ipl-logo

Hale, Danforth And Hubris In The Crucible By Arthur Miller

678 Words3 Pages

In Arthur Miller’s “The Crucible”, Hale, Danforth, and Parris are three key characters in the play whom have varying personalities, actions, and opinions. At one point in the story they share similar views, yet their motives are vastly different. The three authority figures in the play resemble each other in some aspects yet differ greatly in their attitudes and responses towards the witch trials. Hale begins his journey with a logical outlook, but eventually realizes the mass hysteria occurring. His goal in coming to Salem was to diagnose the town with witchcraft and earn a better reputation. Initially, Hale is unaware of the personal vendettas and hunger for land that can be attributed to accusations in the village. He tells the villagers “We cannot look to superstition in this. The devil is precise, the marks of his presence are definite as stone, and I must tell you all that I shall not proceed unless you are prepared to believe me if I should find no bruise of hell upon her” (41) Hale is serious about discovering witchcraft. He is easily manipulated by the girls and their testimonies. But his stance changes. Following a conversation with Proctor …show more content…

Similar to Danforth, he is only concerned about his reputation. He warns Betty, “Now look you child, your punishment will come in its time, but if you trafficked with spirits in the forest I must know it now, for surely my enemies will, and they will ruin me with it!” (10) This scene may seem like a father worried for his sick child, but he is really worried what people will say about him. “I’ll lead them in psalm, but let you say nothing of witchcraft, I will not discuss it. The cause is yet unknown. I have had enough contention since I came; I want no more. (125-126) As for this quote, Parris was attempting to save anything left of his already damaged reputation. His actions throughout the play show his true

Open Document