ipl-logo

Gideon Davis Set Up For Failure Essay

1078 Words5 Pages

The Army of Tennessee was set up for failure from the beginning because of Confederate President Jefferson Davis’s decisions, when it came to allocating generals and resources. With Davis’s primary focus on the Army of Virginia, the Army of Tennessee fell on the back burner and ultimately led to the overall defeat of the Confederacy and the end of the Civil War. His poor choice in generals to lead the Army of Tennessee led to ineffective communication, poor planning, and lack of supplies amongst the army throughout the entire war. Gideon Pillows lack of respect for Davis was shown as he commanded the Army of Tennessee originally, as well as his lack to follow orders and communicate effectively to the capital on his whereabouts and problems …show more content…

This was a struggle for the Army of Tennessee as they suffered with ways to get it. The main railway was cut off between the east and west confederacy leaving the Army of Tennessee in a bigger bind. Although, they may have not been as depended on it, “To add insult to injury the East Tennessee rail line drained off troops to guard its bridges, yards, and depots, but it rarely brought supplies or reinforcements to the Army of Tennessee.” Many letters were sent in desperation, but were ignored by President Davis. This only put another strain on the western army as well as the Anaconda plan. They were slowly forced out of western territories due to Union forces and were growing weaker as the war went …show more content…

Was it because of Lee, victories, or the capital? All these reasons would be true, but the main reason would be Lee. Lee lacked training from an institution, but showed a great skill in leadership when he fought in the United States army before the succession. Once the commander of the Army of Virginia, he showed effective communication with Davis and was able to secure many victories with his strategic planning. Lee knew how important it was to prevent the capital from falling during the Civil War, which is why he protected it with everything. If the capital fell, the moral of the people who supported the confederacy would fall. Just like it did with Sherman’s March to the Sea and Carolinas. Once the support was lost it will be even harder to continue. Many argue that if the Army of Tennessee had a commander as great as Lee that the Confederacy might of won. However, given the odds of the Union, the Confederacy would of still fell, but it would of taken longer. Another issue at hand was Davis, many of the commanders he appointed to command the Army of Tennessee were egotistical and felt that they were demoted or not receiving the recognition they deserved. Davis bond with Lee probably prevented him from finding another great

Show More
Related
260 Words | 2 Pages

These civil war battles were a major victory for General Ulysses Grant from the Union and a disaster for the Confederate forces in the South. General Grant seized Forts Henry and Donelson in Tennessee as a way to invade the South directly. Both forts were important for the South because of Tennessee and Cumberland rivers ways as supply line. Factors that played an important role in the Unions victory were Grant’s character traits and the weather. General Grant’s leadership and critical traits of initiative, aggressiveness, constantly seeking creativity, inventive, and resourcefulness were key to the Unions victory.

Read More
234 Words | 1 Pages

The Confederate army in Murfreesboro was commanded by Gen. Braxton Bragg. Bragg had just returned from invading Kentucky before he arrived in Murfreesboro. In Kentucky, he had commanded the Army of Mississippi, and then he was joined my Maj. Gen. Kirby Smith’s army. This new combined army of around 38,000 was renamed the Army of Tennessee. Just like the Union General Buell, Bragg was cautious about engaging the Union troops and decided passivity was wise.

Read More
500 Words | 2 Pages

The Civil War fascinates many people. It was the closest time the Unites States ever came to destruction. Many historians, geographers, economists, sociologists, and political scientist have analyzed why it happened and what conditions allowed for a union victory. However, what if the Union had lost? More specifically, what if the Union had lost the Battle of Vicksburg?

Read More
664 Words | 3 Pages

They felt secure that the Confederacy soldiers had the benefit of prepared troops. Those who were raised in the South had the opportunity to learn skills with guns and riding horses, which prepared them for battle. Whereas the Union troops were industrial workers whom had not been prepared. They assumed that since the Union were conquering land they had to leave soldiers behind at some point to protect the land conquest. In which the Confederacy believed it was reasonable to wait, until the North became vulnerable and surrender.

Read More
138 Words | 1 Pages

In the spring of 1864 Grant pursued Lee throughout Virginia, while the union General william T. sherman moved towards atlanta, with his army of 100,000 men, still excited about winning their past battles in southern tennessee. But they ran into a resistance of Joseph Johnston. He lead an army of less people, but they were more experienced than the Union Army. Johnston’s tactics were shaped by the military realities and politics. He realized that Lincoln’s re-election was doubtful.

