ipl-logo

Growing Up In The Amazon Character Analysis

606 Words3 Pages

Have you ever heard of the two most heroic and strategic characters? Rainsford is stranded on an island and might be killed General Zaroff, but he then survives in the long run. Kane thinks that he will be killed by Frank Miller but somehow he over comes his fate. Kane and Rainsford may not make but the they both learn how to survive under pressure. These two characters are both the underdogs but become the hero in the end.

These characters may be heroic they are two completely different people. You don 't come to this church often Marshal (Foreman 313). This shows that Kane has the job of a Marshal in a small town in Arizona. "We should have some good hunting up in the Amazon. Great Sport Hunting" (Connell 1). In this story of The Most …show more content…

Later in the two stories these characters use their brain power to figure out how they are going to solve their situation. Kane slips out the stable and around it (Foreman 330). This use of smarts shows that even though Frank Miller and his gang were trying to run Kane out of the stable he used his head and let the horses run out the stable to cause a distraction so he can sneak away from Frank Miller. "He climbed out from hard saplings cut stakes and sharpened them to a fine point" (Connell 13). This act of strategy and patience showed that Rainsford had planned to kill Zaroff before he kills, and he took his time with creating a trap for General Zaroff to fall into. These two acts of brilliance shows that strategy and smarts can help you survive or even can help become successful at something.

Rainsford and Kane both believe they might not make it but come out as the hero of the story. Both people may have two jobs but they both become successful in the long run. Being hunted didn 't stop them so eventually they soon overcame being hunted and they also believed they can survive. Using your head many situations can lead to many things in life coming easier to you. Kane and Rainsford are completely two different characters and minds, but surviving under pressure makes them no different from each

Show More
Related

Rainsford In The Most Dangerous Game, By Richard Connell

508 Words | 3 Pages

In “The Most Dangerous Game” written by Richard Connell. Rainsford was a hunter that fell off a yacht in the Caribbean sea, and swam to an island named Ship-trap, Sanger Rainsford had to figure out how to outsmart Zaroff. The Author states three topics from the hunt starting by climbing up a tree, then seating a trap and hurting Zaroff, Lastly jumping off the cliff and swimming to General Zaroff’s home. Rainsford demonstrated how he is a quick thinker written several times throughout the story.

Read More

Sanger Rainsford's Alertness In 'The Most Dangerous Game'

777 Words | 4 Pages

This shows he is alert by how he realizes the hounds, Zaroff, and Ivan were all coming so he quickly set up a trap to try and kill them to escape. Also it shows that he can remember a trick he learned before and again apply it to his situation. And finally it shows that he is extremely alert by how he sets the trap up so quickly so he does not get captured by Zaroff. In conclusion all these examples show Rainsford is a survivor by how he shows alertness in dangerous situations and how he gets out of that

Read More

Control Of Emotions In The Most Dangerous Game By Richard Connell

370 Words | 2 Pages

Rainsford even remains cool and calm when the pack of vicious

Read More

Comparing The Most Dangerous Game 'And Sound Of Thunder'

506 Words | 3 Pages

The way they act in urgent situation, proves that they have different personalities and points of view. Rainsford gets on the island, escaping from the danger - swimming for his life, and when he gets there he is forced to hunt. He knows that either he will die or either his victim, there is no other choice, but he keeps his emotions and fears under control, "his face was set, and he forced the machinery of his mind to function". Conversely, Rainsford

Read More

Rainsford's Decisions In The Most Dangerous Game By Richard Connell

541 Words | 3 Pages

What kept him from giving up during the three days of him being hunted was his new value of life. This value made him want to never become what Zaroff was. Zaroff was a murderer because he enjoyed the challenge of hunting humans over animals, which were no longer a challenge to him. Once Rainsford realized what Zaroff was doing he became afraid of him and refused to hunt with him when he had offered. Then, Rainsford was being hunted like the big game he used to hunt.

Read More

Similarities Between The Odyssey And The Most Dangerous Game

734 Words | 3 Pages

This example shows that Rainsford had to use his wit and mind to survive and out play his foe. Towards the end of the story Rainsford escapes by jumping off a cliff into the ocean to get away from General Zaroff. Rainsford escapes the island in a very clever way: “He reached it. It was the shore of the sea ...

