ipl-logo

Gay Marriage Oxymoron Lisa Schiffren

812 Words4 Pages

I believe in Gay Marriage. I feel that every human being has a right to make his or her own decisions, and that involves their choice in marrying whomever they want to marry. In the article, “Gay Marriage, an Oxymoron” Lisa Schiffren shows how she argues that same gender couples should not marry. Lisa Schiffren states that marriage should be between Man and Woman. I disagree because in the Declaration of Independence it said, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” What this means is that human beings are free to choose what makes them happy. Every human being has the right …show more content…

I disagree with what she states because, Marriage is not only for procreation, otherwise infertile couples or couples not wishing to have children would be prevented from marrying. From 1970 through 2012 roughly 30% of all households were married couples without children, and in 2012 married couples without outnumbered married couples with children by 9%. 6% of married women age 15-44 are infertile, according to the U.S Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Also in a 2010 Research center survey, people rated love, commitment, and companionship higher than having children as “very important reasons to get married.” Only 44% of unmarried voted for love, commitment, and companionship. 59% of married people rated having children as a very important reason to get married. This is showing that unmarried couples believe the important reason to marry someone is by having love, commitment, and companionship in their relationship, and not necessarily by having …show more content…

The U.S Supreme Court ruled a case in 1974 called the Cleveland Board of Education, which was, “Freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life is one of the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause.” Judge Vaughn Walker wrote in California banning Gay marriage was, “Unconstitutional under both the Due Process and the Equal Protection Clauses” (Vaughn Walker). The Due Process Clause in both the 15th and 14th Amendments of the U.S constitution states that no person shall be, “deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of the law.” The Equal Protection Clause in the 14th Amendment states that no state shall “Deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Marriage is an internationally recognized human right for all people. Since 1888 the U.S Supreme Court has declared 14 times that marriage is a fundamental right for all. In the article 16 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights guarantees, “Men and Women of full age without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion has the right to marry and to found a family” (United Nations). People are entitled to equal rights as to marriage whom ever they

Show More
Related
603 Words | 3 Pages

Firstly, marriage and abortion are compromised by the ninth amendment. In the Roe v. Wade case in 1971, the Supreme Court failed to tell a Texas resident, who sought to abort her baby, that they had no jurisdiction over the matter and that she was protected under the government. However, Texas laws prohibited the termination of her pregnancy and therefore

Read More
1192 Words | 5 Pages

David Boonin’s response to Jeff Jordan made great points. Boonin mentions that “marriage involves a public recognition of a personal relationship between two people and people who are married become eligible for various sorts of public benefits that are unavailable to unmarried couples” and that to take this away from homosexual couples makes it into a “public dilemma” (Boonin 247). I strongly agree with this claim, as it is basic to understand that regardless of your gender, race, or sexual orientation, you are entitled as a human to certain rights. It is a discrimination to try and retract this right from anyone because of their sexual orientation. Just as it would be to try and prevent marriages of different races or religious backgrounds.

Read More
2137 Words | 9 Pages

Hodges (2015) the Supreme Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees the right to marry as one of the fundamental liberties it protects, applying to same-sex couples the same as opposite-sex couples. This case was brought forward by numerous groups of same-sex couples who were suing their relevant state agencies to challenge the constitutionality of those states’ same-sex marriage laws. The Supreme Court found that there is no difference between same-sex marriages and opposite-sex marriages, therefore, the exclusion of same-sex couples from the right to marry violates the Due Process Clause. This is policy making because the Supreme Court forced states to change their laws by deciding that it was against the constitution to not only ban the recognition of same-sex marriages that occurred in states that allowed it, but also making same-sex marriage legal in all states. Government officials even those who do not believe in the law change must abide by it, by allowing same-sex couples their now legal right to be married and receive the benefits that opposite-sex married couples receive; changing the way that citizens and the government interact in societal ways but also financial

Read More
936 Words | 4 Pages

The essay written by Katha Pollitt, titled, “What’s wrong with gay marriage” is an intriguing one. At first, the author, explains the notion that marriage and procreation do not necessarily go hand-in- hand. And later, she carefully interprets the true meaning of marriage; by stating there is a separation of church and state. Most importantly, the author speaks to her audience in a clear and logical manner; without adding personal biases. Although the essay may seem to have deterministic view on social behavior.

