama. The Author William Saletan, discuss about the existence of Homosexual couples in public because all this time the existence of homosexuality couples looked bad by public. The author says that homosexuality isn’t a sin because it occurs since they born. The author also says Homosexuality isn’t harmful because it’s not like paedophilia or sexual abuse. The author says if the sterile Couples can be accepted in public, why the homosexual couples not.

Read More
259 Words | 2 Pages

When debating the legalization of same sex marriage, religious reasoning and accusations of bigotry often provoke obstinance. Instead of reiterating those arguments, William J. Bennett, a prominent cultural conservative, former secretary of education, and author of The Book of Virtues, focuses on societal effects in his op-ed article, “Against Gay Marriage.” Though Bennett’s piece conveys partiality, it also attempts to discuss this issue scrupulously to ensure readers will consider his argument and perhaps accept his implications. While some of Bennett’s word choices convey tolerance of the gay community, his rhetoric incites readers to accept that preserving society requires marginalizing homosexuals.

Read More
1377 Words | 6 Pages

In spite of the fact that a privilege to marry is not listed in the Constitution, the Court said that such a privilege is covered under the Fourteenth Amendment in light of the fact that such choices are vital to our survival and our values. Accordingly, they should essentially reside with the individual instead of with the state. This choice is a conflict with the popular argument that something cannot be an actual constitutional right unless it is spelled out straightforwardly in the U.S. Constitution. It additionally stands out amongst the most imperative models on the general thought of common uniformity, clarifying that essential social equality is basic to our reality and cannot really be restricted on the grounds that a few people trust that their god can 't help

Read More
1236 Words | 5 Pages

The question of if and how this general pattern extends to same-sex families was then examined. Results proved that children in cohabiting households have poorer health outcomes than those in married households (Reczek, C., Spiker, R., Liu, H., & Crosnoe, R. 2016). Historically, we know married couples in the United States have more socioeconomic resources than cohabiting couples. After comparing different and same sex families, it was shown that some of the same sex families had limited access to valuable socioeconomic resources. This is mainly due to disenfranchisement, fear of homophobic treatment within the community, and discrimination specifically in the workplace (Reczek, C., Spiker, R., Liu, H., & Crosnoe, R. 2016).

Read More
629 Words | 3 Pages

Colson states “The family, led by a married mother and father, is the best available structure for both child rearing and cultural health” (Colson, page 578). Says who? How is a non-heterosexual couple any less capable of raising a child? Not to mention, all the single parents out there due to either divorce or became widowed. A stable and loving environment is what a child needs, not for people to place a label on his or her parents.

Read More
878 Words | 4 Pages

In the essay, “Why Shouldn’t Tommy and Jim Have Sex?” by John Corvino, he protects and fights for the right of homosexuals to engage in sexual activity. Also, he criticizes the arguments that are against homosexual sex and marriage. Corvino takes his time addressing each argument and provides evidence to back up his statements. Corvino’s opening statement is about Tommy and Jim being a homosexual couple.

Read More
1612 Words | 7 Pages

Joey Cho Mrs. Middleton English 10 17 October 2016 Persuasive Research Essay Outline Introduction LGBT/ same-sex marriage is one of the most heated and controversial debates in our current society. Unlike the past thousands of years whereas marriage was defined as a legal union between a man and a woman, now the concept of marriage has been extended to a broader context. “Homosexuality” in most cultures is viewed as a disgrace, and it is often considered as a great sin from a religious aspect.

Read More
760 Words | 4 Pages

In this article David Cameron state that he thinks we should be promoting marriage, rather than looking at any other way of weakening it. And Pope Francis state gay marriage is not a simple political flight and is attempting to destroy God’s plan. This two shown the arguments for gay marriage is based on the religion and political. [3] The article uses the data of ILGA-Europe, Belgium.be, INE, CBS, SCB to conclude the number of gay marriage and civil rights in the Europe. [4] Their focused on the argument of the gay marriage, there are against gay marriage side and for the gay marriage side.

Read More
823 Words | 4 Pages

Before we begin our proposition to support the legalization of the right for conservative bakers to refuse to sell wedding cakes to homosexual couples, it would be appropriate to set a context as to where this argument is coming from and being applied in terms of environment and social structure. As such, our argument lies in the realm of a country or a collective environment where the legalization of homosexual marriage is implemented, where the union, as well as marriage between two people of the same sex, is a civil constitutional part of the social structure of the time and place. Hence, they are a group of people recognized as equals among others regardless of their race, language or religion; and like any other, they have equal human

Read More

More about Gay Marriage Charles Colson Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document