ipl-logo

Gospel Of Wealth In The Gilded Age

880 Words4 Pages

Jesse Morrow
Ms. Helvey
History Period 4
February 2nd, 2023 Although the Gilded age was primarily viewed as a progressive era for America, there were both gains and losses from this era. The robber barons were just one example of the negative side of the Gilded age. Andrew Carnegie was a Scottish-American steel industrialist and philanthropist who led the increasing expansion of the steel industry in America in the late 19th century and became one of the wealthiest Americans in history. Carnegie wrote The Gospel of Wealth in June of 1889 to advise others to follow his lead and lifestyle regarding wealth and riches. Herbert Spencer was an English philosopher, psychologist, biologist, anthropologist, and sociologist who was most known for …show more content…

In the Gospel of Wealth, Carnegie states, “The man who dies thus rich dies disgraced” (Gospel of Wealth). Carnegie argues that people who hoard their wealth and do not use their wealth to improve society through philanthropy and donations are not contributing to the survival and success of society. This quote directly connects with Spencer’s concept of wealth and survival of the fittest, “If any one foolishly chooses, for the sake of saving a little money, to employ an uneducated empiric [medicine maker] he must take the consequences, be they what they may. He has acted under the guidance of his own free will, and, if he suffers, he has no one to blame but himself …” (The Survival of the Fittest). This quote highlights Spencer’s opinion of wealth, which is that when someone employs a less educated that, they have no one to blame but themselves and should face the consequences. At the same time, those who were less fit were left behind. Wealth for both Spencer and Carnegie was seen as a measure of individual success for survival and a sign of superior abilities and qualities. These quotes show the similarity between the two sources because both sources repeatedly bring up the idea of the wealthy assisting and providing for the working class. Both of these quotes highlight the shared ideology that wealthier individuals should strive to improve society …show more content…

In contrast, The Survival of the Fittest, written by Herbert Spencer, was aimed toward a larger population. While both sources promote the idea of individualism, the difference in their purpose and ideas of individualism highlights the fundamentally different values and beliefs both sources represent. In the Gospel of Wealth, Carnegie says, “The millionaire will be but a trustee for the poor; entrusted for a season with a great part of the increased wealth of the community but administering it for the community far better than it could or would have done for itself” (The Gospel of Wealth). This excerpt shows that, for Carnegie, individualism means using one’s wealth and resources to serve the greater good and support those around us rather than simply pursuing oneself. While on the other hand, Spencer believes that the concept of survival of the fittest naturally occurs within society, “It favors the multiplication of those worst fitted for existence, and, by consequence, hinders the multiplication of those best fitted for existence—leaving, as it does, less room for them” (The Survival of the Fittest). From this excerpt alone, we can see that Spencer believes that strong and capable individuals will naturally rise to the top in a generally competitive society. In contrast, the weak and less capable will be left behind. The difference in purpose in The Gospel of

Show More
Related
594 Words | 3 Pages

These “ Captains of Industry “ donated to charity and helped the poor after they helped themselves. Stated by Andrew Carnegie in Wealth and Its Uses “ It will be a great mistake for the community to shoot the millionaires, for they are bees that make the most honey, and contribute most to the hive even after they have gorged themselves full. “ Carnegie is explaining that millionaires make the most honey ( money/wealth ) and contribute the most to the hive ( community ) after the millionaires are stable themselves. These businessmen also set an example on how to live and deal with wealth, also stated by Andrew Carnegie in The Gospel of Wealth “ This, then, is helf to be the duty of the man of wealth: First, to set an example of modest, unostentatious living, shunning display or extravagance “ and “ to produce the most beneficial results for the community - the man of wealth thus becoming the mere trustee and agent for his poorer brethren.” Carnegie is explaining that men of tremendous wealth need to set an example of living for the poor and produce for the whole

Read More
1093 Words | 5 Pages

The captains of industry believed that the poor people were inferior to the rich people. The rich were superior because they had “wisdom, experience, and the ability to administer”. The duty of a rich person was to help out a poor person which was what was said in the Gospel of Wealth. The Gospel of Wealth is about how the rich person's responsibility is philanthropy. Carnegie believes in charity work so he would donate to libraries, and universities and schools and etc.

Read More
505 Words | 3 Pages

At the end of the 19th Century, as the United States was experiencing rapid industrialization, a reconfiguration of the social order yielded opposing visions of social progress. Andrew Carnegie, wealthy businessman, and Jane Addams, founder of Chicago’s Hull House, put forward different methods to achieve such progress, where Addams focuses on creating social capital in a seemingly horizontal manner while Carnegie advocates for a top-down approach. While both of them seem to reap a sense of purpose from their attempts to improve the nation, their approaches vary depending on their vision of the composition of the population they want to uplift. First, Carnegie and Addams’ desire to improve society is partly self-serving. For Carnegie, improving society is the role of the wealthy man who, “animated by Christ’s spirit” (“Wealth”), can administer wealth for the community better than it could have for itself (“Wealth”).

Read More
462 Words | 2 Pages

Andrew Carnegie was the one who wrote the Gospel of Wealth and it was a positive idea for the people who are not wealthy. Carnegie says that the upper class has a responsibility to address the issues of the wealth inequality. In the Gospel of Wealth, Carnegie stated that the wealthy class can be a better state than the government or state. Carnegie also states that the wealthy should dispense wealth and it should be a way that does not promote drunkenness. Carnegie argues that there are two types of wealthy people.

