ipl-logo

The Han Dynasty

1032 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Compare roman empire and han dynasty

The roman and Han empire, although two completely different civilizations, yet despite that both fell due to similar key contributors. The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty fell due to alike reasons. For both empires weak leadership and corruption, economic collapse and social disorder were three of the main contributor’s factors to their decline.
Both the Roman Empire and Han Dynasty endured corruption that weakened their supremacy. Weak-leadership and corruption weakened both empires causing it to be a key factor to their falls. For instance during the Han Dynasty Pingdi was the chosen successor to emperor Aidi, who died 1BCE, was only 9 years-old and acted as a mere puppet for court official Wang Mang, whom also chose the following successors …show more content…

The social disorder led to wars and rebellions which occurred in both the Roman empire and Han dynasty acting as a catalase to both of their falls. Riots caused by follower of Way of Great Peace, 184 AD a religious cult, although supresed within a year it created a ripple inspiring uprising from multiple other cults creating a situation the government was unable to contain leading to fatal the civil war that was the end of the Han Dynasty (Ebrey 84). Following the rebellion from the Way of Great Peace, the Han government officials were attacked over several parts of the country, Magistrates and prefects killed at any opportunity, in riots that took a year to control which was followed by more riots that the government was unable to control causing a civil war in which all generals with private armies were fighting for personal power until 189 A.D. when the civil war ended along with the Han dynasty as an general gained control and titled himself Emperor (Ebrey 84). In contrast the Roman Empire relied heavily on slaves for labors chores such as craftsman and milling fields as well as much more, thus when Romans steady supply of slaves from war was cut when the empires expansion ebbed to an end it negatively affected the lives of the romans causing disorder in the society (Andrews). The social disorder was magnified as it affected the divide between the rich and poor, enhancing it, dividing the …show more content…

This is vital because we could learn from empires in history to avoid similar downfalls in future civilizations and look to detect the possible downfalls in our societies by comparing our own civilizations to the empires of the past such as the Roman and the Han Dynasty. Could the fall of future empires also fall due to these issues, could they carry over to America causing its

Show More
Related
1139 Words | 5 Pages

The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire. The Han dynasty Empire and the Roman empire stood large and mighty at the start of the Common Era, with the two kingdoms controlling an unprecedented mass amount of populations under their reign. Both kingdoms rose as predecessors from previous political systems that extended lands under one rule, with the Roman Republic expansion in Europe after the Punic wars and the Qin state achieving conquest over six other nearby states creating the first imperial China in east Asia. The heavy hand of the Qin dynasty and the assassination of Rome’s beloved general, Julius Caesar, by the Roman senate, threw both kingdoms into rebellion, ushering in centuries of imperialistic rule for both in their respective timelines.

Read More
569 Words | 3 Pages

Andrea Gavin Mrs. Fox History Oct 06, 2017 Fall of Classical Empires The Han dynasty and the Western Roman empire have many reasons of why they fell. Powerful and strong these empires were, but just like any other empire they had their similarities and differences, that caused their fall. One of their similarities was invasions by barbarian tribes.

Read More
492 Words | 2 Pages

During this period of time the Ming and the Han were able to improve their way of having a government. The Ming were able to solve this problem by not having the government add harsh and strict rules, this also improved by showing compassion towards their citizens, they also split their government into functional sections in order to help them prosper. And due to having other new governments they were able to use some of their ideas like making the ships and boats move a lot faster than usual. But for the Han government was able to prosper by establishing a new political system, they also followed the ideas of Confucianism by believing that their ruler was a father over them and they should not be lead by force. The government officials were told to be honest.

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

During the era of classical societies, the Han and Roman empires were two vast cosmopolitan societies which dominated regions all throughout Eurasia. In regards to the fall of the Han and Roman empires, both were similar in that they fell victim to internal government decay, but different in that Rome fell to foreign invasions, while Han suffered from rebellions of their own people. The Han and Roman empires were similar in their fall in that they both suffered from internal decay, specifically of their governments. In the Han empire, land distribution problems that were originally sought to be fixed by the “Socialist emperor” Wang Mang allowed large landowners to become even more influential than they previously were.

Read More
195 Words | 1 Pages

Comparing the Han Dynasty and Roman Empire The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire in the Classical Period were similar in their downfall and advances, but differed politically. The Roman Empire gradually fell for many different reasons. In the same way, the downfall of the Han Dynasty was caused by a multitude of factors, many of these being the same as the Roman’s. Just as the Roman Empire was hurt by the number of nomadic invasions, so was the Han.

