ipl-logo

General George Armstrong Custer: The Greatest Failure In History

728 Words3 Pages

Thomas Langley 30 January 2016 History 1302 Panola College Professor Bill Offer The Forgotten Custer Our life is defined by our accomplishments and failures. Sometimes the only thing that is remembered about a person seems to be the failures. We often hear of great Generals from Robert E. Lee to George Patton and many others that have stood out in the course of history. There is one man nonetheless that seems to hold the title of “Greatest Failure in History”. This is the case with General George Armstrong Custer. George A. Custer was born on December 5, 1839 and was raised in a large family. Like most children, Custer exuberated a lot of energy that often led to mischievous behavior. This conduct led to poor grades during his youth. At …show more content…

He was to take important plans to General McDowell who was in charge of the Battle of Bull Run. This was to be his first time on a battlefield where he and several others such as Colonel William Tecumseh Sherman, Brigadier General Thomas Jackson, and Colonel Kirby Smith would learn first-hand about war. After the Battle of Bull Run, Custer was then appointed to General Phil Kearny. He attempted to learn as much as he could from this seasoned officer. Throughout the Civil War, Custer was a valuable asset to the Union Army. Custer’s cavalry unit was instrumental in the victory at Appomattox and in appreciation General Phillip Sheridan bought the desk where the surrender of Robert E. Lee was signed and gave it to Custer. General Sheridan, prior to giving Custer the desk, wrote a letter to Custer’s wife complimenting her husband for his role in the victory. "Permit me to say, Madam," he wrote, "that there is scarcely an individual in our service who has contributed more to bring about this desirable result than your gallant …show more content…

In 1867, he led a failed attempt against the Southern Cheyenne Indians that resulted in his court martial and suspension for a year for not being present during the movement. General Phillip Sheridan, though, came to Custer’s defense and he was eventually reinstated. Custer once again made the army proud with his attack on Black Kettle’s band in 1868 at the Washita river. George was then sent to the Black Hills and participated in several battles with the Lakota Indians between 1873 and 1876. Upon discovering the valuable resource of gold in the Black Hills, the government appointed Custer, along with Generals John Gibbon and George Crook, to remove the Lakota Indians. The plan seemed to be a simple one that required the three units to converge on the Lakota Indians and deal them a definite defeat. Custer and his Seventh Calvary arrived ahead of Gibbon’s unit and little did he know that Crook’s unit was turned back by Crazy Horse and his warriors. Upon Custer’s first initial evaluation, he believed that it was just a small Indian village. Custer split his unit into three divisions and carried out the attack. He was met with thousands of Lakota, Cheyenne, and Arapaho warriors that dealt a devastating defeat to George A. Custer and his Seventh Cavalry. Custer and all his men had

Show More
Related
569 Words | 3 Pages

Lieutenant Colonel George A. Custer executed poor mission command during the Battle of Little Bighorn by failing to create a shared understanding of the operational environment and exercise disciplined initiative. Custer was the commander of a battalion in the Battle of Little Bighorn during the Indian Wars1. Little Bighorn was the location of a nomadic village of Lakota Sioux, Northern Cheyenne, and Arapaho tribes2. Custer approached the unified Indian village with his force of nearly 650 men from the east and south to act as a hammer. Following Custer’s advance, additional infantry and cavalry approached from the north to act as a blocking force or anvil in support of Custer's movements2.

Read More
1814 Words | 8 Pages

Scribbles on Scrap: A Mission Command Analysis of the Battle of the Little Bighorn The massacre at the Little Bighorn in 1876 was one of the most recognizable battles in American history. The defeat of the 7th Cavalry Regiment and the slaughter of 268 Soldiers by the Sioux serves as an enduring subject of study for contemporary military professionals. The basic modus operandi for command principles in the times of the Indian Wars loosely mirrors the mission command philosophy of today; however, if we still lay credence to the efficacy of the mission command philosophy, how was it that a conventional force under the direction of a battle proven leader was defeated by an irregular enemy? In the end, Lieutenant Colonel George A. Custer’s complacent

Read More
534 Words | 3 Pages

George B. McClellan was very impressive at training soldiers I would say but when battle came around he wasn't so successful, he was looked up to by a great

Read More
54 Words | 1 Pages

George Armstrong Custer is noted for being at the bottom of his West Point cadet class, but his standing was not due to lacking intelligence. Instead, Custer seemed to be more interested in entertainment and playing pranks on his classmates. Although he was very popular, some of his classmates and instructors did not

Read More
189 Words | 1 Pages

His education was hunting skills and learning how to survive. He was a very powerful man. He stood up to the U.S government. He earned Chief in his tribe. Sitting Bull held numerous war parties.

