ipl-logo

Gun Laws Pros And Cons Essay

693 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Pros and cons of gun control in usa

The debate around gun laws in the United States has been a long-debated topic. From the Second Amendment to the effectiveness of gun laws in reducing gun violence, the pros and cons of more gun laws have been hotly contested. In this essay, I will discuss three topics related to the pros and cons of more gun laws: the effectiveness of gun laws in reducing gun violence, the impact of gun laws on Second Amendment Rights, and the impact of gun laws on gun ownership and accessibility.

Gun laws have long been a contentious issue in the United States, and their efficacy in reducing gun violence has been widely debated. A study sought to examine the effects of gun laws on gun violence. The study analyzed the relationship between state gun laws and …show more content…

In an article they take an in-depth look at this issue, focusing on the court cases that have determined the scope of the Second Amendment and the legal framework used to interpret its protections. They note that the Supreme Court has consistently interpreted the Second Amendment to protect an individual right to bear arms, yet there is still debate over the extent to which this right is protected. Blocher and Miller point out that the Supreme Court has declined to extend constitutional protection to “dangerous and unusual weapons” and has also recognized the right of state and local governments to regulate firearms. In addition, they argue that the Supreme Court has made clear that the Second Amendment does not protect a right to carry weapons in public. Finally, they note that the scope of Second Amendment rights is still evolving and that it is unclear how the courts will ultimately strike the balance between public safety and the protection of individual rights. Overall, Blocher and Miller’s analysis provides a comprehensive overview of how gun laws have impacted the interpretation of Second Amendment rights and how this interpretation may continue to

Show More
Related
805 Words | 4 Pages

Roger McGrath and Warren Burger provide different perspectives on the continuing debate over gun regulation in the United States. Although these authors establish opposing conclusions, both understand that gun related crimes are becoming increasingly common and therefore pose a threat to the domestic tranquility of the nation. Their controversy is centered around whether or not increased gun restrictions will lower criminal activity. McGrath, in his article “A God-Given Natural Right”, argues that increased gun control will only disarm law abiding citizens leaving them defenseless therefore providing incentives for criminals to break the law. However, Burger’s emphasis on the unrestricted distribution of firearms in his article “The Right to

Read More
455 Words | 2 Pages

The second amendment states that “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (1 GOVT 6., Sidlow/Henschen). Often because of the social and political demands for gun control, the second amendment seems to consistently conjure claims of personal violation of rights, whether in agreement or disagreement of gun

Read More
823 Words | 4 Pages

When the U. S. Supreme Court issued its seminal rulings in Heller (2008) and McDonald (2010), finding that the Second Amendment does in fact guarantee an individual right to keep and bear arms that must be recognized by the states, many Americans felt like the issue of the Second Amendment had finally been settled in America. Unfortunately, as we would quickly see in Chicago, Washington, D.C., and elsewhere -- it was only the latest chapter in what has become an endless battle for the natural right of self-defense. Take, for instance, the District of Columbia’s post-Heller “fix” to its unconstitutional gun laws -- forcing citizens to obtain a license to carry firearms outside their home, but failing to provide any mechanism by which to obtain a license. In other jurisdictions, including Illinois and Seattle, officials attempted to create de facto gun bans by increasing the cost of ownership through taxes and fees, regardless of the impact on minority citizens.

Read More
1284 Words | 6 Pages

For the past 232 years, Americans have had the right to defend themselves against crime, tyranny, and victimization through the rights given to us by our founding fathers. If these rights were restricted or even taken away from Americans, the crime rate would soar, and the safety of the people and families of America would be put in jeopardy. If these rights were restricted, the generations to come would be brought into an environment of violence and crime. (Purpose Statement) While many think that gun control can fix the rate of gun homicides and crimes and mass shootings, it will most likely have the opposite effect and will restrict our right to defend ourselves.

Read More
804 Words | 4 Pages

I. Introduction The Constitution's second amendment says, "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (Madison, 1971, para. 2). The second amendment was written as a part of the Bill of Rights and gave the citizens the right to bear arms and form militias to maintain a free state. However, since its adoption, the interpretation of the Second Amendment has been a topic of debate and controversy. Some people argue that the Second Amendment assures a person's right to own firearms for personal protection.

Read More
1673 Words | 7 Pages

‘’Guns are responsible for over thirty-three thousand deaths in the United States annually, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).. In 2014, the CDC reported that 11,008 of the 15,872 homicides committed in the United States that year involved a firearm. Of the 42,826 suicides reported that year, 21,386 involved a firearm. These statistics have inspired efforts at the federal and state levels to enact gun control legislation to reduce crime and violence’’(‘’Gun Control’’). According to the statistic guns are held for over 33,000 deaths in the United States.

