ipl-logo

Groupthink In 12 Angry Men

1535 Words7 Pages

Group think According to Janis, who coined the term; groupthink “occurs when a group makes faulty decisions because group pressures lead to a deterioration of mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgment” (1972, p. 9) further group think often leads to a decrease in the mental efficacy perception of reality and moral judgement, as personages find themselves in a group system that seeks high cohesion and unanimity which delimits the motivation of the individual to realistically appraise alternate courses of action (Janis, 1972). A common trait of a collective experiencing this phenomenon, is an inclination to take irrational decision making in addition to members of the group being similar in background and further being insulated from external insight. Comparably the singularity of groupthink is present in the film 12 Angry Men, and appears anecdotally, early on the film, present in the expected unanimous vote of ‘guilty,’ that will send the defendant to the electric chair. Invulnerability Literature surrounding the concept of group think is greatly rooted in the writings of Janis. Janis postulated eight symptoms that point to the presence of groupthink and impaired decision making. The first symptom described is an illusion of invulnerability and involves member of the ‘in …show more content…

Symptoms of Groupthink (Janis, Group think ).” Former describes behaviour associate with the next indicator of group think, rationalization, which involves the in-group substantiating their line of reasoning. In the first act juror number three is the front runner of the men who voted guilty. Promptly after the first vote he gives what he feel is undeniable datum and reason for his vote he

Show More
Related

Groupthink By Naomi Karten, And The Crucible By Arthur Miller

761 Words | 4 Pages

In The Dangers of Groupthink, Naomi Karten provides the reader with a few of many examples on how they can avoid the dangerous phenomenon that is, Groupthink. Karten expresses her opinion by stating, “Diligently avoid a no-criticism culture and a no-criticism decision-making policy.” (The Danger of Groupthink, 2). Being able to avoid a nonconstructive environment is an extremely courageous step that can ultimately lead to one’s success. However, for one to achieve such a large task takes a tremendous effort, and requires one to place both their feelings and well being on the line.

Read More

Civility In Twelve Angry Men

1339 Words | 6 Pages

Finally, by the end of the play, many jurors stopped listening to the men who were not civil. Juror 3 is an example of a person who was ignored because he was inconsiderate towards the other jurors. In fact, Juror 3 repeatedly accused many jurors of lying, which is where he lost the other’s vote. Juror 8’s calm nature favored the jury's attention. People often try to solve issues with anger.

Read More

Groupthink: The Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster

396 Words | 2 Pages

In many cases, people will set aside their own personal credence or adopt the opinions of the rest of the group. Groupthink occurs when the pressures are high to conform within an organization interferes with the group 's’ analysis to reach a decision limiting independent thinking. There are eight symptoms of Groupthink that include the following, illusion of invulnerability, rationalization, brief in inherent morality, out-group stereotypes, self-censorship, illusion of unanimity, direct pressure on dissenters, and self-appointed mindguards . A historical example of Groupthink is the Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster.

Read More

Character Differences In 12 Angry Men

1133 Words | 5 Pages

The Film 12 Angry Men, written by Reginald Rose, is a film written about the American jury system. In the film, as in any part in life, emotions are a tricky thing; This is especially true for the 3rd, 7th, and 8th jurors. One of the main themes in the film questions that of the emotions of the jurors. That question is: Is it possible to keep personal prejudice and emotions out of a trial? Is this even a good or bad thing?

Read More

Examples Of Mob Mentality In To Kill A Mockingbird

1485 Words | 6 Pages

Can one understand how the blacks could still be treated unfairly? In today’s day and age society is fighting for a change to end racism. Harper Lee used real life examples when she wrote To Kill a Mockingbird. Throughout the book, Lee referenced Jim Crow, mob mentality, and issues of racism during the time the book was written.

Read More

Analysis Of The Lords Of Discipline By Pat Conroy

1417 Words | 6 Pages

Making Positive Decisions With The Group There was a study done by Alexander Merone, a researcher at Penn State, in relation to exactly how much mob mentality can impact decisions. He stated that, "it only takes 5% of what the scientists called ‘informed individuals’ to influence the direction of a crowd of around 200 people. The remaining 95% follow without even realizing it” (Hodan). Statistics likes these frequently cause people to view mob mentality, or the way people are influenced by their peers to make decisions, as having a negative connotation.

