United States V. Gordon E. Thomas III (2006)
Student’s name
Institution
United States V. Gordon E. Thomas III (2006)
This was one of the most anticipated court cases in the history of the United States. The judicial system found its self in the spotlight for the manner in which the investigations were conducted. The case involved an individual (Gordon E. Thomas) versus the United States. Gordon E. Thomas was the defendant and the United State was the plaintiff.
Gordon E. Thomas faced sexual offense charges against children. The charges were based on materials possessed by the defendant that portrayed minors getting involved in sexually explicit behavior. The defendant had also requested images showing young children engaging in
…show more content…
This was taken to be additional confirmation depicting how dangerous the defendant was to minors
SSA James Clemente, who operated with the Behavioral Analysis Unit provided the testimony relied upon by the state. SSA James gave evidence and pointed to confirm that the suspect’s characteristics are a daring sex crook, driving more weight on his imminent level of dangerousness for committing the same crime.
This was the first time when the court was able to ascertain and acknowledge a complete range of faults in the manner in which the FBI profiler verification was carried out. This stretched from the misapplied research, absence of peer review, un-certified methodology, and logical misconceptions to the aura of FBI proficiency. This concern led to absence of expertise dependability on the part of the state. It was out of this failing that the state had a direct impact on the case. This aggravating conduct provides a superb outline for prospective courts, owing to the fact that the methodologies engaged by the FBI do not diverge considerably across circumstances. This exceedingly speculative testimony brings about concerns to the courts on the specifics that should be of concern in such