Generated Program To Believe: Understanding The Components Of Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy

A Computer-Generated Program to See to Believe: Understanding the Components of Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy Almost certainly, the former Infantry Officer for the Marine Corps Tommy Furlong’s Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy Experience has vividly painted a picture of how the mentally computer-generated technology of VRET works in such regards to Furlong’s wartime experience in Afghanistan in 2010. Of course, Furlong’s wartime experience is greatly different from other diagnosed-PTSD patients’ wartime experiences who have participated in VRET as a mechanism to minimize the relapses of PTSD without drug therapy. Moreover, as a proven treatment to combat-related PTSD experiences from diagnosed-PTSD patients, understanding the components

2). Secondly, regarding stimulation of the VRET, the mentally computer-generated based program stimulates the senses the visual, auditory, and olfactory systems (Seitz et. al., 2014, p. 16). Nonetheless, Seitz et. al. (2014) observes that the senses of visual, auditory, and olfactory systems triggers the visual stimuli of night and day vision images, soldiers, buildings, ammunition fired, the voices of humans, and radio communications (p. 16). Finally yet importantly, the stimulation of tactile and kinesthetic comes into play as the feeling of vibrations underneath the patients’ feet as a helicopter or a vehicle comes into the action of patients’ distinctive virtual environment (Seitz et. al., 2014, p.

According to psychologist and director of the Intensive Program for the clinical care organization known as Home Base Program, Peg Harvey states that a positive of Virtual Reality is that, “…Folks are able to get more details out more quickly with virtual reality” (Couch, 2015, para. 4). Aside from noting the advantages of the mentally computer-generated based program of VRET, the mentally computer-generated based program has its disadvantages as well. Especially, a significant disadvantage regards to diagnosed-PTSD patients not directly interacting with their therapist, since using VRET. Contrary to the popular to belief of VRET eliminates the traditional method of patients and therapist discussing face-to-face, VRET places an important and complex challenge for therapist. To demonstrate, VRET becomes a wrongly suited solution for patients to avoid directly engaging with their therapist to discuss their PTSD symptoms and experiences (Seitz et. al., 2014, p. 25). As a result, Seitz et. al. (2014) approves that therapist are allowed to limit the VRET (p. 25). To therefore, therapists spend more time interacting with patients face-to-face to improve patients’ PTSD symptoms (Seitz, 2015, p.