Read More

The Excerpt From 'The Twelve Angry Men'

334 Words | 2 Pages

In the excerpt from the play “The Twelve Angry Men” a peret scenario is given on how not to take decisions. There are twelve jurors who have to decide whether a boy from the slums to get punished or not. Jury Eight is making statements based on his feeling and the rest feel, he is biased. People usually have an obligation with other people for some small reason or big reasons. That is why people end up taking bad decisions.

Read More

Minority Influence In 12 Angry Men

1458 Words | 6 Pages

“The Twelve Angry Men,” are a small group. Several theories of group performance are shown in the movie “Twelve Angry Men,” but they are subject to interpretation and run a less evident. Social facilitation, group polarization and social loafing are evident within the

Read More

12 Angry Men Groupthink Analysis

842 Words | 4 Pages

It is a natural human instinct to want to be acknowledge by your peers, yet it is also important to be a critical thinker. Irving Janis in 1972 created the term groupthink. He believed groupthink occurs inside a group of similar people that want to keep from being different, resulting in incoherent decision-making. The 1957 film "12 Angry Men," uses groupthink, which influenced the verdict vote in the case of a teenager accused of murdering his father. The purpose of this essay is to examine groupthink and to represent Dr. Irving Janis’ symptoms of groupthink in the film.

Read More

Leadership In 12 Angry Men

630 Words | 3 Pages

Leadership and roles are depicted throughout the whole movie by many different jurors. The designated leader of the jury group was Juror #1. Juror #1 was when they first entered into the room but Juror #8 took the emergent role when he declined to agree with a guilty verdict. His rejection to agree in a guilty verdict was crucial since he voiced his uncertainty to the evidence at a early stage.

Read More

The Justice System In Twelve Angry Men

591 Words | 3 Pages

The justice system that relies on twelve individuals reaching a life-or-death decision has many complications and dangers. The play Twelve Angry Men, by Reiginald Rose, illustrates the dangers of a justice system that relies on twelve people reaching a life-or-death decision because people are biased, they think of a jury system as an inconvenience, and many people aren’t as intelligent as others. The first reason why Reiginald illustrates dangers is because people can be biased or they can stereotype the defendant. The Jurors in Twelve Angry Men relate to this because a few of them were biased and several of them stereotyped the defendant for being from the slums. The defendant in this play was a 19 year old kid from the slums.

Read More

Groupthink In The Vietnam War

1150 Words | 5 Pages

Psychologist Irving Janis explained some alarmingly bad decisions made by governments and businesses coined the term "groupthink”, which he called "fiascoes.” He was particularly drawn to situations where group pressure seemed to result in a fundamental failure to think. Therefore, Janis further analyzed that it is a quick and easy way to refer to a mode of thinking people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members ' striving for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action. According to Janis, groupthink is referred as the psychological drive for consensus at any cost that suppresses disagreement and prevents the appraisal of alternatives in cohesive decision-making groups.

Read More

Mob Mentality Analysis

1838 Words | 8 Pages

When people are part of a group, they do not feel as if they are an individual, making them more susceptible to making detrimental choices. They believe that they are not going to be held accountable, that the emotions and the reasoning they are applying to their current situation is normal, because the people they are around are acting in the same way they are. Additionally, Tamara Avent commented on the behaviors of mobs by saying, “Groups can generate a sense of emotional excitement, which can lead to the provocation of behaviors that a person would not typically engage in if alone” (qtd. In Donley n. pag.). Groups can cause behaviors that people would not usually do if they were not in the group they were in.

Read More

Social Psychology In The Movie Twelve Angry Men

721 Words | 3 Pages

This theory is practicable inside of the juror’s decisional processes of the “Twelve Angry Men.” Conformity is described from the beginnings of the film. When the jurors cast their initial vote, doubt is clear in many of the jurors whom vote guilty. This inhibition might be commented as weak belief shaked by the guilty majority’s influence. Additionally, though the movie is not provide any references about the timelines of decision this is a relevant factor presumably affecting the “Twelve Angry Men,” and should be considered as a potential element in creating social

Read More

Argument Against EUT

987 Words | 4 Pages

As well as both the theories as disregard the process of group decision making. The process of an individual decision making appose to a group is very different. There are many factors in effect e: g size, group composite and the overall personality. (Chernyshenko et al 2003). Another characteristic that these two show case is the linearity of the theories.

Read More

More about Groupthink In 12 Angry Men

Related Topics

Open Document