ipl-logo

Hammurabi: A Powerful Ruler Of Babylon

394 Words2 Pages

Cutting off a son’s hands if they strike their father - that may seem harsh to us nowadays, but in Hammurabi’s time, this rules united the whole entire empire and maintained order throughout the kingdom. Hammurabi was a powerful ruler of the kingdom of Babylon. He ruled for 42 years and ruled over most of Mesopotamia. Hammurabi became the ruler in 1792 BCE and made many great advancements including: a postal system, an irrigation maintenance system, and most importantly, a code of laws. Hammurabi had a strict code of laws that every citizen of Babylon had to follow. The code of laws were written on a stele and were divided into three parts: the Prologue, Laws, and Epilogue. Hammurabi claimed that the “gods” told him to write these 282 …show more content…

Hammurabi’s Code covered many issues, including trade, marriage, and divorce. I believe that Hammurabi’s code was fair and just. There many reasons why Hammurabi’s code was fair. For example, Property Law number 21 states: “If a man has broken through the wall [to rob] a house, they shall put him to death and pierce him, or hang him in the hole in the wall which he has made.” This law is fair because if you broke through someone’s wall, they will have to spend lots of time and money to repair it. The victim would also have to replace the items the robber stole. I think that this law is a threat to deter any burglars. Also, Family Law number 168 states: “If a man has married a wife and a disease has seized her, if he is determined to marry a second wife, he

Show More
Related
545 Words | 3 Pages

Was it Just? “Cursed!” is what you'll hear if you decline the written rules of Hammurabi.400 years ago in 1754 Bce. A man named Hammurabi became king of a city called babylonia and made certain rules about family law, property law, and personal injury law and although they were laws, not all laws were fair. To begin with, Hammurabi made a decision to write rules for his land. But were they just?let's answer that.

Read More
583 Words | 3 Pages

The first reason that Hammurabi’s Code of law is unjust is the Personal Injury Law. In document E, law number 218 stated that if a surgeon operated with a bronze lancet on a free man for a serious injury and the man dies, his hands will be cut off. Also in law numbers 209 and 213 they stated that a if a man has struck a free women and the fruit of her womb is lost he pays 10 shekels of silver but if the man hit’s a slave women and she loses her froot of the womb the man only has to pay 2 shekels of silver. It might seem if the personal injury laws are absolutely just but they are really not because in law 218 the surgeon hands are cut of if he fails to save the man and in laws 213 and 209 the free women gets more shekels of silver then the slave women and also if the man hits the women and the fruit of her womb in not lost the man

Read More
531 Words | 3 Pages

I believe that Hammurabi’s code was just. I have all of the laws and documents that support my claim as to why I think the code was just. I think that Hammurabi’s code was just because obviously these things had to have happened at least once or they wouldn’t have laws about it. So society needs to learn even if it means having that harsh of a punishment. Having that harsh of a punishment actually helps because society sees that if they do that specific crime, they will get a really bad punishment so that prevents it from happening.

Read More
420 Words | 2 Pages

How would you feel if you had your hands chopped off? This can happen in Hammurabi’s code. If a son struck his father, his hand would be chopped off. Hammurabi ruled Babylon for 42 years. In the 38th year of his rule, Hammurabi had 282 laws carved on a large pillar like stone called stele.

Read More
480 Words | 2 Pages

Hammurabi’s code was a set of laws designed to assign punishments to perpetrators who committed crimes. These laws were also put in place to determine repayment from trading and marital infractions. Hammurabi’s Code affected Mesopotamia’s society in many ways. Laws affecting trading, social ranking, marriage, property, etc. These laws tell us that it is important for agents and merchants to do their part when trading.

