Equality, like fairness, is an important value in most societies. Irrespective of ideology, culture, and religion, people care about inequality. Widening inequality also has significant implications for growth and macroeconomic stability, it can concentrate political and decision making power in the hands of a few, lead to a suboptimal use of human resources, cause investment-reducing political and economic instability, and raise crisis risk. The economic and social fallout from the global financial crisis and the resultant headwinds to global growth and employment have heightened the attention to rising income inequality. The impact of trade on the level and distribution of income has been a topic of considerable debate among academics and …show more content…
The remainder of this paper proceeds as follows. Section 2 reviews the existing literature on the impact of trade on income inequality. Section 3 introduces the data set and methodology, and provides the statistic results, both with a descriptive and empirical analysis. The concluding section summarizes the main findings and indicates possible policy …show more content…
In general, this refers to the income gap between the rich and the poor. Firstly, it is necessary to distinguish between what is called absolute poverty and relative poverty or income inequality. Absolute poverty is where people do not have sufficient access to food, shelter, and clothing to provide a basic level of physical and mental development. Absolute poverty levels can be compared across countries. Relative poverty is an income inequality measure whereby an arbitrary income level is set as the level below which people in the particular country are considered to be poor. When analyzing income inequality, there are two main categories which may seem similar but in reality have very different meanings. The first one is the income inequality within a country which is usually measured with the Gini Index. The second one is the income inequality between countries which is measured as the difference in National Income. This paper will mainly focus on intra-national income inequality. There is no doubt that between the richest and the poorest countries the gap in average incomes has been widening. However, within developing countries, research has not been able to find any systematic relationship between economic growth and changes in income inequality. In fact, income inequality within developing countries largely appears to be stable over time. In high-income countries, there appears to have been increasing inequality
UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS SESSION 2014–15 EC120 The World Economy in Historical Perspective Term Paper 2 By George Estephane: 1304052 Describe the steps taken in Western Europe during the two decades after 1945 to foster international trade. Assess the role of trade in Western Europe’s recovery from depression and war, making clear how relevant economic theories can be applied to support your assessment. This essay will focus on the measures Western Europe undertook in order to adopt and nurture international trade throughout the period 1945-1965.
The problem with the widened wealth gap is that the inequality may harm the quality. Meaning that those in the higher classes see it as you can use the money with no restrictions. However, economist believe that the “relationship between inequality and economic freedom, with the possibility that policies that are meant to reduce inequality will reduce economic freedom, which will then only make inequality worse.”
Nations engage in international trade because they benefit from doing so and the gains from trade arise because trade allows countries to specialise their production in a way that allocates all resources to their most productive use. Trade plays an important role in achieving this allocation because it frees each and every country’s residents from having to consume goods in the same time combination in which the domestic economy can produce them. China’s growing presence in Africa has increasingly become a topic for debate in the international system and among economists as well as policy analysts. China’s presence in Africa and its relations with African countries is primarily driven by economic interests and practical political considerations,
Population growth is also a main reason in why income inequality is occurring. In Iraq and Syria, the population increased from around 160 million to 300 million in total from 1990 to 2012. However, the population only increased from approximately 20 million to 45 million from 1990 to 2012. This is a serious issue because the oil countries don’t have income disparity as the country’s revenue is already satisfied by the oil countries so the income distribution in oil countries already exceeded 50% since 1990, however, most Middle East countries such as Syria and Iraq have low income distribution relative to the oil countries because they have high population with extremely low government revenue. There are more reasons why population growth
raises an important question of whether we should readdress what it means to be considered a developed nation. While economic growth has been the standard for many scholars measuring country’s development level, measuring the economic equality level will shed more light on what it truly means to be developed. Just because a nation has a large market does not mean that the citizens are enjoying the growth. There has to be a way to address issues on economic equality.
As the world economy changes, comparative advantage also fluctuates, and those workers who are left without jobs are increasingly more visible. Yet, according to Scheve and Slaughter, the workers who are most skilled (workers with a college degree or higher) are the ones who have been experiencing growth in their incomes, while those less skilled workers (those with at least a high school degree) are experiencing a decline in their earnings (4-5). In addition, corporate profits are those who have brought most of the money to these highly skilled workers (Scheve and Slaughter 5). What this argument is trying to say, is that the average citizen is suffering more income inequality as a result of free trade, and that is not accurate. Inequality has increased in some countries who have pursued globalization, but it is because of “domestic education, taxes, and social policies” (Dollar and Kraay 1).
