ipl-logo

Genetic Enhancement In Michael Sandel's The Case Against Perfection

1053 Words5 Pages

The ethical justification of genetic enhancements is a hot topic in the field of biomedical philosophy. Cases involving the utilization of genetic enhancement have been argued to suggest unease amongst individuals who perceive natural abilities as a “gift.” Genetic enhancement is the insertion of genetic material intended to modify human traits. The modification of human traits poses a depreciation in the value of giftedness. One author, Micahel Sandel, supports the value of giftedness in his essay, The Case Against Perfection. Although several cases argue the accessibility of applying genetic enhancement, such as muscle enhancement, molding children, and eugenics, Sandel’s essay analyzes some objections addressing the validity of these arguments …show more content…

One main theme of his essay is the nature versus molding of traits for genetic perfection. Sandel’s own objection in several arguments of genetic enhancement is the ethical responsibility to preserve the giftedness of humans. Sandel defines giftedness as a recognition of talents and powers that are unattainable through human intervention. Furthermore, perfection, according to Sandel, is achieved at the cost of an individual’s acquired experience of humility and responsibility. Concluding this essay, Sandel argues on the idea that "changing our nature to fit the world, rather than the other way around, is actually the deepest form of disempowerment (Sandel 7). Genetic enhancements are an abandonment of human giftedness and those who desire it are pursuing the disempowering concept of genetic …show more content…

As put best, Sandel mentioned in his essay that genetic enhancement erodes human agency by overriding effort, the real problem is the explosion, not the erosion, of responsibility (Sandel 9). This objection implies that true human agency in accomplishment is the result of intensive effort in perfecting an art, or sport. Mastering an art through effort requires the constant learning and improving of mistakes, which in turn, teaches humility and appreciation. Furthermore, some might object that the giftedness of an individual at an art, or sport, is due to their genetic lottery, good fortune of genetic traits. Rather than effort from practice, innate expertise is programmed into them from birth. Eugenics serve as a bridge to allow those without the genetic lottery to have the innate expertise and strive for greatness through effort. My objection to eugenics for giftedness is that it creates an arms race of giftedness. If eugenics are permissible, then a standard will be established—assuming eugenics is a standard. In order to surpass this standard, for example in sports, an even more higher quality of eugenics is required to set apart the mediocre from the superior, which may leave those who cannot afford eugenic treatment far inferior from those conditioned to be “top tier”. Eugenics for giftedness should not be permissible as it will lessen the human agency in

Show More
Related
646 Words | 3 Pages

Through bio-technology parents choose the genes of their children and attempt to replace the creators design. D’Souza quotes leading techno-utopian Lee Silver who states, “The human mind is much more than the genes that brought it into existence” (D’Souza, 2010, para. 17). In changing the child’s genetics, bio-technology changes the child’s entire future existence. The parents determine the traits the child will exhibit and their capabilities. However, the human mind is vast and expands beyond the limitations of the genes which brought it into being.

Read More
133 Words | 1 Pages

C. Ben Mitchell, a professor of Moral Philosopher at the Union University, in his article, “On Human Bioenhancements” (200), argues against the use of human enhancement which has emerge questioning about, the principles of justice, and cultural complicity. Mitchell supports his argument by describing how this method is an unethical behavior by the medical community and how this new technology should not be implement anywhere in the future. His purpose is to persuade his readers not to support this new method which will have a negative effect within our society, and instead of helping our future generation it will destroy our human nature. The author’s audience likely consists of professors, college professors, parents, with some understanding

Read More
782 Words | 4 Pages

(Hayes 500). As humans we can look at our past and even present and realize that genetic modification would only amplify global tensions and disputes. It wouldn’t be long until a nation’s leader begins to strive for the next “Aryan”

Read More
1008 Words | 5 Pages

As technology improves, so do human capabilities of altering nature, which in turn creates increased responsibility. This directly relates to genetic engineering, which is beginning to morph into a reality. There are advocates for both sides that convey their personal opinions about the hypothetical results, but neither is clearly superior since both arguments speculate upon an unknown future. Hungarian psychologist, Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, outlines this topic in his essay “The Future of Happiness,” which focuses on the history of selective breeding and compares the goal of happiness with genetic engineering. Csikszentmihalyi alternates between viewpoints regarding genetic engineering but presents a perspective dominated by warning.

Read More
1506 Words | 7 Pages

The Perfect “Scientific” Impulse Nathaniel Comfort portrays the evolution of genetic medicine from the 19th century to the present. Scientists, statisticians and other distinguished individuals contributed to the idea of eugenics and its relation to genetic medicine. Three central concepts that support the central idea of the story include: positive and negative eugenics, genetic medicine and the eugenic impulse. Comfort’s argument focuses on the idea that medical genetics and eugenics have one major aspect in common, THE EUGENIC IMPULSE. Society looks down upon eugenics; however, medical genetics is glorified and seen as a scientific accomplishment.