Read More

Most Dangerous Game Theme Essay

844 Words | 4 Pages

The adrenaline rush that accompanies a fast paced hunt may be exciting, but perhaps it is not so exciting to be the one on the wrong side of the gun. This is what happened to Rainsford during “The Most Dangerous Game” when he met General Zaroff. Through his judging nature, Rainsford drives the story's theme of walk a mile in somebody else's shoes. In “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, Sanger Rainsford is shown as Sneaky, Brave, and Intelligent.

Read More

Module 4 Quiz: Correct Factors

209 Words | 1 Pages

Module 4 quiz Luke Horan 1. correct factors (x-3)(x+2)(x+4). I found that (x-3) is a factor Then you use synthetic division x^3+3x^2-10x-24 by x-3 x^2+6x+8 factor the trinomial =(x-3)(x+2)(x+4) 2.

Read More

Essay On The Most Dangerous Game Conflict

621 Words | 3 Pages

For man against himself Rainsford is trying not to give up on himself and keep battling the general so he will not get killed. Throughout the story Rainsford has many challenging difficulties but can he survive and win the game? One of the main conflicts in “The Most Dangerous Game” is man against man. Man against man first takes place when General Zaroff is hunting Rainsford.

Read More

Most Dangerous Game Character Analysis

848 Words | 4 Pages

In Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game,” Sanger Rainsford is forced to test his survival skills while he is intensely hunted by an experienced war general named General Zaroff. In this story, Rainsford exhibits some very helpful characteristics like his resourcefulness, his strategic planning, and his ability to reason. As a result of Rainsford’s questioning the validity of General Zaroff’s hunting methods, he ended up playing in the game. Although I believe Rainsford is a very helpful, interesting, and dynamic character, at the end of the story, he must give up his own personal morals to win the game.

Read More

Psychological Strategies In The Most Dangerous Game

706 Words | 3 Pages

The reader learns that survival is a different world in order to succeed, you need to use instincts, knowledge, and resources. In the exposition, the main character Sanger Rainsford uses his knowledge and instincts to fight against General Zaroff. The first scene uses foreshadowing to show how Rainsford is going to be in life or death situations. In addition, when Zaroff thought it was right about killing humans, but Rainsford knew it was wrong to kill humans.

Read More

The Most Dangerous Game Theme Essay

653 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout the story the reader sees how Zaroff “plays” with Rainsford as he hunts him and not once does Zaroff think he will lose to Rainsford. This is a clear example of the theme to never underestimate your opponent skills or the underdog may overtake you. Connell illustrates this theme through foreshadowing, irony, and, man vs. man. To help us visualize, foreshadowing shows how Rainsford, being the underdog, will overtake Zaroff who underestimates Rainsford. Although Rainsford is not seen as being the weaker link, Rainsford showed he did not pity those below him: “‘Who cares how a jaguar feels all they understand is fear.’

Read More

Indirect Characterization In The Most Dangerous Game, By Richard Connell

457 Words | 2 Pages

Rainsford is the character that changes throughout the story while Zaroff remains the same. Some examples of indirect characterization in “The Most Dangerous Game” is when Rainsford makes a prophetic statement in the beginning of the story when he and Whitney discuss whether or not animals feel. For example,”Be realistic. The world is made up two classes--the hunters and the huntees.

Read More

Characterization In The Most Dangerous Game By Richard Connell

961 Words | 4 Pages

In “The most dangerous game” written by, Richard Connell, he uses many devices such as: characterization, plot structure and theme to contribute to the overall meaning of the story. Characterization is a big part of the overall meaning of the story which is that survival is of those who are smart, cunning, and can adapt to their environment. The protagonist Rainsford is at a constant battle with the antagonist General Zaroff. Throughout the entire short story they both have similar minds sets and then farther along the main character 's mind set develops into something more. The reader can almost sense a self centeredness, and that he believes that there are only two type of people in this world, “the hunters and the huntees”, and he believes that he is the hunter.

Read More

Comparing Rainsford And General Zaroff

510 Words | 3 Pages

Here in the story General Zaroff is injured by a trap that Rainsfords set. “But he was not quick enough, the dead tree crashed down and struck the general.(232) This quote shows Irony when in the start of the hunt General Zaroff thought that this was going to be an easy kill and he could continue on. Throughout the story Zaroff and Rainsford both exert arrogance.

Read More

More about Growing Up In The Amazon Character Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document