The Presentation of Gender in the Wife of Bath as a Response to Medieval Misogyny
While the exploration of gender and power through literature was not new to Chaucer, the Canterbury Tales seemed to serve as a vessel for the cumulation of his unfinished ideas and storylines concerning women and the role that men play in their lives. The theme of gender and power is discernible throughout a suitable amount of the Canterbury Tales. Arguably, the story in which this theme is presented in the most impactful way is the Wife of Bath’s Tale. Chaucer exhibits a rebuttal of medieval misogyny through the Wife of Bath’s Tale, championing the Wife of Bath as an icon of female independence. This is presented through the language used to describe the Wife
…show more content…
The Wife of Bath is displayed as strong, independent, and unconcerned with any social standards she may or may not be held to. When explaining the Wife of Bath Chaucer details,“Bold was her face, and handsome; florid too. She had been respectable all her life, And five times married, that’s to say in church, Not counting other loves she’d had in youth”(Chaucer 14). Multiple clothing items add onto her attitude of self-determination and power, as she is described as wearing a hat that resembled a shield, and sharp spurs on her feet (Chaucer 15). With the Wife of Bath being described as a mistress with multiple husbands, one would expect her to be characterized as a scheming harlot that men should be wary of (as was common in medieval misogynist tales). On the contrary, she was seen in a positive light along with her traits of independence. The introduction of a well-received, bold female character among the company of predominantly men foreshadows the tale that she will eventually …show more content…
For example, the story begins with a rape. Another difference, women hold the most agency throughout the story. The queen is given the fate of King Arthur’s knight, the “old hag” saves the knight by her own accord, and in the end holds mastery over her husband. This differs from what I would expect to see in a 14th century romance tale about a knight. While the King does turn the knight over to the queen (showing that there is still a power imbalance between men and women), the knight is judged by the queen and a court filled with noble ladies, maidens, and widows. He is given another chance at life by the queen, and his life is secured from the knowledge he received from the woman sitting on the green. Without the women in the story, he would be dead. “Had not the queen and many another lady importuned the king so long for mercy that in the end he granted him his life and gave him to the queen to dispose of” (172). During the first class discussion of the Canterbury Tales, there seemed to be some unsureness about whether the story was about female independence. Some believed that because the old hag turned into a beautiful woman at the end, consequently rewarding the rapist, that there was an ulterior motive. Personally, I find the conclusion to be evidence of the feminine bias present in the