Government Privacy Susan Maret Summary

1180 Words5 Pages

American’s rights over government protection Are Americans being blindingly controlled by our own government? Today, there is a controversy to whether or not government should be allowed to monitor phone calls, emails, and internet searches for the purpose of investigating terrorist organizations and plans. Although it’s important to remain protected, giving up our rights to our government isn’t an acceptable proposition. Due to our government’s suppressing amount of power and secrecy, it is eccentric for us citizens to allow the government to violate our fourth amendment by breaching our privacy. We have one right that protects us Americans from unreasonable searches and that is the fourth amendment of the United States. It …show more content…

How does the government expect our trust when we don’t have theirs? If the government wants our trust in regards with invading our privacy, they should inform us with the truth. Even though we know the government has kept plenty of secrets from us we seem to still believe their words. The government has lied to us and we still seem to trust them. In Government Secrecy by Susan Maret states that “Perhaps the most profound consequence of government secrecy is its encroachment on public trust of information, which in turn potentially undermines confidence in government.” (Maret 13) This quote is accurate because America deserves the truth! We should not be lied to or taken advantage of by our own government. We shouldn't be left blinded of what is really going on in our country. This quote informs us on the effects of government secrecy. It gives us a broad view of how devious our government can be towards their private situations. One of the main consequences that government faces as a result of their secrets is the distrust they receive from America today. Our government can asks us to participate in their desire to know more of us but refuses to inform us with the truth. Instead of giving up our rights to our government we should be protecting them. Therefore, it is absurd that there is even a debate on whether or not we should allow our government to monitor our personal