Read More
2019 Words | 9 Pages

The purpose of the Second Amendment The way in which we conceive our laws regarding guns is based solely on one important document: The Bill of Rights. The focus of this paper shall be mainly on the second amendment and how it shapes gun laws. This document will become a very important issue of the argument for less gun-controlling laws and to prove how the government is straying away from the original amendment set forth by the founding fathers of the United States.

Read More
1549 Words | 7 Pages

The topic of gun control and firearm regulation has been subject to heated debate for a long while. Both sides have potent arguments, however the core of this issue ultimately boils down to the constitution itself. More specifically the second amendment. This argument quickly becomes quite complicated because gun control and firearm regulation concerns not only the right of citizens, but more importantly the safety of citizens. The second amendment helps to guarantee an imperative right belonging to all citizens.

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

The government can create gun control laws to attempt to decrease crime, but that does not stop a criminal from pursuing the crime. Crimes can vary from murder, assault, battery, theft, and many more. Focusing on murder, Mark Gius did a study between the years 1980-2009 and found that “assault weapon bans did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level" and "states with restrictions on the carrying of concealed weapons had higher gun-related murders" (265). Gun control laws do not deter a criminal from committing a crime. A murderer has a motive and gun control laws do not have an impact on the decision to take someone’s life.

Read More
1991 Words | 8 Pages

The Second Amendment says, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Gun rights has become the subject of intense political, social, and cultural battles for much of the last century. The pro-gun right side has asserted that the right to arms was absolute, and that any gun control laws infringed that right (Kopel, 2013). This right has been supported by the Supreme Court who has reinforced what has become the American consensus that the Second Amendment allows the right to keep and bear arms, especially for self-defense, and that it is a fundamental individual

Read More
1108 Words | 5 Pages

One of the most controversial issues our nation faces today is gun control laws. This controversy has been created due to the different interpretations of the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution which states the right of citizens to bear arms; “a well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (Cornell Law School). Anti-gun control laws believe that the amendment guarantees the right to bear any kind of firearms. On the other hand, we have does that believe that more controls laws should be implemented since the 2nd amendment was for the right of States to have an armed militia during wartime. Both sides have strong point, however, the safety of our children comes first, and a firearm means death in the wrong hands.

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

Since the begining of America, the Founding Fathers wrote the strong-standing Bill of Rights with amendments to protect the country that had just recently won their freedom, but one amendment has been the top theme of controversies for centuries. Gun laws offend the Bill of Rights in so many ways and they prove ineffective. Gun Laws are relevant due to thousands of deaths and self-protection. The argument goes on but without guns there is militia, one of the main intents of the Second Amendment. These simple rules can reduce deaths, proven by millions of influential people.

Read More
1386 Words | 6 Pages

The use of and the owning of guns is a very hot and debated topic in society today. For many, this is a life and death debate due to the recent and numerous school shootings. These school shootings have caused an outcry for more gun control, specifically in relation to the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. Despite these calls, increased gun control is not the answer. Most gun owners’ use their guns responsibly and for good purposes.

Read More
1543 Words | 7 Pages

The right to bear arms can be interpreted in a multitude of ways— resulting in tension between pro-gun and anti-gun supporters. With the differencing views on who should own guns, the right is questioned by many. While the Second Amendment does not state who can and cannot own guns, both U.S. Representative Gabrielle Giffords, and her husband Mark Kelly, a United States astronaut, in “Gun Control Pros and Cons: 3 Points on Both Sides of the Debate”, argue that, “background checks will prevent criminals, domestic abusers, and seriously mentally ill people from buying guns” (Newsmax). Laws

Read More
1634 Words | 7 Pages

Instead of banning or limiting guns, the evidence will show that removing the current restrictions and targeting individuals instead of guns will be a more effective process. The topic of gun control has two polarized opinions. One such opinion targets the individuals responsible for the crime, instead of just the weapons. John Moorhouse and Brent Wanner tackle the issue of gun control in their article “Does Gun Control Reduce Crime Or Does Crime Increase Gun Control”, which was published in 2006 in the twenty-sixth volume of the Cato Journal. These researchers looked at the effects gun control laws had on violent crime and gun violence in the individual states.

Read More

More about Gun Laws Pros And Cons Essay

Related Topics

Open Document