ipl-logo

Hammurabi Was It Just Dbq Research Paper

545 Words3 Pages

Was it Just? “Cursed!” is what you'll hear if you decline the written rules of Hammurabi.400 years ago in 1754 Bce. A man named Hammurabi became king of a city called babylonia and made certain rules about family law, property law, and personal injury law and although they were laws, not all laws were fair.

To begin with, Hammurabi made a decision to write rules for his land.But were they just?let's answer that. According to Hammurabi's code document c law 129,”If a married lady is caught [in adultery] with another man they shall blind them and cast them into the water.” this proves This was unjust because what if the man didn't know she was married and still has to get drowned while being innocent. It's exaggerated to be punished by death for cheating because they shouldn't be punished for the way they are.

Another one of hammurabi's rules was document D law 23, “who has been robbed shall formally declare whatever he has lost before the god, and the city or district the robbery has been committed shall replace for him whatever he has lost if the robber is not caught”.
Instead of the community searching for the robber to keep their community safe they let the robber free and is preferring to take money from its people. Since everybody in the community is being forced to help, those …show more content…

For example law 148 in Hammurabi's code it says,”if a man has married a wife with a disease has seized her,he is determined to marry a second wife he shall not divorce the wife whom the disease has seised .she shall dwell in the house they have built together and he shall maintain her as long as she lives.”this proves that not all of hammurabi's laws were unfair,maintaining a wife for as LONG as she lives with a horrible disease will keep the ill wife happy as long as she lives. Furthermore,this law is fair because it shows that marriage is a life time

Show More
Related
831 Words | 4 Pages

He also claimed that multiple gods including Shamash gave him the right to rule. The laws were displayed all over the place on humongous stone steeles which is a pillar-like structure. The question now is, was Hammurababi’s code just or unjust? Hammurabi’s code was unjust because not everyone was treated equally, it couldn’t be changed, and it was written from one perspective. To start, Hammurabi’s code was unjust because it treated people of different social classes differently.

Read More
657 Words | 3 Pages

Hammurabi’s Code DBQ King Hammurabi’s rule began in the city of Babylon. He later then extended his control by taking over Larsa and Mari a large part of Mesopotamia. After expanding his land, Shamash, the god of justice presented him with a code of 232 laws (Doc A). These laws were then influenced throughout the community and were considered a part of the communities culture. I disagree with Hammurabi’s code because most laws were to cruel and targeted certain people.

Read More
841 Words | 4 Pages

I feel as though they are fair because of the rules 23, 129, 196 and several documents that were found. In the family section Hammurabi’s code is just. It is fair because of laws 129, 148, 168, and Document C. Law 129 is: If a married woman is caught [in adultery] with another man, they shall bind them together. This law

Read More
1452 Words | 6 Pages

The law 23 is"If the robber is not caught,the man who has been robbed shall formally declare whatever he has lost before a God,and the city and the territorial mayor or mayor of the district has been committed shall replace for him whatever he has lost." This meaning the mayor must pay for some other person mistakes. The robber is left and could escape while the mayor and city

Read More
531 Words | 3 Pages

In law 48 it states that if a man loans money to someone for crops and a storm comes and ruins them, the person that borrowed the money doesn’t have to pay it back for another year. This is fair because the loaner is taking the chance, knowing that something may happen, and that’s his decision. In Law 53 and 54 it states that if a man opens his trench to water his crops and floods the neighbors crops on accident, he must replace all the crops he has destroyed. This is fair because he destroyed the crops and the other farmer may have been depending on those crops to feed his family. Hammurabi’s Property Laws were fair much like his Personal-Injury

Read More
589 Words | 3 Pages

The definition of the word “just” is fair, therefore I will be explaining if I think the laws are fair or unfair. In my opinion, Hammurabi’s laws were unfair to the citizens of the civilization. The laws were very cruel, unnecessary, and very extra. In the following paragraphs, I will explain my reasoning for my thoughts on Hammurabi’s laws. Based on the information that I have read on