The central argument in this paper dwells into the idea of inequality and poverty; it begins by defining the characteristics of inequality and poverty which raises a paradox in its context. In parallel, it will suggest three policies to measure inequality and poverty. Then it illustrates on how growth affects inequality and poverty in terms of income distribution and development. Finally it will be justified why inequality and poverty is in an increasing rate and in what ways we could reduce it. Economic inequality and poverty
2.3. Rethinking the International Trade Theory Supporters of laissez-faire consider that free trade without regulations is the best policy in all circumstances and that government interventions distort markets and reduce benefits in the whole economy. They follow the basic principles of the “invisible hand” proposed by Adam Smith in which economy is in better condition if individuals pursue their own interests. However, they sometimes failed to acknowledge Smith's recognition of the need of institutions that allow people to maximize their welfare (Lewer and Van den Berg 73). By institutions he meant such things as legal, economic, political, social, cultural and technological systems that foster income growth for the citizens (73).
It is not possible for a country to really develop and grow if it does not directly target the problem of inequality” The question of inequality has been raised especially concerning developing countries and the models that are currently used to attempt to effect development and growth. It is not really clear what correlation effect inequality has on subsequent economic growth. Different types of data used and varying econometric methods lead to a varying array of conclusions. In this essay, it will be shown that there is a strong correlation between rising inequalities and growth, in a positive relationship, inspired from data collection and analysis by (Forbes, September 2000).
The report also pointed out that in the past 14 years Latin America and Africa countries, alongside with India and China, experienced a significant rise-up in wealth inequality. Davies, Shorrocks, Sandstrom and Wolff(2007) estimated that adults who sought to be the top 1% of the wealthiest population required approximately 240 times more riches than to be the wealthiest half of the world population, and 2000 times richer than the bottom half percent. Davies, Shorrocks, Sandstrom and Wolff also stated that one third of the population that distributed the bottom three deciles of the global wealth are Indian while Chinese shared 30% of the population that are in forth to seventh deciles. Compared with these two emerging economies, North American and rich-Asian countries could hardly be seen in the bottom deciles of global wealth. However, developed countries were facing the same issues as developing countries, that is, most of the wealth in these countries can not be owned by the most underprivileged half of their population (Mohammed, 2015).
Another argued driver of income inequality in the studied area is income distribution from different sources (capital, property, investment…). Over the last 20 years, this distribution has grown to be less equal. For instance, although capital income represents only a modest share of households income, its increase in inequality in the majority of OECD countries during the last 20 year have substantially widened the inequality gap. This raise principally caused by change in the upper part of the distribution. While earnings have always been the major cause of inequality in each and every country of the area, since the mid-1990s, their contribution to income inequality remarkably fell.
In the real world perfect competition is very rare and the model is more theoretical than practical , because of the imperfections that exist in the market mechanism. There are five broad types of phenomenon that lead to inefficient market outcomes: monopoly power, externalities, income inequality, factor immobility and nature of market. Therefore this warrant for government intervention for the removal of those imperfections for the society welfare.
One such theory would be the Kuznets Hypothesis. Kuznets (1955) hypothesised that income inequality would usually worsen in the early stages of economic growth but after reaching a peak level, the income inequality would then decline at the later stages of economic growth. This theory is also commonly termed as the Kuznets inverted-U hypothesis, and is depicted in Figure 2. As a country is developing, the Gini coefficient will rise initially, reach a peak value, before falling as the country continues its development. The Kuznets Hypothesis is also consistent with the development process proposed by Lewis (1954), otherwise known as the Lewis two-sector model.
This examines the behavior of microeconomic in terms of the human capital distribution that affect the income inequality in which comprise not only the whole populace but also the normally working people. The educational attainment and educational inequality can be measured as the human capital distribution. In order to compute for the inequalities of income and education, the generalized entropy index or the theil index was used. To avoid measurement error on inequalities and reduce the potential problems on the omission variable bias, the analysis was conducted through different static and dynamic panel data. The result of regression model in this study have showed that there is a positive relationship between income inequality and income per capita.
Inequality is simply differences between things and someone. Inequality is everywhere in society. Inequality can take place in many forms. When people hear inequality they instantly direct it towards racism and sexuality when in fact there those types of inequality aren’t always what people associate inequality with. One of the most unrecognized types of inequality is economic inequality.