ipl-logo

Hae Min Lee Research Paper

896 Words4 Pages

Is Adnan Syed innocent or guilty? On January 13, 1999, Hae Min Lee was a senior at Woodland High School went missing. One month later, her body was found and her ex-boyfriend Adnan Syed was arrested for her murder. I believe that Adnan is innocent because he was seen at the library the day Hae Min Lee went missing and Adnan had an alibi who saw and talked to him at the library the day Hae Min Lee went missing. The first reason I believe Adnan is innocent because he was seen at the library the day Hae Min Lee went missing. This reason makes sense because it explains how Adnan is innocent. This part of the story is when Asia and her boyfriend saw Adnan at the library the day and time Hae Min Lee went missing. "Asia McClain saw him in the library at 3:00. Asia boyfriend saw him too. Library may have cameras." This quote proves Adnan is innocent because it shows who saw Adnan the day Hae Min Lee went missing and where Adnan was. The evidence that is shown is when Asia and her boyfriend saw Adnan the time Hae Min Lee went missing. "Asia plus boyfriend saw him in library …show more content…

This reason makes senses because if there was an ice storm, Adnan wouldn’t be able to go out and kill Hae. “Hae disappeared on a Wednesday. That night there was a huge ice storm, which is unusual in Maryland. It ended up being a state emergency. And school was closed for the rest of the week.” This quote proves Adnan is innocent because their was an ice storm the day Hae went missing and Adnan wouldn’t been able to kill her on that day. Adnan isn’t guilty because Asia wants to prove that he is innocent. “I just wanted you to know where I stode in this entire issue (on the centerline).” This quote proves that Adnan is innocent because Asia wants to prove the court wrong. Therefore, Adnan isn’t guilty because Asia wants to prove that Adnan didn’t kill Hae and she wants to prove the court

Show More
Related
340 Words | 2 Pages

A young boy name Adnan syed has been jailed for six-teen year because he was found guilty for murder of his ex girlfriend Hae Min Lee. A woman named Sarah kogen reopened Adnan Syed case after fifteen years of serving jail. it is obvious that Adnan Syed is not guilty because the evidence that was found was not tested. Also prosecutor jay was caught lying and keep changing his history.

Read More
687 Words | 3 Pages

What would you do if an innocent guy is behind bars? The story of Serial narrated by Sarah Koenig is about Hae Min Lee an 18 year old that was murdered in Baltimore, Maryland in 1999. Adnan Syed is accused and convicted of killing his ex, Hae Min Lee. Jay Wild is the guy who´s involved in the crime of helping Adnan hide Hae’s body although the faces no charges. Who´s Adnan?

Read More
483 Words | 2 Pages

Richard Henry Lee Richard Henry Lee was born into an eminent Virginia family on January 20, 1732, at Stratford Hall in Westmoreland, Virginia. His father, grandfather and his four brothers all served as military officers, diplomats, and legislators. Richard was tutored at home and then sent to Wakefield Academy in England for his formal education. After graduation, he traveled in Europe, and then returned to Virginia in 1752. After school in England, he was elected to the Virginia House of Burgesses and later was a delegate to the Second Continental Congress, where he proposed the colonies should be independent from Great Britain.

Read More
623 Words | 3 Pages

This story is interesting because at some points you’re like Adnan is innocent and at others you’re like ohh….this could mean he’s guilty. I believe Adnan Syed is innocent because no forensic evidence was ever tested and used in trial. Also summer (last person in contact with Hae) claims that Hae couldn’t have been there at the time the state says she was murdered. The first reason i believe Adnan is innocent is that no forensic evidence was ever tested nor used in trial.

Read More
1013 Words | 5 Pages

Anya Schultz, the author of a review titled Serial: A Captivating New Podcast, works to show how multiple narratives and stories can be manipulated and sometimes vastly misinterpreted. Serial, an intriguing, enthralling podcast hosted by Sarah Koenig, tells the story of Hae Min Lee, a young, beautiful, high school senior who was murdered in 1999. Lee 's case, as Koenig and Schultz point out, has a few missing pieces of information that were never accounted for. For example, how did the jury come to the conclusion that Lee 's ex-boyfriend, Adnan Syed, was truly guilty? Why did Syed 's lawyer forget to mention the letter from his acquaintance Asia McClain that could have polished his alibi?