Read More
1377 Words | 6 Pages

In spite of the fact that a privilege to marry is not listed in the Constitution, the Court said that such a privilege is covered under the Fourteenth Amendment in light of the fact that such choices are vital to our survival and our values. Accordingly, they should essentially reside with the individual instead of with the state. This choice is a conflict with the popular argument that something cannot be an actual constitutional right unless it is spelled out straightforwardly in the U.S. Constitution. It additionally stands out amongst the most imperative models on the general thought of common uniformity, clarifying that essential social equality is basic to our reality and cannot really be restricted on the grounds that a few people trust that their god can 't help

Read More
505 Words | 3 Pages

Those who are support same-sex marriage often argue that love is grounds enough for marriage, Regardless of sexual orientation(2 https://www.aclu.org/).Those who are against same sex marriage often tell their religious aspect, and viewpoints and concerns about the raising of children as the main reason for their opposition. The debate of same-sex marriage involves many legislative,cultural,religious,and family issues(3). Christian groups that argue for same-sex marriage believe that lesbian,and gay people were created by god and should have the same rights as heterosexual couples. Christian groups that argue against homosexuality often say that it is immoral, against gods will,and against human sexual goals which is to have kids. The Islamic faith openly rejects homosexuality telling the story of lot in Sodom as a condemnation of

Read More
1827 Words | 8 Pages

Sullivan argues that homosexuals have the same capability to maintain a commitment as compared to heterosexuals, therefore they should be able to apply for marriage. Some argue that a domestic partnership fits the demand for homosexuals, but Sullivan rebuts by explaining that anyone can get a domestic partnership without being sexually attracted to each other. This does not resemble the idea of marriage for gays and lesbians. With gay marriage, the value of marriage will still be immense, Sullivan assures. To children, Sullivan addresses, homosexual parents are preferred rather than single or no parents.

Read More
1027 Words | 5 Pages

The debate around same-sex marriage was is a good idea to legalize it. I believe that same-sex marriage should be legal. I don’t think there is anything wrong with people of the same sex getting married. Now the concept of traditional marriage has changed and the power of love is more important than gender in my opinion.

Read More
759 Words | 4 Pages

Nothing should dictate what a human being’s heart desires. If a citizen in the United States enjoys the freedoms the United States ensures, then they should be able to pick their desires in marriage without boundaries. If a person wishes to abide by what is considered orthodox in their culture, be it heterosexual marriage or polygamy, then that is purely their choice and should not be influenced by others. Moreover for homosexual marriage. And individual’s choice to marry a person of the same sex is their own, and it should not be bound by guidelines others consider to be

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

Amendment to the Constitution Just like the choice people on making about relationships, childbearing, contraception, and procreation, they are protected by the American constitution. Issues of marriage provide a chance for people to make their individual decisions. There is a contentious issue in the constitution of the US in regards to marriage. Marriages between people of the same sex should be amended to only permit marriage between men and women. God ordained marriage, and in the era of human rights, this institution should not be polarized by allowing marriage to exist between people of the same sex.

Read More
1339 Words | 6 Pages

The Supreme Court held that the Due Process Clause of the fourteenth amendment guarantees the right to marry as one of the fundamental liberties it protects, no matter if it involves two people of the same sex or a man and a woman. The right to marry is a fundamental liberty inherent to autonomy. There is no union more profound than marriage, for it supports the most intimate association between two people. This principle was fundamental in Griswold v. Connecticut, which held “the constitution protects the right of married couples to use contraception.” Next, the right to marry secures children and families through legal recognition to building a home and raising children.

Read More
1122 Words | 5 Pages

For example, mothers continue having children out of wedlock to increase the amount of money and benefits they received from welfare programs. Marriage is one of the two most important factors contributing to personal happiness. Marriage is also a very strong factor in promoting the upward mobility of children (Rector, 2006). Marriage is the greatest protector against child poverty. Children born to a married mother and father are about 80 percent less likely to be poor compared to children in single-parent homes.

Read More
833 Words | 4 Pages

For years gay marriage has been an issue particularly in the United States. So many countries allow same sex couples to get married but not all states in the United States agree with allowing same sex couples to be married legally. The Supreme Court has gone back and forth on this issue plenty of times and it has come down to moral and religious views and simply what people think is right or wrong. Marriage is defined as a union between two individuals. Whether the two individuals are male and female, two males, or two females everyone has a right to be married.

Read More
786 Words | 4 Pages

One of the other key arguments articulated as part of this debate has been the rights of children. Some people believe that children growing up in a same sex family / household are somehow disadvantaged by not having a 'mum and dad'. I believe that marriage equality is a basic human right in our society. The rights and freedoms of all people should be what's sacrosanct, not the 'traditional' construct of marriage. I want to live in a healthy, harmonious and open society where people are respected for who they are, not based on their gender, identity and cultural background.

Read More
1612 Words | 7 Pages

My second reason for supporting LGBT/ same-sex marriage is the reason for discrimination against marriage. The UDHR article number 7 illustrates that all people are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination. Furthermore, article 1 of the UDHR also indicates that all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. We should act towards one another in a spirit of a brother. By denying the same right as anybody else just because you are different is a clear form of discrimination, and it goes against the constitution.

Read More

More about Gay Marriage Oxymoron Lisa Schiffren

Related Topics

Open Document