Young boy affected by the lost of a family member he loved dearly that turned his world upside down. In Young Minded Hustler by Tysha, Prince was affected by his father’s death after seeing a rookie shoot his dad and die in his arms as a child. He was 10 years old when he witnessed his dad got shot. Prince was the oldest of his identical twin brother and his sister and they grew up in Youngstown. Prince had to live up to his dad legacy by being the king of the streets just like his father was and had to have revenge on the officer that set his dad up and killed him.
Everyone wants to believe that they have the power to change the world, but how many of those people are willing enough to change themselves for the betterment of those around them in their communities? Too many times have men and women stood by and watched their neighbors fall to the vicious clutches of leaders with agendas, as much today as in 1692. The Salem Witch Trials can, in many ways, be compared to the Scottsboro Boys’ trials of the early 1930’s in that both scenarios relied on the false accusations and execution of innocents, simply by consequence of immoral and deceitful people. The Salem Witch trials was a period of hysteria fueled by tensions created by mistrust and resentment between neighbors, as well as recent events such
(“The Salem Witch Trials”) This quote amplifies how widespread fear can implode such terror and panic erupting in the overall false accusations upon numerous as to the fleeing of outrageous consequences. This everlasting event implores how
The people that disagree are the witch hunters trying to stop the others that do not share their beliefs. In this essay, I will talk about the similarities of the Salem witch trials, the 1950’s communist agent wipe out, and the early 2000’s MLB baseball steroids scandal. In the Salem witch, trials 19 people were hung because they were accused of being witches. In the puritan society, the belief was that the only way to fix the problem was to hang witches, get them to confess, and tell on all the others who are witches.
Intolerant societies, poor leadership, and conformity are three themes that run through A Brief History of the Salem Witch Trials by Jess Blumberg, Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut, and The Lottery by Shirley Jackson. The three works reflect the destructive impact of social norms when they are imposed without reason, ruthlessly enforced, or blindly accepted. This synthesis essay will explore these themes in greater detail, drawing on key quotes and incidents from each text to illustrate the dangers inherent in conformity and intolerant behavior. Intolerance is a dominant theme in A Brief History of the Salem Witch Trials by Jess Blumberg. Despite the lack of evidence against the accused individuals, the residents of Salem were quick to condemn
This explains that the results of the Salem witch trials and the trials themself resulted in a panic and affected all different kinds of people. Both eras demonstrate skepticism and a lack of trust, as well as the uncertainty regarding whether or not individuals were communists or
Much of what happens in Salem still resembles some things we see in society today. The word of one man can change people’s ideas and images of another without conclusive evidence. What people fear the most can sometimes bind us together, even if it is not
Can the similar type of instinctive prejudice and panic that seized a small Massachusetts settlement more than 300 years ago take over the thoughts in the prevailing society triggering “witch hunts”? The goal of these actions was to alienate particular members of our civilization, and arouse condemnation of those who may have diverse beliefs, attitudes and practices. Citizens of this community began to establish separate policies and condemnations of hostility for any person who does not go along with the existing social behaviors and trends. To get a better view on the matter, I would like to go review four separate eras in our history. The Salem Witch trials, the Holocaust, The Red Scare, and current Middle Eastern terrorist groups.
Individuals must stand in opposition to collective injustice. By the end of the summer in 1692, twenty three innocent citizens of Salem, Massachusetts had lost their lives to the tyranny of the Salem witch hunts. By the end of the year 1956, countless U.S. citizens were victims of a second witch hunt which destroyed careers, friends, and lives. This is why there should be opposition against collective injustice. In Arthur Miller’s The Crucible innocent people were getting accused and punished for witchcraft, when in fact they were not guilty.
Nineteen people were killed in the Salem witch trials; however, most were innocent. This was the effect of groupthink, groupthink is “the tendency of decision making to suppress opposing opinions in the interests of group harmony” (Hill,“Groupthink”) . Arthur Miller writes the play, The Crucible, when he realizes groupthink is happening in his modern day. The Crucible dramatizes the Salem Witch Trials, which were a series of prosecutions of people accused of witchcraft. In The Crucible, Arthur Miller depicts Giles Corey as someone who stands up against the group by defending what he loves, in order to show that people should fight for what they believe in.
The debate continues on which causes contributed to mass hysteria in Salem, Massachusetts. After reviewing different sides of the debate regarding leading factors to the Salem Witch Trials, the obvious and logic answer is that religion played a huge role. One must first acknowledge that the Salem society was largely influenced by the strict Puritan lifestyle. Also one must understand that the issue involves Salem people’s belief in the presence of the Devil. Then, one can understand that the town ministers conspired against the community with the witch scare.
What was once considered a tool for accountability is now a tool used to deflect and lay blame where none is warranted. In the same way that Emmanuel Cafferty was fired from his job based on a single snapshot of a moment in time, many of those accused during the Salem Witch Trials were accused on the basis of spectral evidence, meaning the accused came to the victim and harmed them in a dream or vision. There was no solid proof that either instance truly occurred the way it was said to have occurred. Mob mentality and cancel culture serve as a way to deflect time and energy away from tackling more widespread, systemic issues such as racism and sexism. While many thought at the time that canceling Emmanuel was a step in the right direction, canceling him and having him fired from his job for supposedly making a white power symbol did little to nothing to address the ever-present systemic racism in the US.
It is a natural human instinct to want to be acknowledge by your peers, yet it is also important to be a critical thinker. Irving Janis in 1972 created the term groupthink. He believed groupthink occurs inside a group of similar people that want to keep from being different, resulting in incoherent decision-making. The 1957 film "12 Angry Men," uses groupthink, which influenced the verdict vote in the case of a teenager accused of murdering his father. The purpose of this essay is to examine groupthink and to represent Dr. Irving Janis’ symptoms of groupthink in the film.
Group think According to Janis, who coined the term; groupthink “occurs when a group makes faulty decisions because group pressures lead to a deterioration of mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgment” (1972, p. 9) further group think often leads to a decrease in the mental efficacy perception of reality and moral judgement, as personages find themselves in a group system that seeks high cohesion and unanimity which delimits the motivation of the individual to realistically appraise alternate courses of action (Janis, 1972). A common trait of a collective experiencing this phenomenon, is an inclination to take irrational decision making in addition to members of the group being similar in background and further being insulated from external insight. Comparably the singularity of groupthink is present in the film 12 Angry Men, and appears anecdotally, early on the film, present in the expected unanimous vote of ‘guilty,’ that will send the defendant to the electric chair. Invulnerability Literature surrounding the concept of group think is greatly rooted in the writings of Janis.
Psychologist Irving Janis explained some alarmingly bad decisions made by governments and businesses coined the term "groupthink”, which he called "fiascoes.” He was particularly drawn to situations where group pressure seemed to result in a fundamental failure to think. Therefore, Janis further analyzed that it is a quick and easy way to refer to a mode of thinking people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members ' striving for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action. According to Janis, groupthink is referred as the psychological drive for consensus at any cost that suppresses disagreement and prevents the appraisal of alternatives in cohesive decision-making groups.