Read More
677 Words | 3 Pages

Many historians debate that it was Custer’s fault that the US Army was defeated. There are many reasons that could be attributed to Custer. He acted alone - even though Gibbon 's last words to him were: "Custer, don 't be greedy. Wait for us. " which shows he was greedy and wanted the glory all for himself. Instead of going round the Wolf Mountains, Custer force-marched his men strait through the mountains.

Read More
1268 Words | 6 Pages

However, Chief Sitting Bull had attracted many more tribes from throughout the region, based on his leadership and resistance to adhering to the terms imposed by the Treaty of Fort Laramie. During the annual Sun Dance ceremony, which took place in southeast Montana the numbers swelled, up to 8,000 people and 1,800 warriors. Two weeks later the camp had moved south and settled on the banks of the Little Bighorn river which was fertile hunting ground. It was now mid-June of 1876 and the column moving east from the Dakota territory was also in the southeast of the Montana territory. At this time, Major General Terry had decided to detach the 7th Cavalry under Lt. Col George Custer from the formation.

Read More
541 Words | 3 Pages

A leader’s breaking point in battle is often when he surrenders. In this moving speech, Black Hawk reaches his breaking point. In 1832, Black Hawk had no choice but to surrender, and in his speech he detailed the history of lies and betrayals. Black Hawk uses his last strength of power to inspire his people to keep on fighting. In his speech, Black Hawk evokes emotion to unite the Indians and a shift in point of view to imply that now it’s their time to fight the battle.

Read More
591 Words | 3 Pages

General Meade, Union, had a “loss of one-quarter of his men” (Eyewitnesstohistory.com). Although there were was a

Read More
1148 Words | 5 Pages

Robert E. Lee’s (1807-1870) contribution to the United States as a war general and commander received positive connotations for his commitment, attitude and inspiration on the battlefield. However, it is debateable about his contributions because of Robert Lee’s association in the Civil War (1861-1865) to the Confederate Army that fought for the Southern States. Robert Lee lead many successful campaigns and battles including the following; helping defeat Mexican armies that lead to U.S land gains and westward expansion, battles against a more powerful army in the Civil War. Despite these achievements Lee’s loyalty for the Confederate Army that fought to uphold slavery undermines his success and is highly debateable about whether his contribution is justified or not. Robert Lee’s contributions to his nation begin before the Civil War in the Mexican-American War (1846-1848).

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

Sitting Bull would go on to lead from the sidelines a successful conquering of General Custer at the Battle of Little Bighorn; at this point he was past fighting years, but sent two nephews into battle in his stead, White Bull and One Bull. An estimated 80 Lakota and Cheyenne were killed in this conflict, along with a total obliteration of all five companies of General Custer. Because Sitting Bull led this great victory from the sidelines, many rumors spread about him with common people, especially settlers. Some even

Read More
903 Words | 4 Pages

Title: The Sand Creek Massacre Research Question: What were the reasons behind the gold rush in Colorado in the 19th century and the war atrocities committed by United States Government towards the culmination of the Sand Creek Massacre? Though Colorado was not yet a state in the 1950s, the gold prospects within the territories which were still under Kansas at the time led to an influx of emigrants in a land that was originally occupied by Native Indians. The Colorado gold rush to this day is considered to have been the largest in the United States in the 19th century forming an intricate description of the country’s history in general. Following the discovery of gold in 1859 thousands of people descended towards the Rocky Mountains of Colorado,

Read More
738 Words | 3 Pages

While Cluster was walking along the little bighorn river the Terry/Gibbon column was marching toward the mouth of the little bighorn. Custer planned a surprise attack but he get spotted before he was able to do it. So he decided to attack without anymore waiting. His scouts warned him that the village is very big but he didn 't hear on them. And so he ran into his crushing defeat.

Read More
2070 Words | 9 Pages

Major Reno and Captain Benteen just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, and they were so fatigued that they would not have been able to think straight anyways. I believe that Custer did what he had done at so many other battles, he gave an all-or-nothing at the Battle of Little Bighorn. He may have realized last minute, a little too late, that there were more Indians than he thought. He almost repeated what happened at the Battle of the Washita, but decided to stay with his battalion, which ended up getting him killed. There is clear evidence that everyone was just sleep deprived and it took them a while longer to comprehend what was happening around them.

Read More
266 Words | 2 Pages

Class, One reason for the defeat of the Plains Indians was the decline of the buffalo herds, due to the killing by white hunters. The buffalo was one of the most sacred things to the Native Americans, but was their main source of supplies, because they used every part of the buffalo to help them. Second are the former Indian lands being settled by homesteaders, because this reduced the ability of tribes to migrate freely through the plains. This also did not allow the Indians to hunt for more buffalo herds. Lastly was the hostile encounter with the US Army which provided a few victories for the Indian population although Sitting Bull and the Indians fought stunning battles such as the defeat of the US Calvary at Little Big Horn, in the end

Read More

More about General George Armstrong Custer: The Greatest Failure In History

Open Document