ipl-logo

Genetic Testing Persuasive Essay

529 Words3 Pages

From a lawyer 's point of view I think that genetic testing should be done if someone wants or needs to do it. Genetic testing is the sequencing of human DNA in order to discover some genetic differences anomalies or mutations that may prove pathological. Everyone has the same right and we all have the ability to do what we want. Genetic testing has helped us get closer to discovering medicines for diseases such as cystic fibrosis. Cystic fibrosis is an inherited life-threatening disorder that damages the digestive system and the lungs, this diseases shortens life span as well.

There is also the fact that genetic testing is very expensive. If you do not have insurance that will cover the cost of genetic testing it will be very expensive. So I think there should be some type of help for those who can 't afford genetic testing, if not make genetic testing cheaper. Gene testing lets some use genetic test to change the gender of their baby. Gene testing should just be regulated as other medical testing. Keeping it safe and legal nothing would be wrong with genetic testing, which researchers try on animals and have also used animals to test for cystic fibrosis medicines.

Human gene engineering is when you alter a humans DNA. Many call it playing …show more content…

It also helps doctors determine medicines for certain individuals. As for risk genetic testing carries low risk after the second trimester in pregnancy after that it’s an ethical issue. In the scenario the parents find out they are carriers of cystic fibrosis, which some specialist recommended against couples having children. Like i stated there has been major advances from genetic testing that has lead to medicines and a planned cure in 25

Show More
Related
169 Words | 1 Pages

I agree. In some cases, knowing that you have a mutation and will be affected with the disease could be very emotional for an individual. One never knows how they will respond to the result and pretesting counseling may not fully prepare the individual for the result. One question that has been raised is should genetic counseling be allowed for diseases that are not treatable? It is thought that if an individual knows they will develop a condition that has no treatment it could cause psychological harm, stigmatization, and possible discrimination.

Read More
431 Words | 2 Pages

Through DNA testing we can now see which diseases we will likely pass down to our children. Although this ability can be life-saving in the aspect it can be used to prevent diseases in children, it also can affect the parents’ desires

Read More
857 Words | 4 Pages

In chapter seven of Genetic Turning Points by James Peterson, the topic of genetic counselors is discussed in terms of their role in the genetic testing process. In my ethical opinion, genetic counselors are a necessary component of the genetic testing process. Without them, ethical lines are more likely to be crossed as I believe more patients would undergo genetic testing without fully understanding what he/ she is giving their consent for and also receive unrequested results. Additionally, I believe that the absence of genetic counselors leads to patients being pressured into receiving tests he/she did not want or ask to take. , and receive unrequested results as well.

Read More
474 Words | 2 Pages

Genetic testing for a predisposition to a disease can be a simple process and can be beneficial to the prevention of life-threatening diseases. It has been done for a very long time with different strategies throughout its existence, including testing a small sample of DNA. It can also relate to literature like Brave New World. Genetic testing for a predisposition to a genetic disease is a way to find out the genetic information of a person including if they have a disease passed down genetically or not. Testing is done by looking at the family history and seeing if there is a disease that is passed down from generation to generation like diabetes and many forms of cancer.

Read More
1171 Words | 5 Pages

Prenatal genetic testing has been a source of controversy over the past few years, and is increasing as medical technology develops. The arguments supporting prenatal testing verses advocates that are pro life no matter what, is under great pressure to decide if prenatal tests are ethical. Bonnie Steinbock, a professor of Health Policy and Philosophy at the University of Albany, and Hank Greely, head of Stanford’s center for Law and Biosciences, both argue against prenatal genetic testing. They both believe that prenatal testing can promote abortion. Although they both share the same viewpoint on how individuals should not use prenatal testing, Greely writes a more persuading and convincing argument due to fewer fallacies.

Read More
795 Words | 4 Pages

Gattaca shows many times that genetic testing can be beneficial and has completely taken over society but at the same time provides many hardships like discrimination against certain ranks of

Read More
724 Words | 3 Pages

As technology advances, more things become possible. One of these things is genetically modifying a baby, this is very wrong. Genetic modifying or genetic engineering is altering someone or something’s DNA. Scientists hope to cure diseases with this method but doing this can lead to some harmful effects. This process is very unethical.

Read More
604 Words | 3 Pages

Now-a-days we even have some alternatives to animal testing, which is ethical and lead to more conclusive data. Animal experimentation gives us misleading data, is unnecessary and inhumane. Animals of all species are subjected to tests that leave them mutilated or even kill them. Some are injected with horrible chemicals then are left in their barren cages to suffer. Others are administered terrible deceases that slowly kill them.

Read More
545 Words | 3 Pages

Over one hundred million animals are tested on every year, that including mice, rats, frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, monkeys, guinea pigs, fish, and birds. These animals aren’t just tested on for all good reasons, they have discovered cures for both animals and humans from these test results! Although some believe animal testing is wrong, some individuals believe it should continue to be allowed due to it continuously saving millions of human and animal lives with medical advancements, also considering the fact that the animals aren’t actually treated that bad. Animal testing has been around from all the way back to 384 to 322 BC. For example, an arab physician in the twelfth century used an animal to conduct a surgery before having the surgery done unto a human to make sure it was safe.

Read More
702 Words | 3 Pages

It’s usually done in people that have history of suggests there’s a disease that may be inherited in their body. (6) Benefits of genetic testing and

Read More
1742 Words | 7 Pages

To Test or Not to Test Genetic testing has been around since the 1980s, and is a way to test a person’s genes using specific laboratory methods. Procedures tend to include drawing blood or simple cheek swab to gather samples of a person’s DNA. They can use these samples to test for hereditary patters inherited from both parents of the subject. Professionals can then use this to identify increased risk of health problems and identify and choose treatments for their patients. Commercial genome testing has been growing in popularity ever since it first began.

Read More
901 Words | 4 Pages

Should or should we not prohibit genetically engineered babies is the question to ask. After years and year of trying to figure out the cure for a disease like a mitochondrial disease, a group of professional on the topic believes that it would greatly benefit the baby ’s outcome exceptionally if their parents has harmful genetics. Most people concern would be how the baby would turn out because there have not been any clinical trials that prove that the genetics that is engineered properly work like they should. I personally believe that the genetics of baby should not be engineered, but I do believe that it should be up to the parent of the children since it is their child in the first place.

Read More
699 Words | 3 Pages

To start off, the cost of genetic testing alone costs a lot, let alone the cost of genetic counseling added to that. The cost of genetic testing depends on what type of test you get done, but the cost can range from $200 to even $10,000 and more. On average, genetic testing can cost $3376.02 (citation). This cost is already a lot and for those who test positive of having genetic disorders or possibly having genetic disorders will need genetic counseling to help them conquer the emotional impact resulting from the fear or distress of having a genetic disorder in play.

Read More
756 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing is not ok for so many reasons. The first I have to say is about the hardship and pain to the animals. Animals feel pain along with humans, so why do we test on them? What if a bunch of giant animals took you from your natural home, nearly starved you, then tested on you with weird equipment in someplace strange? Yeah, pretty awful.

Read More
1785 Words | 8 Pages

Some argue that it is against Christianity. Nonetheless, holy books does not have an explicitly written text about genetic screening. The arguments are only constructed from implications of the holy texts. As the holy texts might hold many different meanings, who can know for sure, if genetic screening is just or unjust way? As this topic is very complicated dilemma and needs a further debates to come to a common consensus, one should consider two outcomes: when it is morally accepted and when it is condemned as unethical thing to do.

Read More

More about Genetic Testing Persuasive Essay

Related Topics

Open Document