Read More
492 Words | 2 Pages

Julian Savulescu argues that genetic enhancement is not only morally permissible, but it is morally obligatory to genetically enhance one’s own child. Savulescu presents three points to defend his claim, but his vague language causes his argument to be unacceptable. Savulescu’s three arguments are as follows. His first argument is about parental duty to fulfill their child’s needs.

Read More
695 Words | 3 Pages

Academic readings, ‘A Pragmatic Optimism about Enhancement Technologies’ written by Nicholas Agar and ‘Newgenics’ by Edwin Black, together bring attention to the concerning issues around cloning and human enhancement. Investigative journalist Edwin Black’s reading focuses on the research surrounding ‘newgenics’ and how it will contribute to today’s society, while highlighting his negative uncertainty on how it will manifest. Black has a much more ethical and optimistic approach to this argument, he was showed to include detailed facts of already occurring case studies related to discrimination. Blacks execution is more simplified and strait forward. His work is also not carried out as severe or intense as Agars.

Read More
836 Words | 4 Pages

“After 4 billion years of evolution by the slow and clumsy method of natural selection, we have now evolved to the point where we can direct our own evolution” (Gattaca). Being able control genetic engineering seems like a crazy, unattainable vision. However, dystopian worlds reveal that the process of selecting desirable traits prior to birth could become a reality in the near future. Attempting to coexist in such a society would undoubtedly create many challenges. In both the film Gattaca and the novel Brave New World, genetic engineering divides society and limits the opportunities of the lower classes.

Read More
1631 Words | 7 Pages

Humanity has been presented with innumerable ethical dilemmas since the beginning of our existence but one that stands out in our modern day is the subject of genetic enhancement. With the rise of genetic technology and widespread use of tampering with embryos genetic enhancement at this point seems like it is going to happen. But using genetics to alter the human condition is something that is widely debated across the globe and people fervently support both sides of the argument; should we use our knowledge of genetics to enhance humans? There seems to be a line drawn where on one side, enhancement is being used to prevent children from having diseases and on the other side, enhancement being used to enhance the rest of human capabilities.

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

When people dream of their future child they always want them to be smart, athletic, and successful. In reality this isn’t true and never will be, or can it? Genetic engineering is the doorway to picking and choosing what traits a child has, but it may come at a cost that's more than just money. Brave New World by Aldous Huxley explores the idea of a futuristic city where children are being made identically in factories, then sent out and taught the same exact values as their peers. Along with Brave New World, an article from TheWeek called “Editing the Human Race” analyzes the new gene-editing technique called CRISPR.

Read More
526 Words | 3 Pages

Human enhancement and eugenics may have their difference but they are also similar. By definition, human enhancement is “any attempt to temporarily or permanently overcome the current limitations of the human body through natural or artificial means.” Eugenics on the other hand is “improving the qualities of the human species or a human population, especially by such means as discouraging reproduction by persons having genetic defects or presumed to have inheritable undesirable traits.” The obvious way these are similar is because they both focus on making the lives of individuals worth living. The way they are different is eugenics focuses on basically “weeding out the weak” which in this case would be the traits that people wouldn’t want to possess.

Read More
146 Words | 1 Pages

After reading chapter “Genetic Innervations and The Ethics of Enhancement of Human Beings”, the two theories that relate to the topic is The Consequentialism Theory and the Natural Law Theory. The Consequentialism Theory explains that certain actions are necessary because it does the best for everyone. In such case Genetic Enhancement will benefit everyone because it will help prevent disease and help other people advance in life. These actions won’t just contribute to the parents but the whole world as well by allowing certain disease be stopped. However, The Natural Law Theory also explains how actions are only right because they’re natural.

Read More
438 Words | 2 Pages

A small but substantial number of scientist and eugenicists have been requesting for more funding and support in this sector. Credit has been to these technologies by most people as a way to stop control of human evolution while on the other hand others see them as an efficient and quick way to produce enhanced children. However, there still exist some traditional eugenicists who focus on group dissimilarities in behavior, intelligence and alleged racism. But many eugenicists seek to distinguish their high-technological visions from earlier programs (McDonald). They claim not to be support of government coercion and racism that exemplified eugenicists of the twentieth

Read More
683 Words | 3 Pages

This world is a hostile one for the In-Valids. However, the engineered (Valids) people have the opportunities to do whatever they so desire. Although discrimination is illegal, people still discriminate and judge people according to their genetic makeup. Furthermore, characteristics such as personality, beliefs, values, and one’s moral code are considered irrelevant.

Read More
1370 Words | 6 Pages

Editing of the human genome in the past has been only a sight seen in dystopia works such as Brave New World. Now, genetic enhancement is a prevalent today and people are beginning to realize the issues that can arise from creating these designer babies. Gene editing can be helpful to eradicate life changing disabilities. Yet, the term disability does not correctly label these differently abled people, as the idea of what is considered disabled has changed overtime. To fully understand the consequences and implications of genetic selection and enhancement of human embryos, society must mature and declare lines of what is and is not ethically moral.

Read More

More about Genetic Enhancement In Michael Sandel's The Case Against Perfection

Related Topics

Open Document