Read More
939 Words | 4 Pages

Likewise, many wealthy people, including big business leaders, came to realize that it was their role in society was to give back. Due to all the negative responses, people such as Andrew Carnegie were huge philanthropists . They stated that because they were wealthy and were better inclined than most, they should be willing to help those at the bottom. Andrew Carnegie’s, Gospel of Wealth, explicitly stated how the wealthy have a moral obligation to give back (Outside Evidence). Other major responses to changes and the impact of big business were responses from the government.

Read More
388 Words | 2 Pages

“The man who dies thus rich dies disgraced.” This is a famous quote from Carnegie, expressing his attitude towards wealth. Back in Carnegie’s time, property was an issue to the majority of people and thus was considered important; however, when Galbraith wrote his essay, poverty became a minor social issue and received less political attention. Their different historical background and perspective result in different opinions on wealth and poverty. Galbraith would criticize Carnegie’s idea of the Law of Competition, ways to aid, and responsibility and ability of helping the poor.

Read More
572 Words | 3 Pages

As the document B provide us with a review of North America Review, June 1889 titled “Wealth” by Andrew Carnegie. In this document we can analyze the ways of how wealth is disposed the first is keep it for your descendants, being this a wrong way to educate your children giving wealth without having worked to achieved, the second way is the leaving it for public uses after your death, but he criticized this by “Why should a man wait until his dead before he becomes of much good in the world?”, and the last one is the one he praise of set an example of “modest, living and to produce the most beneficial result for the community” By this he explain and implement a new model of use of wealth in the world for the common good making donations and improving

Read More
640 Words | 3 Pages

Kayti Davenport Hanna, Josh HIST 1493 7 May 2023 Andrew Carnegie's influences made America rich The richest man in America was not always wealthy beyond belief. Andrew Carnegie was the wealthiest Scottish American in the late 19th century storming through the American steel industry. Andrew Carnegie's philosophy was that wealthy individuals like himself have a social responsibility to give to the greater good. Carnegie’s three modes affirmed the economic explosion in America by arguing that wealth can be left to the families of the decedents, be bequeathed for public purposes; or, finally, be administered during their lives by its possessors to continue the wealth of the public.

Read More
605 Words | 3 Pages

Underpinnings and Effectiveness of Carnegie’s “Gospel of Wealth” In Andrew Carnegie’s “Gospel of Wealth”, Carnegie proposed a system of which he thought was best to dispose of “surplus wealth” through progress of the nation. Carnegie wanted to create opportunities for people “lift themselves up” rather than directly give money to these people. This was because he considered that giving money to these people would be “improper spending”.

Read More
1696 Words | 7 Pages

Carnegie, Conwell, and Alger Advocates of Wealth for All During the late nineteenth century, a form of Social Darwinism emerged called the Gospel of Wealth also known as the Success Gospel. Social Darwinism is “Herbert Spencer’s adaptation of Charles Darwin’s concepts of natural selection and “survival of the fittest” as it applies to human society” (Nash p. 417). Social Darwinists believed that the social order was the product of the natural selection of the individuals that were best suited for the existing living conditions. These individuals were white, Anglo-Saxon, wealthy men.

Read More
695 Words | 3 Pages

2.The three of these platforms have a wide range of views on poverty and the best course of action to eliminate poverty for good or at least get people on their feet. For starters, The gospel of Wealth written by Andrew Carnegie takes the viewpoint of the Wealthiest men in America. In his writings, he makes sure to explain that the reason that people are homeless and on the street is because they lack a good work ethic. The wealthy men are, “skilled and intelligent,” and view that being in “Poverty is a kind of character flaw.” Though he clearly does not feel sorry for these people because he believes it is deserved, the main point of the gospel is that the Wealthy should give back to the people.

Read More
835 Words | 4 Pages

In this text, he makes a valid argument as to why the rich should administer their own wealth unto those with less fortune. He begins his argument by explaining how wealth has revolutionized the United States. Carnegie mentions how the Sioux chief's wigwam was similar in appearance when compared to the huts of those inferior to him, and then compares this to the differences in economic classes of the 1800s. Carnegie later states how the very definition of wealth has changed throughout the years, where the poorest farmer of the 1860s owns more luxuries than the landlord of just a few years prior. Carnegie includes these two facts because he wants to show how much society has progressed throughout the last few hundred years.

Read More
849 Words | 4 Pages

Some say that Andrew Carnegie was not the hero that he pretended to be. The immense fortune he had amassed was created not altogether honestly. The essay written by Carnegie himself titled The Gospel of Wealth argues that rich men are “‘trustees’ of their wealth” but have the responsibility to use money for the benefit of the public (Andrew Carnegie). This belief is evident in some of Carnegie’s more public acts; large donations towards schools were meant to show the tycoon in a more pleasant light.

Read More
590 Words | 3 Pages

The “A Gospel of Wealth” it states the options of a way of disposing wealth. Andrew Carnegie believed that rich people had the chance to help out the poor not by just handing out money but by giving free education, building free libraries and items that are beneficial to improve society in knowledge.(Carnegie 26) Also, poets were able to make certain people into heroes after they have died, no matter what deeds they have done. At the end of Brown’s article, it says, “Gods and heroes are made by poets and balladeers, folk tellers in rhyme or prose.” Brown believed that some heroes were not actual heroes.(Brown

Read More
337 Words | 2 Pages

Poet, Edwin Arlington Robinson, in his poem, “Richard Cory,” emphasizes that looks can be deceiving. Robinson purpose is to convey that even a person like Mr. Cory can fall from the weight of the world. He utilizes imagery, tone, and diction to effectively characterize Mr. Cory admirability toward his audience. Robinson captures the people admiration toward Mr. Cory through imagery.

Read More

More about Gospel Of Wealth In The Gilded Age

Related Topics

Open Document