Read More
420 Words | 2 Pages

Some laws varied according to whether you were either higher class or lower class, and whether you were a man or a woman. Hammurabi’s Code was not just because the punishments were cruel and some were gruesome. Children were not treated as well as adults, even though his laws were supposed to protect woman and young children. Hammurabi’s code was based off the saying “an eye for an eye.” Some people probably could not even read what the writing

Read More
453 Words | 2 Pages

For instance, in Law 199, if someone’s eye had been knocked out and they were a slave, the person would have to pay half the value of the slave to the owner, if the person was free, the other person’s eye needed to be knocked out, too. In addition, in Law 213, if a man hits a girl, that is a slave, which is pregnant, and she loses the baby, the man will pay two shekels of silver, but if it’s a girl that is free, her father will get paid ten shekels of silver. The reason I think that these two laws aren’t fair is because people on the lower scale didn’t have the same consequences as people on the higher scale. Overall, Hammurabi didn’t protect everyone, mostly being people on the lower social

Read More
1138 Words | 5 Pages

The Judgments of Hammurabi are a set of laws that were written by a god. The laws were put in place “to promote the welfare of the people, to cause justice to prevail in the land, and so the strong might not oppress the weak.” The Tale of The Eloquent Peasant, depicts how a peasant has been robbed of his goods and how he eloquently appeals to the king for justice to be served. Both articles discuss; the division of a society’s social class, how gods/kings interpret justice and family relationships within the law. The Judgments of Hammurabi laid out the rules for Mesopotamian citizens.

Read More
702 Words | 3 Pages

Hammurabi’s code was unfair to women. As it states in law 148 document C, if a wife of a man has a disease and her husband is determined to marry a second wife, he will marry her. However, he will not divorce his first wife. She will live in the house they had built together and he will maintain her as long as she lives. This law is unfair to the first wife because if her husband really loved her he would not marry a second wife.

Read More
775 Words | 4 Pages

Hammurabi’s code was not just because the personal injury laws did not protect all people equally, property laws were harsh and not protecting people enough, and the Family laws should allow people to be with whoever they want to be with. Looking at the evidence from the Personal Injury Laws states that punishments towards slaves are

Read More
701 Words | 3 Pages

She shall dwell in the house they have built together, and he shall maintain her as long as she lives.” This is unjust because you should not leave your sick wife alone and marry another woman. Many people think king Hammurabi’s laws were just, but they were not just because of that evidence. Justice is not absolute in this because people worked hard to make a marriage,

Read More
875 Words | 4 Pages

Was Hammurabi’s code just? Nearly 4,000 years ago, a man named Hammurabi became king of a city state called babylon. Hammurabi made a very important code in 18th century B.C.E. Hammurabi made 282 laws and he made these codes to protect the weak and poor from the strong. There are areas of law where Hammurabi’s code can be shown to be both, just and unjust. These are Family Law, Property Law, and Personal Injury Law.

Read More
675 Words | 3 Pages

These laws should both have the same consequences because all women should be treated equal. These laws on injury show that Hammurabi's code is very unjust. Hammurabi’s code may have been written to protect everyone, but the laws ended up being excessive and harmful. The laws about family, property, and injury are cruelly excessive and are unequal towards different classes.

Read More
874 Words | 4 Pages

With all of Hammurabi’s advancements did he really impact the world today? The Babylonian king Hammurabi, who expanded the city-state of Babylon across the Euphrates River, proclaimed one of the earliest and most complete ancient legal codes B.C. Hammurabi was the sixth king of the First Babylonian Dynasty, reigning from 1792 BC to 1750 BC. His father, Sin-Muballit, who abdicated due to failing health, preceded Hammurabi.

Read More

More about Hammurabi Was It Just Dbq Research Paper

Related Topics

Open Document