Read More
684 Words | 3 Pages

This part in the story is when Jay says what he knows about the murder but because of how old Hae’s body was they couldn’t test it for DNA ‘’ no physical evidence linking Adnan to the murder ‘’ . This proves he’s innocent because there’s no evidence . Plus in one of the stories he tells from that day saying Adnan called him from BestBuy he said he used the phone from there, checked by the police and they looked back at the blue prints from there , there was no phone at bestbuy and AT &T said they couldn’t use the phone calls as an example in the jury’s office because where ever they were the call was going to pin in the Leakin Park phone call pole . Where the body was buried. There Adnan is innocent because of the lack of evidence.

Read More
903 Words | 4 Pages

Everything seems to fall into place when the prime suspect of a murder is the ex-boyfriend, but how can he be charged when evidence proves otherwise. On January 13th, 1999 Hae Min Lee was found murdered and buried in a forest, Leakin Park. Hae could have been murdered by many people, but the jury settled on the killer being Hae’s ex-boyfriend, Adnan Syed. Adnan Syed should not have been found guilty under the circumstances of, the motive, unreliable cell phone tower evidence, Asia Mcclain evidence, life after the break up, and Jay’s inconsistencies; therefore he was wrongfully convicted and is innocent. The young couple seemed perfect from the beginning, and no one could ever find a flaw; the reasoning for this murder does not show anything

Read More
1964 Words | 8 Pages

Moreover, when everyone decided that the boy is guilty, he suggested that they should talk about it first. Furthermore, he said that he didn 't

Read More
333 Words | 2 Pages

“A person is innocent until proved guilty in a court of law” In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, an 18-year-old is on trial for the murder of his father. After many pieces of evidence, the three that are in doubt are the old man hearing “I’m going to kill you!” as well as the weapon of choice and how it was replicated, and finally the woman’s testimony. In my opinion, the boy could have been proven guilty, based on these the boy is not guilty.

Read More
1008 Words | 5 Pages

This proves that Adnan was the one who killed her. Jay and Adnan both committed a serious crime. Adnan killed Hae with the help from

Read More
909 Words | 4 Pages

The principle in law that one is innocent until proven guilty has created much discourse. There are those who feel that the moment that one is arrested, there is reasonable belief that they committed the crime. However, there are those who feel that just as the principle states, one is, and should be taken as a victim and the outcome could be either way: guilty or not guilty. In fact, this argument is supported by the many cases of malicious prosecutions and mistaken identities.

Read More
754 Words | 4 Pages

When something eventful happens the human memory keeps the details and the events stored in your memory. So when your involved in something as serious as murder happens you will be able to recount your steps and remember what happened that day. So if your stories keep changing you're casting a shadow of doubt upon yourself. Jay a somewhat friend of Adnan was called down to the police station for questions connected to Hae Lee disappearance. Throughout the interviews, Jay's story kept changing and a couple of inconsistencies popped up.

Read More
1499 Words | 6 Pages

Putting these circumstances aside, it was said by many that the relationship was pretty typical and Adnan got over the breakup easily. This was said by teachers and friends of both Hae and Adnan. One of Hae’s friends, Becky, explained the relationship as “just a silly, teenage, high school, relationship” (Koenig “The Breakup”) which proves that Adnan was not as upset as the prosecution made him out to be at trial. Another notable aspect is that after Hae and Adnan broke up, Hae got in a small car accident and asked Adnan to come help her, her new boyfriend Don also showed up and confirms that him and Adnan had a cordial meeting and explains that they talked for 10 to 15 minutes even after the car situation had been figured out (Koenig “What We Know”). If Adnan was really that broken up about the breakup, he would not have been so friendly towards the new guy who seemed to take his place in Hae’s life.

Read More
1164 Words | 5 Pages

If our judicial system still believes that someone is innocent until proven guilty, then Adnan has to be innocent, because they did not prove him

Read More
769 Words | 4 Pages

The law is well settled that each and every incriminating circumstance is required to be clearly established with supporting evidences and also the chain of events should be complete in such a manner that the only conclusion which could be drawn is guilt of the accused and no other hypothesis against the guilt is possible. The Supreme court also didn’t hesitate in giving death sentence to the murderer only because the case relied on circumstantial evidence. The general rule is that it is admissible in a court of law but they are required to be cautious when a case solely relies on circumstantial evidence. All the facts should be closely examined and it must be looked at

Read More

More about Hae Min Lee Research Paper

Open Document