“The book was better than the movie.” For many book lovers when their favorite novel is adapted to the big screen, they are disappointed by the outcome. The movie is not able to captivate the audience as much as a novel might. This is generally true due to the fact that the book allows the reader to get in better touch with the characters and their adventures. In 1940, the bestselling novel The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck was adapted by Darryl Zanuck and John Ford who produced and directed the movie. The movie which mainly stuck to the plot line of the novel did differentiate a little. But even with the difference they both touched on the subject and topic of the hardships of the migration of the families to the West. In the novel Grapes of Wrath Steinbeck conveys a more powerful argument about the hardships of migration than the movie does. This is shown through the sequence of events, the development of characters, and the contrasting endings. One of the differences between the movie and the book is the order in which the events took place once the Joads reach California. The choice to change these events, changed the way in which the migration is shown. Steinbeck’s order of events reflects the hardships that the migrants had to face, while Zanuck’s order gives the audience hope. In the movie, the …show more content…
The movie is a good adaptations of the famous novel The Grapes of Wrath. Even though the movie does a great job of sticking to the plot line of the book and present the main ideas of the novel, it does not express the hardships of the migrants as well. The Joads struggle as they travel through unclear water in the novel is rearranged to reflect to hope of the Joad’s destiny.The description and connection of many of the characters are cut. And finally the memorable ending was altered to reflect hope and perseverance. The movie does not reflect the struggles of the migrants as well as the