Read More
179 Words | 1 Pages

Hammurabi was one of the kings of Egypt during the First Babylonian Dynasty in Mesopotamia. Hammurabi believed in the philosophy of retaliation, or an eye for an eye. Using that idea, Hammurabi set up a legal system with a set of laws called

Read More
565 Words | 3 Pages

Hammurabi's saying “An eye for an eye” (History.com, 2009) was very true and he was going to stick to that style of ruling. Hammurabi explained that strict and harsh laws were in place to prevent people from doing bad things and essentially to strike fear into bad people. Hammurabi felt that there would be much less crime if his laws and consequences were very harsh and that made him feel like he could help and keep his community in a good spot. This was seen as the fairest way to dispense justice back then.

Read More
1138 Words | 5 Pages

The Judgments of Hammurabi are a set of laws that were written by a god. The laws were put in place “to promote the welfare of the people, to cause justice to prevail in the land, and so the strong might not oppress the weak.” The Tale of The Eloquent Peasant, depicts how a peasant has been robbed of his goods and how he eloquently appeals to the king for justice to be served. Both articles discuss; the division of a society’s social class, how gods/kings interpret justice and family relationships within the law. The Judgments of Hammurabi laid out the rules for Mesopotamian citizens.

Read More
103 Words | 1 Pages

These examples show that Hammurabi's code was unjust because this law was a very extreme law for just cheating on her husband. Instead what I think what should happen is that the man should just disinherit her instead of drowning her and the man she was cheating with.because what is happening you're just losing people and I don’t think want to join this empire if these laws are so extreme. And if your son hits you and get his chopped that is really extreme punishment but what if the son is just a little boy playing with his father or upset at him.

Read More
834 Words | 4 Pages

His laws were discriminatory in that they were often seen as cruel punishments for the lower-class society. One of the reasons why he was so hash was his lack of desire to deal with such little problems as Rule 195, "If a son strikes his father, his hands shall be cut off." Many believed there were better ways to solve these problems than physical punishments. This may be seen as the simple way out of court trials and therefore made King Hummurabi 's life a little easier. It was perceived that the rich or upper-class were favored by the king.

Read More
775 Words | 4 Pages

Most of Hammurabi’s laws are not just to the people or society of Babylon. Now, picture in your mind, living in Babylon with Hammurabi as your ruler. Wasn’t as good as you

Read More
701 Words | 3 Pages

Visualize having a king who made 282 laws and if a person did not follow them they would get a really big punishment. That is how it was 4,000 years ago when a king named Hammurabi ruled in Babylon. He ruled Babylon for 42 years. King Hammurabi became king of Babylon in 1754 BCE. Were Hammurabi’s laws and codes fair and just?

Read More
875 Words | 4 Pages

Was Hammurabi’s code just? Nearly 4,000 years ago, a man named Hammurabi became king of a city state called babylon. Hammurabi made a very important code in 18th century B.C.E. Hammurabi made 282 laws and he made these codes to protect the weak and poor from the strong. There are areas of law where Hammurabi’s code can be shown to be both, just and unjust. These are Family Law, Property Law, and Personal Injury Law.

Read More
558 Words | 3 Pages

Hammurabi came to power around 1766 BC and was dominant over Mesopotamia for forty-two years. Along with strategies on gaining political and militaristic power using water, he also created a justice system using a series of 282 laws which highlighted the main concerns at the time, including the idea of an eye-for-an-eye, which is continually used today in some societies. Some can argue that Hammurabi’s code wasn’t predominant to modern history, but I disagree. It unified his empire and brought somewhat fair rules from the result of resource scarcity. Hammurabi 's code is possibly one of the most monumental achievements in Sumerian civilizations.

Read More
874 Words | 4 Pages

He is known today for his law code that supported “an eye for a eye” and the civil rights he gave to members of the society other than men. Hammurabi set a strong foundation for our society today, with his rules and family relationship changes, he did it by making a set in stone law code, and giving the women of ancient Babylonia more civil rights in marriage. Hammurabi’s law code was the first of its kind that we base our legal system off of today. Hammurabi’s Code

Read More

More about Hammurabi: A Powerful Ruler Of Babylon

Related Topics

Open Document