Read More
60 Words | 1 Pages

•Jefferson Davis was a West Point graduate, and an experienced soldier, which meant he could command the Confederate army with more experience. • Davis’s strategy was to defend their territory, and hold on to as much land as possible. They planned to do this as long as possible, and hoped that the North would get tired of fighting and surrender.

Read More
1603 Words | 7 Pages

However, Lee then made a surprising move by launching an offensive defense that left a significant number of his troops to defend the heavily armed forces that entrenched into their land. At the end of the war Lee, troops emerged the victor because he was keen on each step that was made by Hooker. Irrespective of the number of men, Lee had Lee struck hard in any chance that Hooker hesitated (Scott Hartwig, 2014). The Confederate army also had the spirit of a must-win situation as compared to the Union Army that depended on their large number not considering the terrain of the land. McClellan's plans were not coordinated and were poorly executed.

Read More
637 Words | 3 Pages

“We heard that our forces were going to surrender Nashville without a fight, and we knew if they took that place we were gone too, but we heard that Davis had sent word for them to hold it at any hazards and he would send them as many troops as they wanted, so I am every day expecting to hear of your being at Nashville.” During times of war it is uncertain on which information to trust. It could be possible that the Union army will come but with the lack of presence they could of turned around. Communication would be rather hard during these times, with the armies on both sides cutting communication once they have captured a town. If they had a hard time to travel then the truth verses the rumors would have mixed and the integrity of the information was put on the line.

Read More
1456 Words | 6 Pages

He went through with Lee’s plans even though he disagreed and knew it was a death sentence for his troops, but he did it for his country and livelihood. Even though Longstreet’s strategies and plans had been brushed off by General Lee, his thoughts and concerns had been correct. The Confederate Army suffered mass casualties during the battle because they were invading without the advantage of high ground, which was what Longstreet had tried to warn Lee about. Although General Lee made Longstreet’s comments seem unintelligent, his thoughts were correct, and if Lee had taken his plans into consideration, their army may not have been so badly defeated. Although Longstreet did not influence the battle plans, he did give the Confederacy a better shot to win the battle but showing up when he did, however late he was.

Read More
464 Words | 2 Pages

The Mississippi River supplied the armed forces with troops, supplies, and equipment. Loss of Vicksburg would prove to be devastating to the South as they were now divided, lacked unity of command, and had lost their remaining control over the Mississippi making it difficult to maneuver troops and

Read More
1700 Words | 7 Pages

Individual state’s governors opposed him openly, as did a few of his generals including P.G.T Beauregard who “claimed” Davis held him back from attacking Washington D.C. (Crews, 2004). The Confederate Congress could not get along, and when Davis’ asked for a three year conscription law, the Congress was incredibly short-sighted and agreed to only one year of conscription for troops (Strode, 2015). This limited the amount of cohesion that the Confederate Army could create and experience that troops would receive. Jefferson’s own appointed vice president, Alexander Stephens, opposed everything Jefferson did and criticized him harshly (Crews, 2004). Two men who were supposed to work together in coordination ended up barely managing to withstand the others presence (Crews, 2004).

Read More
794 Words | 4 Pages

In fact Lee was one of the most highly thought of people when the Civil War broke out. Abraham Lincoln even went to Lee to present him with the idea of being the leader of the whole Union

Read More
1497 Words | 6 Pages

On July 1-3, 1863 in the town of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, Confederate and Union armies clash in what would be the deadliest battle of the Civil War. Maj. Gen. George Meade of the Union Army of the Potomac and Gen Robert E. Lee of the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia were significant leaders of the turning point of the War by a decisive victory by the Union. Costly missed opportunities and lack of intelligence lead to failure by the Confederate army. The Union Army relies on their impenetrable defenses to hold the assault especially Pickett’s Charge on the third day. Before Gettysburg, both armies of the Potomac and Northern Virginia recently fought at the Battle of Chancellorsville.

Read More
909 Words | 4 Pages

The rising numbers of death in the South tremendously weakened their army, which allowed for a Northern succession. William C. Davis asserts, “Industrially the South couldn’t keep up in output and in manpower. By the end of the war, the South had, more or less, plenty of weaponry still, but it just didn’t have enough men to use the guns”. Having such a small army, the South was not able to sustain a decent amount of soldiers for the war. Henceforth, the Northern advantage of having more soldiers had a large impact on the Southern loss in the Civil

Read More
489 Words | 2 Pages

The North had beaten the South in the Civil War. The North won the war for many reasons; they had some advantages over the South, a great leader, and the desire to win. The North and South fought many battles before the Civil War ended. Each battle had a different outcome and some encouraging the fight and some ended in despair.

Read More

More about Gideon Davis Set Up For Failure Essay

Related Topics

Open Document