Read More
477 Words | 2 Pages

The fall of the Roman Empire, where every leader gets murdered along with the military. Rome was the most powerful empire in the ancient world until it fell. The three primary reasons for the fall of the Roman Empire are weakened military and invasions, too much territory to govern, and faulty leadership. One of the primary reasons why Rome fell was that it suffered from a weakened military and invasions.

Read More
543 Words | 3 Pages

Rome was a very powerful empire, but eventually fell because of one thing, weak political leadership. Weak political leadership was the main reason why Rome fell and it was more of a chain because when there is bad leadership then there is bad military and more invaders. The invasions got more effective and hurt the empire a lot more than it should have at that time. First of all Rome went from a republic to a empire with all the power and rights from the people slowly slipping away to the all powerful emperors at the end. Emperors did not want to share any power with the people which was very bad because they only paid attention to power, for example how Julius Caesar get kill/assassinated on March 15, 44 BCE in Rome, Italy.

Read More
793 Words | 4 Pages

The emperors weren’t liked. The abused power of the Praetorian Guard, leaded to the unfair selection of many disreputable emperors and the assassination of those not favoured by the Guard. The ones that were assassinated had short reigns, usually only lasting 3-6 years. For a fact, many of the emperors took their power by killing the previous emperor. They were so focused on power that they didn’t notice how bad their empire, land, and care of people had become.

Read More
509 Words | 3 Pages

Perhaps the two most important civilizations, Rome and Han China both fell due to major similarities. At the same time, Rome and Han China fell due to distinct differences as well. Furthermore, the collapse of China and Rome had far more similarities rather than differences. During 200 and 600 BCE both classical civilizations suffered from outside invasions; growing from Central Asia. They were not as sweeping as earlier Indo-European growth but tested Rome and China severely.

Read More
570 Words | 3 Pages

Confusion of leadership caused the government to be highly unstabalized and as the empire grew; lower classes were being burdened by increasing taxes. Ineffective leadership did not allow these problems to be addressed and over extension of borders caused the empire to be too much for one person to rule so the empire was split into two eastern and western

Read More
468 Words | 2 Pages

The fall of Rome was mainly because of plagues wiping out most of the population. The fall of the Han dynasty began from decentralized rule. However, outside invasions had an effect on the fall of both classical civilizations. Series of plagues began to hit the Rome Empire by the 2nd century. These plagues lowered the population drastically.

Read More
506 Words | 3 Pages

The Fall of the Western Roman Empire The Western Roman Empire was an inspiring empire that mastered architecture, engineering, trading, and many other things. But as the empire grew political problems went with it and followed economic issues, diseases and eventually foreign invaders. One of the main reasons for the fall of the Western Roman Empire was the many political problems.

Read More
979 Words | 4 Pages

How did an empire so big and powerful fall apart after all of the work and planning that was put into it? The once powerful Roman Empire fell apart for various reasons, such as the over expansion of land and military overspending which led to inadequate man power to cover all of the frontiers and insufficient funds. Also, the corrupt government system of the empire and the instability of its politics for an empire so large, the government was not fit to control

Read More
481 Words | 2 Pages

The Western Roman Empire fell in 476 AD. There were many factors that went into the fall of the Roman Empire. Economic problems they dealt with was one of the main reasons the Empire fell. Since the romans were not doing good Economically they could not fund the military in order to protect them, which also led to the fall of their military. Socio-Political problems were also a factor; there was a decline in interest to public affairs.

Read More
517 Words | 3 Pages

Fall of Rome DBQ Including most of the Mediterranean world, Rome, a city that was growing big enough to become one of the world’s largest empire’s would soon slowly fall apart because of their problems. In 27 BC, Rome’s first emperor, Augustus Caesar, took complete power. During his time, he ruled with Pax Romana, a time of Roman peace which lasted for almost 200 years. After his death, the Roman Empire begun to break apart. The primary reasons for the fall of Rome was it being geographically too big; the population was decreasing due to plagues which led to the Roman army becoming weak, social and military issues and laziness of the military would guide the army down which led to cities being lost, and their government and leadership issues of the weak or selfish power leaders would all conduct to the breaking up of Rome.

Read More

More about The Han Dynasty

Related Topics

Open Document